Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Polymer films, metal containing

The activation of nonconducting materials by the deposition of metal-containing polymer films could improve the autocatalytic metallization process by eliminating the aqueous etching and sensitizing steps. In addition, substrates that are hard to etch and activate by the aqueous process could be plated by this technique. [Pg.454]

The synthesis of the metal containing polymer films involves a capacitively coupled diode reactor configuration in which one electrode is grounded, (the anode). [Pg.195]

In the temperature interval of —70 to 0°C and in the low-frequency range, an unexpected dielectric relaxation process for polymers is detected. This process is observed clearly in the sample PPX with metal Cu nanoparticles. In sample PPX + Zn only traces of this process can be observed, and in the PPX + PbS as well as in pure PPX matrix the process completely vanishes. The amplitude of this process essentially decreases, when the frequency increases, and the maximum of dielectric losses have almost no temperature dependence [104]. This is a typical dielectric response for percolation behavior [105]. This process may relate to electron transfer between the metal nanoparticles through the polymer matrix. Data on electrical conductivity of metal containing PPX films (see above) show that at metal concentrations higher than 5 vol.% there is an essential probability for electron transfer from one particle to another and thus such particles become involved in the percolation process. The minor appearance of this peak in PPX + Zn can be explained by oxidation of Zn nanoparticles. [Pg.563]

By the process described above, a plasma film could be obtained that had high enough electrical conductivity to allow direct electrodeposition of copper. The bulk resistivity of film measured by a four-point probe was 2.6 x 10 " ohm-cm for the copper-containing polymer film when deposition was stopped after 18 min at HOW. This value is critical if a uniform electrolytic deposit is to be obtained. For safety, deposition was carried out until a total film thickness of 150nm was obtained, giving a nearly pure metallic layer thick enough to allow subsequent electroplating. [Pg.455]

The technology of plasma formation of metal-containing polymers in the form of thin films dates from 1963, when Bradley and Hammes(15) prepared specimens from some forty different materials, and studied their electrical conductivities. Included in the study were organic compounds of iron, tin, titanium, mercury, selenium, and arsenic. The presence of a metal or transition element in the polymer did not lead to special electrical properties compared to the purely organic polymers studied. [Pg.556]

Electrochemical reduction of ruthenium and osmium complexes containing /ra i-chloride ligands leads to metal-containing polymers in which metal-metal bonds make up the entire polymer backbone. Hence, reduction of [M (tran5-Cl2) (bipy)(CO)2l (M=Ru, Os) (77) to M complexes generated a polymeric film (78) after loss of the chloride ligands (Scheme 23). Both the ruthenium- and osmium-based coordination polymers were selective for the reduction of carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide and formate. [Pg.162]

Copolymers wet and adhere well to nonporous surfaces, such as plastics and metals. They form soft, flexible films, in contrast to the tough, horny films formed by homopolymers, and are more water-resistant. As the ratio of comonomer to vinyl acetate increases, the variety of plastics to which the copolymer adheres also increases. Comonomers containing functional groups often adhere to specific surfaces for example, carboxyl containing polymers adhere well to metals. [Pg.469]

If a paint film is to prevent this reaction, it must be impervious to electrons, otherwise the cathodic reaction is merely transferred from the surface of the metal to the surface of the film. Organic polymer films do not contain free electrons, except in the special case of pigmentation with metallic pigments consequently it will be assumed that the conductivity of paint films is entirely ionic. In addition, the films must be impervious to either water or oxygen, so that they prevent either from reaching the surface of the metal. [Pg.591]

In order to make the potential of iron more negative, the iron must receive a continuous supply of electrons. As has already been pointed out, polymer films do not contain free electrons there remains the possibility of obtaining these from a pigment. The only pigments which contain free electrons are metallic ones, and such pigments will protect iron cathodically if the following conditions are fulfilled ... [Pg.594]

On the other hand, Doblhofer218 has pointed out that since conducting polymer films are solvated and contain mobile ions, the potential drop occurs primarily at the metal/polymer interface. As with a redox polymer, electrons move across the film because of concentration gradients of oxidized and reduced sites, and redox processes involving solution species occur as bimolecular reactions with polymer redox sites at the polymer/solution interface. This model was found to be consistent with data for the reduction and oxidation of a variety of species at poly(7V-methylpyrrole). This polymer has a relatively low maximum conductivity (10-6 - 10 5 S cm"1) and was only partially oxidized in the mediation experiments, which may explain why it behaved more like a redox polymer than a typical conducting polymer. [Pg.587]

The time necessary for removing one monolayer during a SIMS experiment depends not only on the sputter yield, but also on the type of sample under study. We will make an estimate for two extremes. First, the surface of a metal contains about 1015 atoms/cm2. If we use an ion beam with a current density of 1 nA/cm2, then we need some 150 000 s - about 40 h - to remove one monolayer if the sputter yield is 1, and 4 h if the sputter rate is 10. However, if we are working with polymers we need significantly lower ion doses to remove a monolayer. It is believed [4] that one impact of a primary ion affects an area of about 10 nm2, which is equivalent to a circle of about 3.5 nm diameter. Hence if the sample consists, for example, of a monolayer film of polymer material, a dose of 10n ions/cm2 could in principle be sufficient to remove or alter all material on the surface. With a current density of 1 nA this takes about 1500 s or 25 min only. For adsorbates such as CO adsorbed on a metal surface, we estimate that the monolayer lifetime is at least a factor of 10 higher than that for polymer samples. Thus for static SIMS, one needs primary ion current densities on the order of 1 nA/cm2 or less, and one should be able to collect all spectra of one sample within a quarter of an hour. [Pg.103]


See other pages where Polymer films, metal containing is mentioned: [Pg.36]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.548]    [Pg.628]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.623]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.7141]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.597]    [Pg.588]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.780]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.575]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.195 ]




SEARCH



Deposition metal-containing polymer films

Films metallic

Metal films

Metal-containing polymers thin film structures

© 2024 chempedia.info