Spherically symmetric model

Most theories of droplet combustion assume a spherical, symmetrical droplet surrounded by a spherical flame, for which the radii of the droplet and the flame are denoted by and respectively. The flame is supported by the fuel diffusing from the droplet surface and the oxidant from the outside. The heat produced in the combustion zone ensures evaporation of the droplet and consequently the fuel supply. Other assumptions that further restrict the model include (/) the rate of chemical reaction is much higher than the rate of diffusion and hence the reaction is completed in a flame front of infinitesimal thickness (2) the droplet is made up of pure Hquid fuel (J) the composition of the ambient atmosphere far away from the droplet is constant and does not depend on the combustion process (4) combustion occurs under steady-state conditions (5) the surface temperature of the droplet is close or equal to the boiling point of the Hquid and (6) the effects of radiation, thermodiffusion, and radial pressure changes are negligible. 

FIG. 19 Scheme of a simple fluid confined by a chemically heterogeneous model pore. Fluid modecules (grey spheres) are spherically symmetric. Each substrate consists of a sequence of crystallographic planes separated by a distance 8 along the z axis. The surface planes of the two opposite substrates are separated by a distance s,. Periodic boundary conditions are imposed in the x and y directions (see text) (from Ref. 77). 

Several colloidal systems, that are of practical importance, contain spherically symmetric particles the size of which changes continuously. Polydisperse fluid mixtures can be described by a continuous probability density of one or more particle attributes, such as particle size. Thus, they may be viewed as containing an infinite number of components. It has been several decades since the introduction of polydispersity as a model for molecular mixtures [73], but only recently has it received widespread attention [74-82]. Initially, work was concentrated on nearly monodisperse mixtures and the polydispersity was accounted for by the construction of perturbation expansions with a pure, monodispersive, component as the reference fluid [77,80]. Subsequently, Kofke and Glandt [79] have obtained the equation of state using a theory based on the distinction of particular species in a polydispersive mixture, not by their intermolecular potentials but by a specific form of the distribution of their chemical potentials. Quite recently, Lado [81,82] has generalized the usual OZ equation to the case of a polydispersive mixture. Recently, the latter theory has been also extended to the case of polydisperse quenched-annealed mixtures [83,84]. As this approach has not been reviewed previously, we shall consider it in some detail. 

The present chapter is organized as follows. We focus first on a simple model of a nonuniform associating fluid with spherically symmetric associative forces between species. This model serves us to demonstrate the application of so-called first-order (singlet) and second-order (pair) integral equations for the density profile. Some examples of the solution of these equations for associating fluids in contact with structureless and crystalline solid surfaces are presented. Then we discuss one version of the density functional theory for a model of associating hard spheres. All aforementioned issues are discussed in Sec. II. 

Friedel used the local perturbation f/—as a model for the scattering potential, reduced it even to one spherically symmetric scatterer and calculated the scattering by free electrons. By that, for the scatterer at the origin labeled by j = 0,... 

This model of the hydrogen atom accordingly consists of a nucleus embedded in a ball of negative electricity—the electron distributed through space. The atom is spherically symmetrical. The electron density is greatest at the nucleus, and decreases exponentially as r, the distance from the nucleus, increases. It remains finite, however, for all finite values of r, so that the atom extends to infinity the greater part of the atom, however, is near the nucleus—within 1 or 2 A. 

The ionic model, developed by Bom, Lande, and Lennard-Jones, enables lattice energies (U) to be summed from inverse square law interactions between spherically symmetrical charge distributions and interactions following higher inverse power laws. Formation enthalpies are related to calculated lattice energies in the familiar Bom-Haber cycle. For an alkali fluoride... 

The first neutron star model in GR was constructed by Oppenheimer and Volkoff (1939). They derived the equations governing a spherically symmetric stellar equilibrium in GR using a metric of the form... 

We will focus on static spherically symmetric stars which are described by the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkov equations. At low densities, up to a few times nuclear density no, matter consists of interacting hadrons. Theoretical models for this state have to start from various assumptions, as for the included states and their interactions. Naturally, the results for the hadronic equation of state become notably model dependent at densities exceeding approximately 2/io- This is reflected in uncertainties of the predictions for the shell structure of neutron stars, cf. [18]. 

Table II shows the average end-to-end distance over 20 ps for mannitol and sorbitol in vacuuo and in solution of an argon-like (L-J) solvent and SPC/E water. The average lengths all indicate sickle shapes, except for mannitol in water which is fully extended. This points to a specific solute-solvent interaction between mannitol and water, not just an unspecific solvent effect that is not present in solvent other than water. The model non-aqueous solvent is very artificial, but it should represent the main features of the class of non-polar, spherically symmetric solvents.

However, this is not the end of the story. Calcnlations carried ont in a spherically symmetric context mnst now be extended to inclnde clearly or subtly anisotropic effects, in order to model jets, rotation and the like. Three-dimensional numerical simulation is required. Astrophysicists should proht from considerable progress made in hydrodynamics with the development of extremely powerful lasers in France and the United States, but that is another Story. ... 

Hydrogen (H) is the simplest and lightest atom in the periodic table. We drink it every day it is an essential component of water in fact, hydro-gen means water-generating, It has played a crucial role in many developments of modern physics. In this book we will model the hydrogen atom by a single quantum particle (the electron) moving in a spherically symmetric force field (created by the proton in the nucleus). There are certainly more sophisticated models available — for example, it is more precise to model the hydrogen atom as the mutual interaction of two particles, a proton and an electron" — but our model is simple and quite accurate. 

Up to and including Chapter 7, we make very few assumptions in particular, we do not need to know the functional form of the force on the electron. We assume only that this force is spherically symmetric. Yet, armed with some powerful undergraduate-level mathematics (plus Fubini s Theorem and the Stone-Weierstrass Theorem), we can make meaningful predictions from the meager assumptions of the basic model of quantum mechanics and spherical symmetry. 

The conventional viewpoint, which assumes that the ionic atmosphere is spherically symmetric, does not take account of the inevitable effects of ionic polarization. From an analysis of the general solution (19), however, it is evident that the ionic atmosphere must be spherically symmetric for nonpolarizable ions, and the DH model is therefore adequate. (Moreover, in very dilute solution polarization effects are negligibly small, and it does not matter whether we choose a polarizable or unpolarizable sphere for our model.) But once we have made the realistic step of conferring a real size on an ion, the ion becomes to some extent polarizable, and the ionic cloud is expected to be nonspherical in any solution of appreciable concentration. Accordingly, we base our treatment on this central hypothesis, that the time-average picture of the ionic solution is best represented with a polarizable ion surrounded by a nonspherical atmosphere. In order to obtain a value for the potential from the general solution of the LPBE we must first consider the boundary conditions at the surface of the central ion. 

---