Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Metal-semiconductor photocatalysts reactions

After some general remarks on the relations between semiconductor properties and their use as photocatalysts, this text will first deal with oxidations of organic compounds.The interactions of illuminated semiconductors with gaseous C>2 (and, for comparison, with gaseous NO) will be then presented, whereas the last part will consider metal/semiconductor photocatalysts and the organic reactions they allow. In this presentation, the results of this laboratory will be highlighted. [Pg.23]

Recently was estimated an expected impact on the global chemistry of the atmosphere of the indirect heterogeneous photocatalytic reactions under the much more abundant near ultraviolet, visible and near infrared solar light [2]. As photocatalysts may serve atmospheric aerosols, i.e. ultrasmall solid particles that sometimes are embedded into liquid droplets. Aerosols are known to contain Ti02, Fc203, ZnO and other natural oxides, as well as metal sulfides of volcanic or antropogenic origin, that may serve as semiconductor photocatalysts (see Fig.5). Aerosols are known to be concentrated mainly in the air layers near the surface of the Earth, i.e. in the troposphere, rather than stratosphere. [Pg.49]

Various pairs of inorganic ions such as lOsVr, Fe /Fe, and Ce /Ce have been used as redox mediators to facilitate electron-hole separation in metal loaded oxide semiconductor photocatalysts [105-107], Two different photocatalysts, Pt-Ti02 (anatase) and Ti02 (rutile), suspended in an aqueous solution of Nal were employed to produce H2 and O2 under, respectively, the mediation of 1 (electron donor) and IOs (electron acceptor) [105]. The following steps are involved in a one-cell reaction in the presence of UV light. [Pg.392]

Even without deposition of a metal island, such powders often maintain photoactivity. The requirement for effective photoelectrochemical conversion on untreated surfaces is that either the oxidation or reduction half reaction occur readily on the dark material upon application of an appropriate potential, so that one of the photogenerated charge carries can be efficiently scavenged. Thus, for some photoinduced redox reactions, metallization of the semiconductor photocatalyst will be essential, whereas for others platinization will have nearly no effect. [Pg.74]

Thin-lilm photoelectrodes are needed in photoelectrocatalytic systems to apply a bias potential, either for the photoelectrode characterization or to facilitate the photocatalytic reactions. However, to be able to present a more comprehensive view on the performance of different materials, our subsequent discussions will focus on particulate semiconductor photocatalysts since the latter have been much more extensively investigated. Their electronic band structure (i.e., both the bandgap energy and the positions of CB and VB) is the key factor to determine whether or not a semiconductor material is suitable for a specific photocatalytic reaction, as will be demonstrated by reviewing a number of selected metal oxides and cou-pled/composite materials based on various semiconductors. [Pg.387]

When deployed on-line, the semiconductor photocatalyst may be required to photoreduce more than one type of actinide metal ion simultaneously. Figure 9 shows the effect of illuminating U(VI) with light of wavelength 350 nm in the presence of colloidal SnCh, nitric acid (pH 0) and ethanol as an electron scavenger for the semiconductor photocatalyst and Ce(IV) as a non-radioactive, thermodynamic analogue for Pu(IV). Comparison of the data in Fig. 9 with the data recorded under similar conditions as shown in Fig. 7 indicates that the presence of Ce(IV) has no effect on the rate of photocatalysed reduction of U(VI) to U(IV). Furthermore, spectroscopic analysis indicates that virtually all of the Ce(IV) has been reduced to Ce(III) over the same timescale, suggesting that the simultaneous photocatalysed reduction of two or more different types of (actinide) metal ion can be accomplished with no loss of yield for either reaction. [Pg.476]

