Michaelis-Menten enzyme substrate complexes

These experiments suggest that the secondary complexes should no longer be regarded as Michaelis-Menten enzyme substrate complexes but as reaction intermediates in the same sense that free radicals and semi-quinones are reaction intermediates, for all three classes of compounds provide a path for stepwise reactions. As a consequence the accepted mechanism for peroxidase action needs revision. 

Lenore Michaelis and Maud L. Menten proposed a general theory of enzyme action in 1913 consistent with observed enzyme kinetics. Their theory was based on the assumption that the enzyme, E, and its substrate, S, associate reversibly to form an enzyme-substrate complex, ES ... 

The interpretations of Michaelis and Menten were refined and extended in 1925 by Briggs and Haldane, by assuming the concentration of the enzyme-substrate complex ES quickly reaches a constant value in such a dynamic system. That is, ES is formed as rapidly from E + S as it disappears by its two possible fates dissociation to regenerate E + S, and reaction to form E + P. This assumption is termed the steady-state assumption and is expressed as... 

The kinetics of enzyme reactions were first studied by the German chemists Leonor Michaelis and Maud Menten in the early part of the twentieth century. They found that, when the concentration of substrate is low, the rate of an enzyme-catalyzed reaction increases with the concentration of the substrate, as shown in the plot in Fig. 13.41. However, when the concentration of substrate is high, the reaction rate depends only on the concentration of the enzyme. In the Michaelis-Menten mechanism of enzyme reaction, the enzyme, E, and substrate, S, reach a rapid preequilibrium with the bound enzyme-substrate complex, ES ... 

Although the Michaelis-Menten equation is applicable to a wide variety of enzyme catalyzed reactions, it is not appropriate for reversible reactions and multiple-substrate reactions. However, the generalized steady-state analysis remains applicable. Consider the case of reversible decomposition of the enzyme-substrate complex into a product molecule and enzyme with mechanistic equations. 

The kinetics of the general enzyme-catalyzed reaction (equation 10.1-1) may be simple or complex, depending upon the enzyme and substrate concentrations, the presence/absence of inhibitors and/or cofactors, and upon temperature, shear, ionic strength, and pH. The simplest form of the rate law for enzyme reactions was proposed by Henri (1902), and a mechanism was proposed by Michaelis and Menten (1913), which was later extended by Briggs and Haldane (1925). The mechanism is usually referred to as the Michaelis-Menten mechanism or model. It is a two-step mechanism, the first step being a rapid, reversible formation of an enzyme-substrate complex, ES, followed by a slow, rate-determining decomposition step to form the product and reproduce the enzyme ... 

A kinetic description of large reaction networks entirely in terms of elementary reactionsteps is often not suitable in practice. Rather, enzyme-catalyzed reactions are described by simplified overall reactions, invoking several reasonable approximations. Consider an enzyme-catalyzed reaction with a single substrate The substrate S binds reversibly to the enzyme E, thereby forming an enzyme substrate complex [/iS ]. Subsequently, the product P is irreversibly dissociated from the enzyme. The resulting scheme, named after L. Michaelis and M. L. Menten [152], can be depicted as... 

It has been found experimentally that in most cases v is directly proportional to the concentration of enzyme [.E0] and that v generally follows saturation kinetics with respect to the concentration of substrate [limiting value called Vmax. This is expressed quantitatively in the Michaelis-Menten equation originally proposed by Michaelis and Menten. Km can be seen as an apparent dissociation constant for the enzyme-substrate complex ES. The maximal velocity Vmax = kcat E0. ... 

The concept of an enzyme-substrate complex is fundamental to the appreciation of enzyme reactions and was initially developed in 1913 by Michaelis and Menten, who derived an equation that is crucial to enzyme studies. Subsequent to Michaelis and Menten several other workers approached the problem from different viewpoints and although their work is particularly useful in advanced kinetic and mechanistic studies, they confirmed the basic concepts of Michaelis and Menten. 

