Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Model systems energy levels

This solution can be obtained explicitly either by matrix diagonalization or by other techniques (see chapter A3.4 and [42, 43]). In many cases the discrete quantum level labels in equation (A3.13.24) can be replaced by a continuous energy variable and the populations by a population density p(E), with replacement of the sum by appropriate integrals [Hj. This approach can be made the starting point of usefiil analytical solutions for certain simple model systems [H, 19, 44, 45 and 46]. [Pg.1051]

The electron-spm echo envelope modulation (ESEEM) phenomenon [37, 38] is of primary interest in pulsed EPR of solids, where anisotropic hyperfme and nuclear quadnipole interactions persist. The effect can be observed as modulations of the echo intensity in two-pulse and three-pulse experiments in which x or J is varied. In liquids the modulations are averaged to zero by rapid molecular tumbling. The physical origin of ESEEM can be understood in tenns of the four-level spin energy diagram for the S = I = model system... [Pg.1578]

The present paper is organized as follows In a first step, the derivation of QCMD and related models is reviewed in the framework of the semiclassical approach, 2. This approach, however, does not reveal the close connection between the QCMD and BO models. For establishing this connection, the BO model is shown to be the adiabatic limit of both, QD and QCMD, 3. Since the BO model is well-known to fail at energy level crossings, we have to discuss the influence of such crossings on QCMD-like models, too. This is done by the means of a relatively simple test system for a specific type of such a crossing where non-adiabatic excitations take place, 4. Here, all models so far discussed fail. Finally, we suggest a modification of the QCMD system to overcome this failure. [Pg.381]

For reactions between atoms, the computation needs to model only the translational energy of impact. For molecular reactions, there are internal energies to be included in the calculation. These internal energies are vibrational and rotational motions, which have quantized energy levels. Even with these corrections included, rate constant calculations tend to lose accuracy as the complexity of the molecular system and reaction mechanism increases. [Pg.167]

This technique can be used to model a complete system as a small model system and the complete system. The complete system would be computed using only the lower level of theory. The model system would be computed with both levels of theory. The energy for the complete system, combining both levels of theory, would then be... [Pg.201]

FIGURE 7.9 The energy levels of a particle in a box (a) become closer together as the width of the box is increased, (b) As a result, the number of levels accessible to the particles in the box increases, and the entropy of the system increases accordingly. Die range of thermally accessible levels is shown by the tinted band. The change from part (a) to part (b) is a model of the isothermal expansion of an ideal gas. The total energy of the particles is the same in each case. [Pg.400]

It should be mentioned that one can detect two types of equilibrium in the model of charge transfer in the absorbate - adsorbent system (i) complete transition of chemisorbed particles into the charged form and (ii) flattening of Fermi level of adsorbent and energy level of chemisorbed particles. The former type takes place in the case of substantially low concentration of adsorbed particles characterized by high affinity to electron compared to the work function of semiconductor (for acceptor adsorbates) or small value of ionization potential (for donor adsorbates). The latter type can take place for sufficiently large concentration of chemisorbed particles. [Pg.27]

Models for emulsion polymerization reactors vary greatly in their complexity. The level of sophistication needed depends upon the intended use of the model. One could distinguish between two levels of complexity. The first type of model simply involves reactor material and energy balances, and is used to predict the temperature, pressure and monomer concentrations in the reactor. Second level models cannot only predict the above quantities but also polymer properties such as particle size, molecular weight distribution (MWD) and branching frequency. In latex reactor systems, the level one balances are strongly coupled with the particle population balances, thereby making approximate level one models of limited value (1). [Pg.220]


See other pages where Model systems energy levels is mentioned: [Pg.98]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.1048]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.1071]    [Pg.1079]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.575]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.14]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.467 ]




SEARCH



Energy-level model

Leveling system

System level, modeling

System-level

© 2024 chempedia.info