Modelling Molecules Molecular Orbitals

A species such as this is referred to as an excited singlet state. 2. The two electrons have parallel spins  

Some aspects of the bonding in molecules are explained by a model called molecular orbital theory. In an analogous manner to that used for atomic orbitals, the quantum mechanical model applied to molecules allows only certain energy states of an electron to exist. These quantised energy states are described by using specific wavefunctions called molecular orbitals. 

The lower-energy bonding molecular orbitals result when atomic orbital wavefunctions enhance each other in the region of the nuclei. The atoms are held together by attraction between the nuclei and the electrons in the bonding molecular orbital, and /Ab = Va + W 

The phasing of the molecular orbitals (shown as +/-) is a result of the wavefunctions describing the orbitals. + shows that the wavefunction is positive in a particular region in space, and - shows that the wavefunction is negative. 

---

In Chapter 9, we considered a simple picture of metallic bonding, the electron-sea model The molecular orbital approach leads to a refinement of this model known as band theory. Here, a crystal of a metal is considered to be one huge molecule. Valence electrons of the metal are fed into delocalized molecular orbitals, formed in the usual way from atomic... 

Chemical bonding can be described in terms of a molecular orbital model. The molecular orbital approach is based on the idea that, as electrons in atoms occupy atomic orbitals, electrons in molecules occupy molecular orbitals. Molecular orbitals have many of the same properties as atomic orbitals. They are populated by electrons, beginning with the orbital with the lowest energy and a molecular orbital is full when it contains two electrons of opposite spin. 

There are two main ways of representing the H2O molecule the point-charge model and molecular orbital representation. 

Abstract We use Nuclear Magnetic Resonance relaxometry (i.e. the frequency variation of the NMR relaxation rates) of quadrupolar nucleus ( Na) and H Pulsed Gradient Spin Echo NMR to determine the mobility of the counterions and the water molecules within aqueous dispersions of clays. The local ordering of isotropic dilute clay dispersions is investigated by NMR relaxometry. In contrast, the NMR spectra of the quadrupolar nucleus and the anisotropy of the water self-diffusion tensor clearly exhibit the occurrence of nematic ordering in dense aqueous dispersions. Multi-scale numerical models exploiting molecular orbital quantum calculations, Grand Canonical Monte Carlo simulations, Molecular and Brownian Dynamics are used to interpret the measured water mobility and the ionic quadrupolar relaxation measurements. 

The solution of the H atom problem of Chapter 1 provides us with the concept of atomic orbitals. Its extension provides a model for the electronic structure of the heavier atoms which can be developed into an MO model for molecules. Molecular orbitals formed from linear combinations of the same AOs provide a serviceable conceptual model for the electronic structures of molecules. The same AOs provide an approach to the electronic structure of extended systems with periodic geometric structures. It is useful because it avoids the nightmare of 1023 MOs dreamed above. 

I had a question the other day, You know what I d like to do, I d like to see a Hansch analysis on a series of compounds and then I d like to see some molecular orbital calculations on the same series. The point is that you don t compare this type of correlation with that type of correlation in this sense. Rather I think it is more important to look at a particular model and then use whatever techniques you need to get the parameters that go into that model, whether you measure the dipole moment or whether you calculate it from wavefunctions or whether you take the charge densities from pK measurements or whether you calculate the charge density. It is not the Hansch model vs. molecular orbitals. That makes no sense to me. Rather it is using molecular orbital calculations to get at fundamental properties of the molecules—the same way that you would get at them if you measured the infrared absorption of... 

Now suppose that we had not two but three or four of these atoms in a row (Fig. 1-6). This is the situation we might imagine, for example, with butadiene. If we consider the p -orbital on, say, the second of these atoms, labelled 2 in Fig. 1-6, then this could overlap, for example, with the orbital on carbon-atom 1—or, it may equally well overlap with the p,-orbital on carbon-atom 3 similarly, 3 can overlap equally well with 4 as with 2. It is therefore no longer rational to suppose that we have here a localised bonding in the way in which it was reasonable to postulate with the tr-electrons in fact, in this model, the molecular orbital formed from the overlap of the p -atomic-orbitals would be expected to extend over all four carbon atoms of the molecule it may not extend equally over all of them, but that is something which, for the moment, we have to discount. The main feature to be... 

Some aspects of bonding are better explained by a more sophisticated model called molecular orbital theory. In Chapter 6 we saw that electrons in atoms can be described by wave functions, which we call atomic orbitals. In a similar way, molecular orbital theory describes the electrons in molecules by using specific wave functions called molecular orbitals (MO). 

