Mixed-flow reactor rate parameters from

Glaser and Litt (G4) have proposed, in an extension of the above study, a model for gas-liquid flow through a b d of porous particles. The bed is assumed to consist of two basic structures which influence the fluid flow patterns (1) Void channels external to the packing, with which are associated dead-ended pockets that can hold stagnant pools of liquid and (2) pore channels and pockets, i.e., continuous and dead-ended pockets in the interior of the particles. On this basis, a theoretical model of liquid-phase dispersion in mixed-phase flow is developed. The model uses three bed parameters for the description of axial dispersion (1) Dispersion due to the mixing of streams from various channels of different residence times (2) dispersion from axial diffusion in the void channels and (3) dispersion from diffusion into the pores. The model is not applicable to turbulent flow nor to such low flow rates that molecular diffusion is comparable to Taylor diffusion. The latter region is unlikely to be of practical interest. The model predicts that the reciprocal Peclet number should be directly proportional to nominal liquid velocity, a prediction that has been confirmed by a few determinations of residence-time distribution for a wax desulfurization pilot reactor of 1-in. diameter packed with 10-14 mesh particles. 

Values for the various parameters in these equations can be estimated from published correlations. See Suggestions for Further Reading. It turns out, however, that bubbling fluidized beds do not perform particularly well as chemical reactors. At or near incipient fluidization, the reactor approximates piston flow. The small catalyst particles give effectiveness factors near 1, and the pressure drop—equal to the weight of the catalyst—is moderate. However, the catalyst particles are essentially quiescent so that heat transfer to the vessel walls is poor. At higher flow rates, the bubbles promote mixing in the emulsion phase and enhance heat transfer, but at the cost of increased axial dispersion. 

Another Lagrangian-based description of micromixing is provided by multienvironment models. In these models, the well macromixed reactor is broken up into sub-grid-scale environments with uniform concentrations. A four-environment model is shown in Fig. 5.16. In this model, environment 1 contains unmixed fluid from feed stream 1 environments 2 and 3 contain partially mixed fluid and environment 4 contains unmixed fluid from feed stream 2. The user must specify the relative volume of each environment (possibly as a function of age), and the exchange rates between environments. While some qualitative arguments have been put forward to fit these parameters based on fluid dynamics and/or flow visualization, one has little confidence in the general applicability of these rules when applied to scale up or scale down, or to complex reactor geometries. 

Measurements of kinetic parameters of liquid-phase reactions can be performed in apparata without phase transition (rapid-mixing method [66], stopped-flow method [67], etc.) or in apparata with phase transition of the gaseous components (laminar jet absorber [68], stirred cell reactor [69], etc.). In experiments without phase transition, the studied gas is dissolved physically in a liquid and subsequently mixed with the liquid absorbent to be examined, in a way that ensures a perfect mixing. Afterwards, the reaction conversion is determined via the temperature evolution in the reactor (rapid mixing) or with an indicator (stopped flow). The reaction kinetics can then be deduced from the conversion. In experiments with phase transition, additionally, the phase equilibrium and mass transport must be taken into account as the gaseous component must penetrate into the liquid phase before it reacts. In the laminar jet absorber, a liquid jet of a very small diameter passes continuously through a chamber filled with the gas to be examined. In order to determine the reaction rate constant at a certain temperature, the jet length and diameter as well as the amount of gas absorbed per time unit must be known. 

The elegant work of Roux, Simoyi, Wolf, and Swinney established the reality of chemical chaos (Simoyi et al. 1982, Roux et al, 1983). They conducted an experiment on the BZ reaction in a continuous flow stirred tank reactor. In this standard set-up, fresh chemicals are pumped through the reactor at a constant rate to replenish the reactants and to keep the system far from equilibrium. The flow rate acts as a control parameter. The reaction is also stirred continuously to mix the chemicals. This enforces spatial homogeneity, thereby reducing the effective number of degrees of freedom. The behavior of the reaction is monitored by measuring S( ), the concentration of bromide ions. 

---