Topics which have formed the subjects of reviews this year include excited state chemistry within zeolites, photoredox reactions in organic synthesis, selectivity control in one-electron reduction, the photochemistry of fullerenes, photochemical P-450 oxygenation of cyclohexene with water sensitized by dihydroxy-coordinated (tetraphenylporphyrinato)antimony(V) hexafluorophosphate, bio-mimetic radical polycyclisations of isoprenoid polyalkenes initiated by photo-induced electron transfer, photoinduced electron transfer involving C o/CjoJ comparisons between the photoinduced electron transfer reactions of 50 and aromatic carbonyl compounds, recent advances in the chemistry of pyrrolidino-fullerenes, ° photoinduced electron transfer in donor-linked fullerenes," supra-molecular model systems,and within dendrimer architecture,photoinduced electron transfer reactions of homoquinones, amines, and azo compounds, photoinduced reactions of five-membered monoheterocyclic compounds of the indigo group, photochemical and polymerisation reactions in solid Qo, photo- and redox-active [2]rotaxanes and [2]catenanes, ° reactions of sulfides and sulfenic acid derivatives with 02( Ag), photoprocesses of sulfoxides and related compounds, semiconductor photocatalysts,chemical fixation and photoreduction of carbon dioxide by metal phthalocyanines, and multiporphyrins as photosynthetic models. [Pg.188]

SECM has been applied to the investigation of various technologically important materials and interfaces, for example, metallic corrosion [91-96], fuel cell electrocatalysts [97], semiconductor photocatalysts [12, 60-63, 98], conducting polymers [49, 50, 85, 86, 99-103], liquid-liquid and liquid-gas interfaces [29, 30, 68]. The SECM may be used to image the substrate topography and/or reactivity, or with the tip at a fixed location, to study the local kinetics of the interfacial reactions of interest. [Pg.460]

The efficiency of semiconductor PCs in some reactions (such as dehydrogenation of organics, splitting of HjO and H2S, etc.) can be enhanced by depositing tiny islands of additional catalysts, which facilitate certain reactions stages that may not require illumination. For example, islands of Pt metal are deposited on the surface of the composite photocatalyst in Fig.6 with the aim to facilitate the step of H2 formation. [Pg.44]

As seen in reaction (6.5.3) photogenerated holes are consumed, making electron-hole separation more effective as needed for efficient water splitting. The evolution of CO2 and O2 from reaction (6.5.6) can promote desorption of oxygen from the photocatalyst surface, inhibiting the formation of H2O through the backward reaction of H2 and O2. The desorbed CO2 dissolves in aqueous suspension, and is then converted to HCOs to complete a cycle. The mechanism is still not fully understood, with the addition of the same amount of different carbonates, see Table 6.2, showing very different results [99]. Moreover, the amount of metal deposited in the host semiconductor is also a critical factor that determines the catalytic efficiency, see Fig. 6.7. [Pg.390]

Metals, such as platinum, are usually introduced to improve the electron-hole separation efficiency. In order to analyze the energy structure of the metal-loaded particulate semiconductor, we solved the two-dimensional Poisson-Boltzmann equation.3) When the metal is deposited to the semiconductor by, for example, evaporation, a Schottky barrier is usually formed.45 For the Schottky type contact, the barrier height increases with an increase of the work function of the metal,4 which should decrease the photocatalytic activity. However, higher activity was actually observed for the metal with a higher work function.55 This results from the fact that ohmic contact with deposited metal particles is established in photocatalysts when the deposited semiconductor is treated by heat65 or metal is deposited by the photocatalytic reaction.75 Therefore, in the numerical computation we assumed ohmic contact at the energy level junction of the metal and semiconductor. [Pg.224]


See other pages where Metal-semiconductor photocatalysts reactions is mentioned: [Pg.31]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.1468]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.362]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.31 , Pg.32 , Pg.33 , Pg.34 , Pg.35 , Pg.36 , Pg.37 , Pg.38 ]




SEARCH



Metal-semiconductor photocatalysts

Photocatalyst

Photocatalysts

Semiconductor metals

Semiconductor photocatalysts

Semiconductor reactions

Semiconductors metallicity

© 2024 chempedia.info