Analyses of enzyme reaction rates continued to support the formulations of Henri and Michaelis-Menten and the idea of an enzyme-substrate complex, although the kinetics would still be consistent with adsorption catalysis. Direct evidence for the participation of the enzyme in the catalyzed reaction came from a number of approaches. From the 1930s analysis of the mode of inhibition of thiol enzymes—especially glyceraldehyde-phosphate dehydrogenase—by iodoacetate and heavy metals established that cysteinyl groups within the enzyme were essential for its catalytic function. The mechanism by which the SH group participated in the reaction was finally shown when sufficient quantities of purified G-3-PDH became available (Chapter 4). 

The answer to question 1 was provided by L. Michaelis and M.L. Menten in 1913. The mechanism is, in fact, very simple. The enzyme, E, binds the substrate S to produce an enzyme-substrate complex, which then breaks down to give rise to the product, P, and the free enzyme ... 

In the absence of an enzyme, the reaction rate v is proportional to the concentration of substance A (top). The constant k is the rate constant of the uncatalyzed reaction. Like all catalysts, the enzyme E (total concentration [E]t) creates a new reaction pathway, initially, A is bound to E (partial reaction 1, left), if this reaction is in chemical equilibrium, then with the help of the law of mass action—and taking into account the fact that [E]t = [E] + [EA]—one can express the concentration [EA] of the enzyme-substrate complex as a function of [A] (left). The Michaelis constant lknow that kcat > k—in other words, enzyme-bound substrate reacts to B much faster than A alone (partial reaction 2, right), kcat. the enzyme s turnover number, corresponds to the number of substrate molecules converted by one enzyme molecule per second. Like the conversion A B, the formation of B from EA is a first-order reaction—i. e., V = k [EA] applies. When this equation is combined with the expression already derived for EA, the result is the Michaelis-Menten equation. 

Another instance where first-order kinetics applies is the conversion of reversible enzyme-substrate complex (ES) to regenerate free enzyme (E) plus product (P) as part of the Michaelis-Menten scheme ... 

Another term used to indicate a rapid equilibrium assumption in a kinetic process. The most prominent example in biochemistry is the assumption that enzyme and substrate rapidly form a preequilibrium enzyme-substrate complex in the Michaelis-Menten treatment. 

The Michaelis-Menten mechanism assumes that the enzyme-substrate complex is in thermodynamic equilibrium with free enzyme and substrate. This is true only if, in the following scheme, k2 < ... 

It is extremely common for intermediates to occur after the initial enzyme-substrate complex, as in equation 3.19. However, it is often found for physiological substrates that these intermediates do not accumulate and that the slow step in equation 3.19 is k2. (A theoretical reason for this is discussed in Chapter 12, where examples are given.) Under these conditions, KM is equal to Ks, the dissociation constant, and the original Michaelis-Menten mechanism is obeyed to all intents and purposes. The opposite occurs in many laboratory experiments. The enzyme kineticist often uses synthetic, highly reactive substrates to assay enzymes, and covalent intermediates frequently accumulate. 

In the simple Michaelis-Menten mechanism in which there is only, one enzyme-substrate complex and all binding steps are fast, cat is simply the first-order rate constant for the chemical conversion of the ES complex to the EP... 

Although it is only for the simple Michaelis-Menten mechanism or in similar cases that Ku = Ks, the true dissociation constant of the enzyme-substrate complex, Km may be treated for some purposes as an apparent dissociation constant. For example, the concentration of free enzyme in solution may be calculated from the relationship... 

It should also be noted that kf2 is equivalent to kat in the Michaelis-Menten rapid-equilibrium hypothesis when the decomposition rate of the enzyme-substrate complex is fast, as described above in Scheme 1. However, the value of kcax may be attributable to more complex situations involving several decomposition terms. 

