Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Methanol desorption

As with methanol desorption, a net weight loss was observed for the FeHo catalyst after ammonia desorption. This was caused by oxidation of the ammonia substrate to nitrogen and consequent catalyst reduction. The relative number of oxygen atoms removed was ca. 20 less than with methanol surface reduction. [Pg.202]

The rate expression can be simplified if the assumption is made that methanol desorption is the rate-limiting step on a Cu/Zn0/Al203 catalyst ... [Pg.99]

A related strategy was suggested in which one of the reactants is attached via a linker to tetrabenzo[a,c,g,i]fluorene (Tbf). The reaction product can now be purified by taking advantage of the high affinity of Tbf to charcoal in polar solvents (mixture of DCM and methanol). Desorption can be affected with non polar solvents such as toluene [144]. The method was exemplified by the synthesis of a quinolone carboxylic acid derivative (ciprofloxacin). [Pg.119]

The analysis of NMR spectra of high resolution in solid phase as well as the results of mass-spectrometry investigation of water and methanol desorption from trimethylsilylated aerosil surface with no OH-groups [64,115] testify a nonhydroxylic nature of the sites of adsorption of small water amounts. A correspondence has been fixed of three characteristic regions of the sorbed water and methanol elimination with desorption maxima related to probable destruction of hydrogen-bonded (low-temperature maximum) and coordinate adsorption complexes of various structure (high-temperature maximum) by the help of desorption-field mass-spectrometry [116,117]. [Pg.341]

Fig. 8.20 Energy spectrum of aqueous methanol desorption = 0), a Ma/Macr = 2, b Ma/ Macr = 12, c Ma/Macr =13... Fig. 8.20 Energy spectrum of aqueous methanol desorption = 0), a Ma/Macr = 2, b Ma/ Macr = 12, c Ma/Macr =13...
Catalytic gas-phase reactions play an important role in many bulk chemical processes, such as in the production of methanol, ammonia, sulfuric acid, and nitric acid. In most processes, the effective area of the catalyst is critically important. Since these reactions take place at surfaces through processes of adsorption and desorption, any alteration of surface area naturally causes a change in the rate of reaction. Industrial catalysts are usually supported on porous materials, since this results in a much larger active area per unit of reactor volume. [Pg.47]

The reason for enhancement of adsorption performance of PA/AC was considered to be due to combination effect of increase of BET surface area and chemical modification by the treatment with PA. Consequently, lwt%-PA/AC was determined to be a best candidate as an adsorbent for removing benzene, toluene, p-xylene, methanol, ethanol, and iso-propanol. Therefore, lwt%-PA/AC was used as the adsorbent to investigate the adsorption isotherm, adsorption and desorption performance. [Pg.459]

This is illustrated by the TPD spectra of formate adsorbed on Cu(lOO). To prove that formate is a reaction intermediate in the synthesis of methanol from CO2 and H2, a Cu(lOO) surface was subjected to methanol synthesis conditions and the TPD spectra recorded (lower traces of Fig. 7.13). For comparison, the upper traces represent the decomposition of formate obtained by dosing formic acid on the surface. As both CO2 and H2 desorb at significantly lower temperatures than those of the peaks in Fig. 7.13, the measurements represent decomposition-limited desorptions. Hence, the fact that both decomposition profiles are identical is strong evidence that formate is present under methanol synthesis conditions. [Pg.285]

Analysis of soils and sediments is typically performed with aqueous extraction followed by headspace analysis or the purge-and-trap methods described above. Comparison of these two methods has found them equally suited for on-site analysis of soils (Hewitt et al. 1992). The major limitation of headspace analysis has been incomplete desorption of trichloroethylene from the soil matrix, although this was shown to be alleviated by methanol extraction (Pavlostathis and Mathavan 1992). [Pg.239]

