Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Mixing general characteristics

Phase transitions have been characterized in a number of different pure and mixed lipid systems. Table 9.1 shows a comparison of the transition temperatures observed for several different phosphatidylcholines with different fatty acyl chain compositions. General characteristics of bilayer phase transitions include the following ... [Pg.269]

General characteristics of the support to be considered are discussed in chapter 6 and those of relevance for the use of enzymes in non-conventional media are listed in Table 9.2. In addition, the specific surface area of the support is of special importance for the applications in non-conventional media. Inactivation can occur if the surface area is too large in relation to the amount of enzyme (Figure 9.3). In order to avoid inactivation at least a monolayer of enzyme molecules should be formed on the accessible surface (Wehtje, Adlercreutz and Mattiasson, 1993). For enzymes of high purity and high activity, the amount of enzyme needed is sometimes quite small. In such cases the enzyme can be mixed with a protecting protein before immobilisation to achieve at least a monolayer of protein and thereby avoid... [Pg.345]

Intermolecular Cavity Effect. Figure 5a shows the general characteristics of mixed monolayers in which the "intermolecular cavity effect ... [Pg.204]

Ion-Ion or Ion-Dipole Interaction. Figure 5b, shows the general characteristics of mixed monolayers in which ion-ion or ion-dipole interaction takes place—e.g., alkyl phosphate-alkyl trimethylammonium, or steric acid—octadecanol monolayers. The average area per molecule may or may not show a deviation from the additivity rule line, depending upon whether the two components form expanded or condensed mono-layers. However, surface potential per molecule must show a deviation from the additivity line since ion-ion or ion-dipole interactions reduce the average surface dipole of the molecules in mixed monolayers (31, 42). These interactions result in a negative deviation in the plot of log < vs. mole fraction (6). [Pg.205]

Hydrocarbon-Hydrocarbon Interaction. Figure 5c shows the general characteristics of mixed monolayers in which hydrocarbon-hydrocarbon interaction occurs—e.g., trimyristin-myristic acid monolayers (16). The average area per molecule shows a deviation, whereas the surface potential per molecule follows the additivity rule. Hydrocarbon-hydrocarbon interaction also increases the cohesive force in the lipid layer and therefore reduces the fluidity of the mixed monolayer. It is evident from Figures 3a and 3c that surface fluidity is the only parameter which distinguishes an intermolecular cavity effect from hydrocarbon-hydrocarbon interaction. [Pg.205]

Almost every kind of holding or contacting equipment has been used as a chemical reactor at some time, from mixing nozzles and centrifugal pumps to the most elaborate towers and tube assemblies. This section is devoted to the general characteristics of the main kinds of reactors, and also provides a gallery of selected examples of working reactors. [Pg.567]

II. General Characteristics of Mixing Processes and Agitated Vessels. .. 121... [Pg.119]

Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics calculations of the density profile of model system of benzene-water [70], 1,2-dichloroethane-water [71], and decane-water [72] interfaces show that the thickness of the transition region at the interface is molecu-larly sharp, typically within 0.5 nm, rather than diffuse (Fig. 4). A similar sharp density profile has been reported also at several liquid-vapor interfaces [73, 74]. The sharpness of interfaces thus seems to be a general characteristic of the boundary between two stable phases and it is likely that the presence of supporting electrolytes would not significantly alter the thickness of the transition region at an ITIES. The interfacial mixed solvent layer [54, 55], if any, would probably have a thickness comparable with this thin inner layer. [Pg.312]

Metal decoration is also a general characteristic feature. As shown in section 4.3.3.2, it has been observed in Rh, Pd and Pt catalysts supponed on ceria and all the investigated mixed oxides (Ce/Tb and Ce/Zr). It is important to stress, however, that the HREM studies have only provided unequivocal proofs of covering phenomena on catalysts reduced at temperatures well above 773 K, typically 973 K. [Pg.157]

Now we can try to put this all together to try to predict where else to look for new superconducting phases. The main themes that arise from the preceding discussion can be condensed into four general characteristics 1) A large cation-anion mixing of the wavefunctions near the Fermi level, 2) metallic conductor, but close to a Mott transition, 3)fast anion conductor, 4) the electropositive cations do not play an essential role in the electronic properties. For the sake of discussion, we can arbitrarily break these materials into oxides and other anion compounds. [Pg.57]

The most often found types of mixed oxides are perovskites (RBO3), K2NiF4-type oxides (R2BO4), R 1 B C>2 +1 ( = 2 or 3), lamellar perovskites, pyrochlores, spinels, and oxide solid solutions. Perovskite oxides are, by far, the most commonly used oxides. Therefore, this chapter will reflect this situation by putting more emphasis on this type of materials. Within this section the structure, preparation methods and general characteristics of the mixed oxides will be discussed. Note that R stands for rare-earth elements while A includes all types of elements. [Pg.76]

The temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) of oxygen has been thoroughly studied by a number or researchers, generally in connection with the catalytic application of mixed oxides. In what follows the general characteristics of TPD studies will be discussed with special emphasis on structural information. Those particular features pertaining to a given type of reaction will be dealt with in the next section. [Pg.86]

It is apparent from the illustrations given in Table 5.1, for example, that none of them will be able to reproduce the F t) or C t) response typical of channeling shown in Figure 5.1. Examination of this response indicates a bimodal C t), each peak of which is generally characteristic of a mixing-cell response with diflerent residence times. [Pg.357]


See other pages where Mixing general characteristics is mentioned: [Pg.278]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.765]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.608]    [Pg.578]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.767]    [Pg.492]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.181]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.121 , Pg.122 , Pg.123 , Pg.124 , Pg.125 , Pg.126 , Pg.127 , Pg.128 , Pg.129 , Pg.130 , Pg.131 , Pg.132 ]




SEARCH



General characteristics

Mixing characteristics

© 2024 chempedia.info