Reversible inhibition occurs rapidly in a system which is near its equilibrium point and its extent is dependent on the concentration of enzyme, inhibitor and substrate. It remains constant over the period when the initial reaction velocity studies are performed. In contrast, irreversible inhibition may increase with time. In simple single-substrate enzyme-catalysed reactions there are three main types of inhibition patterns involving reactions following the Michaelis-Menten equation competitive, uncompetitive and non-competitive inhibition. Competitive inhibition occurs when the inhibitor directly competes with the substrate in forming the enzyme complex. Uncompetitive inhibition involves the interaction of the inhibitor with only the enzyme-substrate complex, while non-competitive inhibition occurs when the inhibitor binds to either the enzyme or the enzyme-substrate complex without affecting the binding of the substrate. The kinetic modifications of the Michaelis-Menten equation associated with the various types of inhibition are shown below. The derivation of these equations is shown in Appendix S.S. 

The fundamental equation in enzyme kinetics is the Michaelis-Menten equation. These workers worked on the hypothesis that the reaction proceeds through an enzyme-substrate complex (ES) that forms rapidly from the free enzyme (E) and the substrate (S) and may be described by an equilibrium (or Michaelis) constant AT/. Upon reaction, the ES complex then decomposes and is converted to product by a rate-determining step with a rate constant Acat. The scheme is shown below ... 

The Henri-Michaelis-Menten Treatment Assumes That the Enzyme-Substrate Complex Is in Equilibrium with Free Enzyme and Substrate Steady-State Kinetic Analysis Assumes That the Concentration of the Enzyme-Substrate Complex Remains Nearly Constant Kinetics of Enzymatic Reactions Involving Two Substrates... 

The Henri-Michaelis-Menten Treatment Assumes That the Enzyme-Substrate Complex Is in Equilibrium with Free Enzyme and Substrate... 

The hyperbolic saturation curve that is commonly seen with enzymatic reactions led Leonor Michaelis and Maude Men-ten in 1913 to develop a general treatment for kinetic analysis of these reactions. Following earlier work by Victor Henri, Michaelis and Menten assumed that an enzyme-substrate complex (ES) is in equilibrium with free enzyme... 

Equation (18) is the Henri-Michaelis-Menten equation, which relates the reaction velocity to the maximum velocity, the substrate concentration, and the dissociation constant for the enzyme-substrate complex. Usually substrate is present in much higher molar concentration than enzyme, and the initial period of the reaction is examined so that the free substrate concentration [S] is approximately equal to the total substrate added to the reaction mixture. 

Steady-state approximation is based on the concept that the formation of [ES] complex by binding of substrate to free enzyme and breakdown of [ES] to form product plus free enzyme occur at equal rates. A graphical representation of the relative concentrations of free enzyme, substrate, enzyme-substrate complex, and product is shown in figure 7.8 in the text. Derivation of the Michaelis-Menten expression is based on the steady-state assumption. Steady-state approximation may be assumed until the substrate concentration is depleted, with a concomitant decrease in the concentration of [ES]. 

Corey also pointed out that 16 reflects the transition-state of an enzyme-substrate complex. Its formation was later supported by the observation of Michaelis-Menten-type kinetics in dihydroxylation reactions and in competitive inhibition studies [37], This kinetic behavior was held responsible for the non-linearity in the Eyring diagrams, which would otherwise be inconsistent with a concerted mechanism. Contrary, Sharpless stated that the observed Michaelis-Menten behavior in the catalytic AD would result from a step other than osmylation. Kinetic studies on the stoichiometric AD of styrene under conditions that replicate the organic phase of the catalytic AD had revealed that the rate expression was clearly first-order in substrate over a wide range of concentrations [38],... 

The kinetic scheme according to Michaelis-Menten for a one-substrate reaction (Michaelis, 1913) assumes three possible elementary reaction steps (i) formation of an enzyme-substrate complex (ES complex), (ii) dissociation of the ES complex into E and S, and (iii) irreversible reaction to product P. In this scheme, the product formation step from ES to E + P is assumed to be rate-limiting, so the ES complex is modeled to react directly to the free enzyme and the product molecule, which is assumed to dissociate from the enzyme without the formation of an enzyme-product (EP) complex [Eq. (2.2)]. 

