Models of natural systems

Despite the obvious versatility of light-activated key steps and their numerous advantages for the biomimetic modeling of natural systems, up to now, only very few examples are known, where such types of photosensitized processes have been successfully combined to complete reaction cycles with reasonable catalytic turnovers 6). In the last section, we are therefore briefly presenting two case studies which describe some recent work performed in our own group focusing on bioinspired catalytic systems that can be controlled and driven by visible light. 

Steefel C. I. and Van Cappellen P. (1998) Reactive transport modelling of natural systems. J. Hydrol. 209, 1-7. 

Brown J. G., Bassett R. L., and Glynn P. D. (1998) Analysis and simulation of reactive transport of metal contaminants in ground water in Pinal Creek Basin, Arizona. In Special Issue—Reactive Transport Modeling of Natural Systems (eds. C. I. Steefel and P. van Cappellen). J. Hydrol. 209, 225 - 250. 

Reaction kinetics represented by the general form of Equation 1 have been employed in a number of quantitative chemical models of natural systems. Under ideal conditions, the four parameters, total mass transfer, kinetic rate constants, time, and the reactive surface area can be determined independently, permitting the unique definition of the model. In most cases, at least one of the variables, most often surface area, is treated as a dependent term. This nonuniqueness arises when the reactive surface area of a natural system cannot be estimated, or because such estimates made either from geometric or BET measurements do not produce reasonable fits to the other parameters. Most often the calculated total mass transfer significantly exceeds the observed transfer based on measured aqueous concentrations. 

Steefel, C. I. van Cappellen, P. (1998) Reactive Transport Modelling of Natural Systems. Special Issue Journal of Hydrology 209. 

STUDY ON SOME DIOXYGEN CARRIERS - NEW MODELS OF NATURAL SYSTEMS... 

Theoretically based correlations (or semitheoretical extensions of them), rooted in thermodynamics or other fundamentals are ordinarily preferred. However, rigorous theoretical understanding of real systems is far from complete, and purely empirical correlations typically have strict limits on apphcabihty. Many correlations result from curve-fitting the desired parameter to an appropriate independent variable. Some fitting exercises are rooted in theory, eg, Antoine s equation for vapor pressure others can be described as being semitheoretical. These distinctions usually do not refer to adherence to the observations of natural systems, but rather to the agreement in form to mathematical models of idealized systems. The advent of readily available computers has revolutionized the development and use of correlation techniques (see Chemometrics Computer technology Dimensional analysis). 

The introductory chapter of this book identified four basic motivations for studying CA. The subsequent chapters have discussed a wide variety of CA models predicated on the first three of these four motivations namely, using CA as... (1) as powerful computational engines, (2) as discrete dynamical system simulators, and (3) as conceptual vehicles for studying general pattern formation and complexity. However, we have not yet presented any concrete examples of CA models predicated on the fourth-and arguably the deepest-motivation for studying CA as fundamental models of nature. A discussion of this fourth class of CA models is taken up in earnest in this chapter, whose narrative is woven around a search for an answer to the beisic speculative question, Is nature, at its core, a CA "... 

Chemistry, like other sciences, progresses through the use of models. Models are the means by which we attempt to understand nature. In this book, we are primarily concerned with models of complex systems, those systems whose behaviors result from the many interactions of a large number of ingredients. In this context, two powerful approaches have been developed in recent years for chemical investigations molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo calculations [4-7]. Both techniques have been made possible by the development of extremely powerful, modern, high-speed computers. 

Although the Lewis cell was introduced over 50 years ago, and has several drawbacks, it is still used widely to study liquid-liquid interfacial kinetics, due to its simplicity and the adaptable nature of the experimental setup. For example, it was used recently to study the hydrolysis kinetics of -butyl acetate in the presence of a phase transfer catalyst [21]. Modeling of the system involved solving mass balance equations for coupled mass transfer and reactions for all of the species involved. Further recent applications of modified Lewis cells have focused on stripping-extraction kinetics [22-24], uncatalyzed hydrolysis [25,26], and partitioning kinetics [27]. 

Tables I and II present the results of the Work Group discussions for the screening and site-specific level models, respectively. The assessment in these tables is based on a ranking scale between 0 and 100 0 indicates situations where no testing has been attempted and 100 identifies areas where extensive testing has been completed with sufficient post-audits to validate the predictive capability of relevant models. The scores can also be interpreted to mean the extent to which additional field testing would improve our understanding of how well the models represent natural systems. It is important to note that the scores do not indicate model accuracy per se they show the degree to which current field testing has been able to identify or estimate model accuracy.

Models of natural waters calculated assuming redox disequilibrium generally require more input data than equilibrium models, in which a single variable constrains the system s oxidation state. The modeler can decouple as many redox pairs as can be independently constrained. A completely decoupled model, therefore, would require analytical data for each element in each of its redox states. Unfortunately, analytical data of this completeness are seldom collected. 

The great value of kinetic theory is that it frees us from many of the constraints of the equilibrium model and its variants (partial equilibrium, local equilibrium, and so on see Chapter 2). In early studies (e.g., Lasaga, 1984), geochemists were openly optimistic that the results of laboratory experiments could be applied directly to the study of natural systems. Transferring the laboratory results to field situations, however, has proved to be much more challenging than many first imagined. 

The theory describing the light-harvesting effects suggests going beyond the dipole-dipole approximation of Forster theory [67, 68], Its development for modeling the natural systems of photosynthesis is beneficial for the design of fluorescence reporters. 

---