Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Metal surfaces, electronic structure correlation

Basis Sets Correlation Consistent Sets Benchmark Studies on Small Molecules Complete Active Space Self-consistent Field (CASSCF) Second-order Perturbation Theory (CASPT2) Configuration Interaction Configuration Interaction PCI-X and Applications Core-Valence Correlation Effects Coupled-cbister Theory Density Functional Applications Density Functional Theory (DFT), Har-tree-Fock (HF), and the Self-consistent Field Density Functional Theory Applications to Transition Metal Problems Electronic Structure of Meted and Mixed Nonstoi-chiometric Clusters G2 Theory Gradient Theory Heats of Formation Hybrid Methods Metal Complexes Relativistic Effective Core Potential Techniques for Molecules Containing Very Heavy Atoms Relativistic Theory and Applications Semiempiriced Methetds Transition Metals Surface Chemi-ced Bond Transition Meted Chemistry. [Pg.3093]

AFM measures the spatial distribution of the forces between an ultrafme tip and the sample. This distribution of these forces is also highly correlated with the atomic structure. STM is able to image many semiconductor and metal surfaces with atomic resolution. AFM is necessary for insulating materials, however, as electron conduction is required for STM in order to achieve tiumelling. Note that there are many modes of operation for these instruments, and many variations in use. In addition, there are other types of scaiming probe microscopies under development. [Pg.310]

The ability of bimetallic systems to enhance various reactions, by increasing the activity, selectivity, or both, has produced a great deal of interest in understanding the different roles and relative importance of ensemble and electronic effects. Deposition of one metal onto the single-crystal face of another provides an advantage by which the electronic and chemical properties of a well-defined bimetallic surface can be correlated with the atomic structure.5 22 23 Besenbacher et al.24 used this method to study steam reforming (the reverse of the CO methanation process) on Ni(l 11) surfaces... [Pg.340]

The description of bonding at transition metal surfaces presented here has been based on a combination of detailed experiments and quantitative theoretical treatments. Adsorption of simple molecules on transition metal surfaces has been extremely well characterized experimentally both in terms of geometrical structure, vibrational properties, electronic structure, kinetics, and thermo-chemistry [1-3]. The wealth of high-quality experimental data forms a unique basis for the testing of theoretical methods, and it has become clear that density functional theory calculations, using a semi-local description of exchange and correlation effects, can provide a semi-quantitative description of surface adsorption phenomena [4-6]. Given that the DFT calculations describe reality semi-quantitatively, we can use them as a basis for the analysis of catalytic processes at surfaces. [Pg.256]

The electronic structure of a solid metal or semiconductor is described by the band theory that considers the possible energy states of delocalized electrons in the crystal lattice. An apparent difficulty for the application of band theory to solid state catalysis is that the theory describes the situation in an infinitely extended lattice whereas the catalytic process is located on an external crystal surface where the lattice ends. In attempting to develop a correlation between catalytic surface processes and the bulk electronic properties of catalysts as described by the band theory, the approach taken in the following pages will be to assume a correlation between bulk and surface electronic properties. For example, it is assumed that lack of electrons in the bulk results in empty orbitals in the surface conversely, excess electrons in the bulk should result in occupied orbitals in the surface (7). This principle gains strong support from the consistency of the description thus achieved. In the following, the principle will be applied to supported catalysts. [Pg.2]

Several forms of the superoxide 02 radical ion formed on the surface of ZnO, MgO, CoO/MgO and Si02 have been reported in [40, 83]. The species were differed by the orientation of the 0-0 residue relatively the surface and the metal ion Mn+. The correlation between distances and angles in the most probable structures with the experimentally measured gz values was found, and the dynamic behaviour observed in some cases was also discussed [83], Calculated EPR spectra of the adsorbed 02 for different charges of the metal ion Mn+ (2 < n < 6) showed that gz values are sensitive to the ionic charge and the increase of n+ causes the decrease of gz [83]. The z-axis of the tensor is usually in the direction of the internuclear axis and the x- direction is that of the mole-cular orbital hosting the unpaired electron. The data in Table 8.3 show that the dependen-ce of gz on n+ is, however, valid quantitatively not always because of rather many factors affecting the gz value (distances to the neighbouring atoms, orientation, local fields, etc.). Additional detailed information can be found in references cited in this section. [Pg.211]

The correlations established in recent years between the electronic structure of metals and of semiconductors with their activities as surface catalysts will be dealt with in future volumes of the Advances. [Pg.496]

A variation of XANES or NEXAFS has been used to determine the structure of molecules chemisorbed on surfaces. In this approach photoemitted electrons excite molecular orbitals in the chemisorbed molecules. By varying the polarization of the incident photons, molecular orientation can be determined from selection rules for excitation. The bond lengths can be determined from a quasi-empirical correlation between bond-length and the shift in the molecular orbital excitation energy. This technique has been used to study the chemisorption of several hydrocarbon molecules on different metal surfaces./17/... [Pg.30]


See other pages where Metal surfaces, electronic structure correlation is mentioned: [Pg.9]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.598]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.624]    [Pg.637]    [Pg.714]    [Pg.942]    [Pg.2223]    [Pg.2228]    [Pg.808]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.650]    [Pg.289]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.618 ]




SEARCH



Correlated electrons

Correlation electron

Electronic correlations

Electronic structure, metals surfaces

Electronic structures, metals

Metallic correlation

Metals correlations

Structural correlation

Surface electron structure

Surface electronic

Surface electrons

Surfaces electronic structure

© 2024 chempedia.info