In the derivation according to Michaelis and Menten, association and dissociation between free enzyme E, free substrate S, and the enzyme-substrate complex ES are assumed to be at equilibrium, fCs = [ES]/([E] [S]). [The Briggs-Haldane derivation (1925), based on the assumption of a steady state, is more general see Chapter 5, Section 5.2.1.] With this assumption and a mass balance over all enzyme components ([E]total = [E]free + [ES]), the rate law in Eq. (2.3) can be derived. 

Originally published in 1913 as a rate law for enzymatic sugar inversion [19], the Michaelis-Menten rate equation is also used frequently for describing homogeneously catalyzed reactions. It describes a two-step cycle (Eqs. (2.34) and (2.35)) the catalyst (the enzyme, E) first reacts reversibly with the substrate S, forming an enzyme-substrate complex ES (a catalytic intermediate). Subsequently, ES decomposes, giving the enzyme E and the product P. This second step is irreversible. 

In Equation (5.17), the ratio of constants (k2 + k3)/kx has been replaced by a single constant, the Michaelis-Menten constant, Km. Km is therefore approximately equal to the dissociation constant of the enzyme-substrate complex (ES). 

Competitive inhibition occurs, when substrate and inhibitor compete for binding at the same active site at the enzyme. Based on the Michaelis-Menten kinetics, Vmax is unchanged whereas Km increases. In case of noncompetive inhibition, the inhibitor and the substrate bind to different sites at the enzyme. Vmax decrease whereas the Km value is unaffected. Binding of the inhibitor only to the enzyme-substrate complex is described as uncompetitive inhibition. Both, Vmax and Km decrease. Finally, mixed (competitive-noncompetitive) inhibition occurs, either the inhibitor binds to the active or to another site on the enzyme, or the inhibitor binds to the active site but does not block the binding of the substrate. 

Briggs and Haldane in 1925 examined the earlier Michaelis-Menten analysis and made an important development. Instead of assuming that the first stage of the reaction was at equilibrium, they merely assumed, for all intents and purposes, that the concentration of the enzyme-substrate complex scarcely changed with time i.e., it was in a steady state. Written mathematically, this amounts to... 

This is an important question that has been addressed by many enzyme kineticists over the years. For the correct application of the Briggs-Haldane steady-state analysis, in a closed system, [S]0 must be >[E](), where the > sign implies a factor of at least 1,000. M. F. Chaplin in 1981 noted that the expression v0= V max[S]c/(Km + [S]0 + [E]0) yields, for example, only a 1 percent error in the estimate of v() for [S]0 = 10 x [E]0 and [S]0 = 0.1 Km the expression thus applies under much less stringent conditions than does the simple Michaelis-Menten equation. In open systems [S]0 can approximate [E]0 and a steady state of enzyme-substrate complexes can pertain computer simulation of both types of system is the best way to gain insight into the conditions necessary for a steady state of the complex. 

The kinetic parameters for a free enzyme in solution are readily derived using the Michaelis-Menten approach describing pseudo-steady-state conversions. Consider Equation (31.1) representing the conversion of a substrate S into a product P, catalyzed by an enzyme E. The rate of formation of an enzyme/substrate complex, ES, is denoted as ku the reverse reaction by and the rate of subsequent conversion to the free product by k2. 

If we set up the same enzyme assay with a fixed amount of enzyme but vary the substrate concentration we will observe that initial velocity (va) will steadily increase as we increase substrate concentration ([S]) but at very high [S] the va will asymptote towards a maximal value referred to as the Vmax (or maximal velocity). A plot of va versus [S] will yield a hyperbola, that is, v0 will increase until it approaches a maximal value. The initial velocity va is directly proportional to the amount of enzyme—substrate complex (E—S) and accordingly when all the available enzyme (total enzyme or E j) has substrate bound (i.e. E—S = E i -S and the enzyme is completely saturated ) we will observe a maximal initial velocity (Pmax)- The substrate concentration for half-maximal velocity (i.e. the [S] when v0 = Vmax/2) is termed the Km (or the Michaelis—Menten constant). However because va merely asymptotes towards fT ax as we increase [S] it is difficult to accurately determine Vmax or Am by this graphical method. However such accurate determinations can be made based on the Michaelis-Menten equation that describes the relationship between v() and [S],... 

---