Last, you have learned to predict the three-dimensional structure of molecules using the valence shell electron pair repulsion (VSEPR) model and molecular orbital (MO) theory. An ability to predict three-dimensional structure is critical to understanding the properties and reactivity of molecules. 

Hartree-Fock computations result in the molecular orbital model the molecular orbitals and the orbital energies scheme ( minimal model ), and thus they provide the conceptual framework for the molecule. It is the sort of model, which may be discussed, thought of, and used to search for explanation of physical and chemical phenomena. So far such a possibihty does not exist for advanced methods, where often we obtain very good results, but it is extremely difficult to get an idea why they agree so well with experiments. ... 

Figure 3.6 shows the LCAO method for generating molecular orbitals of diatomic molecules such as H2. In real molecules, the atomic orbitals of elemental carbon are not really transformed into the molecular orbitals found in methane (CH4). Figure 3.6 represents a mathematical model that mixes atomic orbitals to predict molecular orbitals. Molecular orbitals exist in real molecules and the LCAO model attempts to use known atomic orbitals for atoms to predict the orbitals in the molecule. Molecular orbitals and atomic orbitals are very different in shape and energy, so it is not surprising that the model used for diatomic hydrogen fails for molecules containing other than s-orbitals. 

In bond orbital theory the wave functions of the molecule are derived from the wave functions associated with the different bonds of a molecule, i.e. from the bond orbitals. In the LCBO model the molecular orbitals are a linear combination of bond orbitals which in turn are a combination of the atomic orbitals or hybrids forming the bond in question [2b]. In the HLSP-method the many-electron wave functions are a sum of product functions which contain a Heitler and London type of factor (space function and spin function) for each bond of the molecule. 

Boranes are typical species with electron-deficient bonds, where a chemical bond has more centers than electrons. The smallest molecule showing this property is diborane. Each of the two B-H-B bonds (shown in Figure 2-60a) contains only two electrons, while the molecular orbital extends over three atoms. A correct representation has to represent the delocalization of the two electrons over three atom centers as shown in Figure 2-60b. Figure 2-60c shows another type of electron-deficient bond. In boron cage compounds, boron-boron bonds share their electron pair with the unoccupied atom orbital of a third boron atom [86]. These types of bonds cannot be accommodated in a single VB model of two-electron/ two-centered bonds. 

Each of these tools has advantages and limitations. Ab initio methods involve intensive computation and therefore tend to be limited, for practical reasons of computer time, to smaller atoms, molecules, radicals, and ions. Their CPU time needs usually vary with basis set size (M) as at least M correlated methods require time proportional to at least M because they involve transformation of the atomic-orbital-based two-electron integrals to the molecular orbital basis. As computers continue to advance in power and memory size, and as theoretical methods and algorithms continue to improve, ab initio techniques will be applied to larger and more complex species. When dealing with systems in which qualitatively new electronic environments and/or new bonding types arise, or excited electronic states that are unusual, ab initio methods are essential. Semi-empirical or empirical methods would be of little use on systems whose electronic properties have not been included in the data base used to construct the parameters of such models. 

Molecular orbitals are not unique. The same exact wave function could be expressed an infinite number of ways with different, but equivalent orbitals. Two commonly used sets of orbitals are localized orbitals and symmetry-adapted orbitals (also called canonical orbitals). Localized orbitals are sometimes used because they look very much like a chemist s qualitative models of molecular bonds, lone-pair electrons, core electrons, and the like. Symmetry-adapted orbitals are more commonly used because they allow the calculation to be executed much more quickly for high-symmetry molecules. Localized orbitals can give the fastest calculations for very large molecules without symmetry due to many long-distance interactions becoming negligible. 

Valence bond and molecular orbital theory both incorporate the wave description of an atom s electrons into this picture of H2 but m somewhat different ways Both assume that electron waves behave like more familiar waves such as sound and light waves One important property of waves is called interference m physics Constructive interference occurs when two waves combine so as to reinforce each other (m phase) destructive interference occurs when they oppose each other (out of phase) (Figure 2 2) Recall from Section 1 1 that electron waves m atoms are characterized by their wave function which is the same as an orbital For an electron m the most stable state of a hydrogen atom for example this state is defined by the Is wave function and is often called the Is orbital The valence bond model bases the connection between two atoms on the overlap between half filled orbifals of fhe fwo afoms The molecular orbital model assembles a sef of molecular orbifals by combining fhe afomic orbifals of all of fhe atoms m fhe molecule... 

---