We have also carried out preliminary experiments in which we have detected the laser desorption of ethylene, cyanogen, methanol, and benzene from the Pt(s)[7(111) x (100)] surface. These spectra are shown in Figure 9. In the experiments involving ethylene, cyanogen, and methanol only neutral species are desorbed. In the case of benzene we observe the molecular parent ion in the absence of the electron beam. We believe that this is due to resonance multiphoton ionization of the benzene by the laser after desorption (resonance multiphoton ionization of benzene is very efficient with 249 nm radiation). These spectra are in marked contrast to the results of SIMS experiments which produce a wide variety of complex metal-adsorbate cluster ions. In the case of ethylene, our experiments were performed at 140 K, and under these conditions ethylene is known to be a molecular x-bonded species on the surface. In SIMS under these conditions the predominant species is CH (15)t but in the laser desorption FTMS experiments neutral ethylene is the principal species detected at low laser power. [Pg.249]

The crucial aspect is thus to determine the fate of the ( CHO), species. Possible mechanisms for its oxidative removal are schematically shown in Fig. 9. From this scheme, it appears that the desorption of the formyl species can follow different pathways through competitive reactions. This schematic illustrates the main problems and challenges in improving the kinetics of the electrooxidation of methanol. On a pure platinum surface, step (21) is spontaneously favored, since the formation of adsorbed CO is a fast process, even at low potentials. Thus, the coverage... [Pg.81]

Specific surface areas of the catalysts used were determined by nitrogen adsorption (77.4 K) employing BET method via Sorptomatic 1900 (Carlo-Erba). X-ray difiraction (XRD) patterns of powdered catalysts were carried out on a Siemens D500 (0 / 20) dififactometer with Cu K monochromatic radiation. For the temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) experiments the catalyst (0.3 g) was pre-treated at diflferent temperatures (100-700 °C) under helium flow (5-20 Nml min ) in a micro-catalytic tubular reactor for 3 hours. The treated sample was exposed to methanol vapor (0.01-0.10 kPa) for 2 hours at 260 °C. The system was cooled at room temperature under helium for 30 minutes and then heated at the rate of 4 °C min . Effluents were continuously analyzed using a quadruple mass spectrometer (type QMG420, Balzers AG). [Pg.173]

Figure 8 Desorption of DME in the TPD process of methanol comparison between y-alumina... Figure 8 Desorption of DME in the TPD process of methanol comparison between y-alumina...
In the original proposal of the dual-pathway mechanism (for formic acid oxidation, see [Capon and Parsons, 1973a, b, c] for methanol oxidation, see [Parsons and VanderNoot, 1988 Jarvi and Stuve, 1998 Leung and Weaver, 1990 Lopes et al., 1991 Herrero et al., 1994, 1995]), both pathways lead to CO2 as the final product, as illustrated in the reaction scheme depicted in Fig. 13.8a [Jarvi and Smve, 1998]. In this mechanism, desorption of incomplete oxidation products was not included. The existence of a direct reaction pathway for methanol oxidation, following the dual-pathway mechanism, was justified by the observation of a methanol oxidation current at potentials where COad oxidation is not yet active [Sriramulu et al., 1998, 1999 Herrero et al., 1994, 1995]. The validity of this interpretation was questioned, however, by Vielstich and Xia (1995), who claimed that CO2 formation is observed only with the onset of COad oxidation and that the faradaic current measured at lower potentials is due to the formation of the incomplete oxidation products formaldehyde and formic acid. The latter findings were later confirmed by Wang et al. [2001], Korzeniewski and Childers [1998], and Jusys et al. [2001, 2003]. In more... [Pg.443]

Gilman S. 1963. The mechanism of electrochemical oxidation of carbon monoxide and methanol on platinum. I. Carbon monoxide adsorption and desorption and simultaneous oxidation of the platinum surface at constant potential. J Phys Chem 67 1989-1905. [Pg.457]


See other pages where Methanol desorption is mentioned: [Pg.172]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.552]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.552]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.931]    [Pg.127]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.186 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info