Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Methylvinyl radical

The formation of the propargyl radical indicates that hydrogen abstraction from allene has occurred. However it was shown in a separate experiment that the 1 -methylvinyl radical abstracts hydrogen very easily from allene to form the propargyl radical. (The 1-methylvinyl radical was prepared from 2-bromopropene and sodium and then bombarded with allene). Thus it is unnecessary to postulate that hydrogen atoms can abstract hydrogen directly from allene. [Pg.59]

The methylvinyl radical (IV) can abstract a hydrogen atom from a feed or product molecule to form propylene or it can lose a hydrogen atom to form allene or propadiene as products. For the 2-butenes, steric factors inhibit methyl radical addition thus C5 products are formed to a far lesser extent than from 1-butene. While ethylene may be formed by a sequential decomposition of propylene, this cannot be the only path for its formation, as the yield of ethylene in the high conversion region increases about twice as rapidly as does the methane yield. An additional source of ethylene is the symmetrical cleavage of butadiene to vinyl radicals. [Pg.42]

The hfs caused by the protons on the methyl group of the 1-methylcyclopropyl radical would seem to be quite similar to that of the 1-methylvinyl radical (19.48 G) [11a], which was also shown to be a bent c radical. The net difference of between the cyclopropyl ( — 6.7 G) and vinyl radicals (-1-13.4 G) [11a] also indicates that the vinyl radical is more bent than the cyclopropyl radical. The rate constants for the inversion of both cyclopropyl and 1-methylcyclopropyl radicals were also determined [14] by chemical... [Pg.148]

Abstraction followed by reaction with O2 leads to formation of the peroxymethacryloyl radical (CH2C(CH3)C(0)02), which reacts with NO2 [A<298) = 1.2 x 10 cm molecule s ] to form the peroxynitrate, or with NO [A (298) = 3 x 10 cm molecule s ], to form the oxy radical, which dissociates to form methylvinyl + CO2. A major focus of the work of Orlando et al. was the fate of the methylvinyl radical, which they proposed reacts with O2 to form acetyl + CH2O or methyl + CO + CH2O. [Pg.611]

Grant et a/.397 examined the reactions of hydroxy radicals with a range of vinyl and a-methylvinyl monomers in organic media. Hydroxy radicals on reaction with AMS give significant yields of products from head addition, abstraction and aromatic substitution (Table 3.8) even though resonance and steric factors combine to favor "normal tail addition. However, it is notable that the extents of abstraction (with AMS and MMA) arc less than obtained with t-butoxy radicals and the amounts of head addition (with MMA and S) are no greater than those seen with benzoyloxy radicals under similar conditions. It is clear that there is no direct correlation between reaclion rale and low specificity. [Pg.128]

When considering the stability of spin-delocalized radicals the use of isodesmic reaction Eq. 1 presents one further problem, which can be illustrated using the 1-methyl allyl radical 24. The description of this radical through resonance structures 24a and 24b indicates that 24 may formally be considered to either be a methyl-substituted allyl radical or a methylvinyl-substituted methyl radical. While this discussion is rather pointless for a delocalized, resonance-stabilized radical such as 24, there are indeed two options for the localized closed shell reference compound. When selecting 1-butene (25) as the closed shell parent, C - H abstraction at the C3 position leads to 24 with a radical stabilization energy of - 91.3 kj/mol, while C - H abstraction from the Cl position of trans-2-butene (26) generates the same radical with a RSE value of - 79.5 kj/mol (Scheme 6). The difference between these two values (12 kj/mol) reflects nothing else but the stability difference of the two parents 25 and 26. [Pg.191]

Monomer syntheses and their industrial polymerization and copolymerization were initiated in the thirties by IG Farbenindustrie, now BASF, and this company is still the main producer. Other companies, as GAF Corporation and Union Carbide in the United States or ICI in the United Kingdom came on the market at a later time. Actually BASF is the only producer of homopolymers, whereas copolymers are manufactured by BASF and GAF Co. We shall not consider here the synthesis of the industrial copolymers of methylvinyl ether and maleic anhydride (Gantrez-GAF, Sokalan-BASF), of isobutylvinyl ether and vinyl chloride (Laroflex MP 15-60, BASF), and of isobutylvinyl ether and acrylic monomers (Acro-nal, BASF) as they are produced by radical copolymerization. [Pg.711]

Free-radical additions to alkynes generate vinyl radicals (equation 1) and information about the structure of these intermediates has been obtained either by spectroscopic or chemical means. Vinylic intermediates are generally cr-type radicals (1), in which the unpaired electron is in an orbital with substantial s character. The degree of bending and the inversion barrier depends on the a-substituent. That is, for vinyl (R=H) the rate constant for the inversion lies between 3 x 10 and 3 x 10 s at -180 °C, whereas 1-methylvinyl inverts somewhat more slowly. Electronegative substituents, such as alkoxy, increase the barrier of inversion. ... [Pg.918]

The 1-1 copolymer of maleic anhydride and methylvinyl ether were commercial products and were used without fractionnation. The copolymers of maleic anhydride and decyl (or) hexadecyl vinyl ether were obtained by radical polymerization. For hydrolysis of the polymers with a long alkyl side chain, heat treatment was necessary (60 C for several days in pure water). This resulted however in a reduction of average DP and probably in an enlargement of the initial distribution. Therefore, after hydrolysis, the polymer sample was fractionated with 2 1 acetonerbenzene as solvent and methanol as precipitant. [Pg.226]

Within a series of vinyl or a-methylvinyl monomers, 5 apparently decreases according to the radical-stahihzing ahihty of the substituent. [Pg.6938]

Within a series of vinyl or a-methylvinyl monomers, fetd/fetr appears to decrease as the ability of the substiment to stabilize a radical center increases. Thus, fe j/fetc for radicals C( )(CH3)X or C( )HX decreases in the series where X is C02R> CN>Ph. [Pg.95]

Polysilazanes with Vinyl Substituents. Little fundamental work has been described on the peroxide crosslinking of polysilazanes. In 1984, it was reported that simple organooligocyclosilazanes, prepared by the polycondensation of methylvinyl-cyclosilazanes, could be crosslinked by heating to 220°C with 0.5-2.5 wt% of the silylperoxide (MeSiOOfBuO)x (28), Even for the highest levels of peroxide, only about 60% of the liquid silazane could be converted to a gel. Still, diis work demonstrated the potential for crosslinking vinyl-substituted polysilazanes using a free radical approach. [Pg.46]


See other pages where Methylvinyl radical is mentioned: [Pg.59]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.1067]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.1067]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.341]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.35 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info