Mesoporosity limitations

By contrast, in the case of PCH, a much higher yield of Flavan, 15.3%, was obtained. The limitation of the diffusions of the bulk reactant and product (flavan) were in some way overcome by the PCH. Obviously, the formation of mesoporosity in PCH does appreciably alter the accessibility of reactants and this increases its ability of shape selectivity to catalyze the alkylation reaction. 

The resulting mesoporous layers don t usually exhibit extraporosity at a larger scale, but as smaller pores in the oxide walls (Figure 25.24). ° Due to limitations associated with intrinsic mesostructure characteristics, anisotropy resulting from preferential orientations, or boundaries between ordered domains, the tem-plated mesoporosity is usually not directly interconnected. " In such situations, it does directly define the selectivity of the membrane, which depends on the pore size of the oxide walls. However, the resulting hierarchical porosity (templated mesopores and smaller pores of the oxide walls) favors a decrease in layer permeability. The templated mesoporosity can also be used to functionalize the membrane. 

FIGURE 25.23 Evolution of the intensity of the main diffraction peak associated with ordered mesoporosity as a function of the volume fraction of triblock copolymer (P123). The limits of the hexagonal phase at 30°C in the water-P123 binary diagram are reported as vertical lines. (From Bose, F., Ayral, A., Albouy, P.A., Datas, L., and Guizard, C., Chem. Mater., 16, 2208, 2004.)... 

Mesoporous Fe-MFI zeolites have been successfixlly prepared by treatment of isomorphously substituted Fe-silicalite and ion-exchanged Fe-ZSM-5 in alkaline medium. Iron in framework positions directs the silicon extraction towards mesoporosity development, whereas iron in non-framework positions inhibits silicon dissolution and limits mesoporosity development. 

Alkaline treatment of Fe-Z15, its Si/Al ratio of 16 being outside the optimal range for mesopore formation as shown in Fig. 1, leads to a significantly lower Si extraction of 290 mg F as compared to the iron-free system (570 mg f ), while a similar (limited) mesoporosity (50 m g ) has been measured (Table 1). The slight increase of 10 m g" in mesopore surface area must be attributed to the relatively high framework aluminium concentration in Z15, which stabilizes the zeolite framework against desilication and suppresses silicon extraction [18]. Similarly to s-FeS-at, the presence of non-framework iron does not facilitate sihcon dissolution. 

The pore size distribution from the Kelvin equation should be limited to mesopores due to the ambiguity of the meniscus in the microporous region. It is well known that the presence of micropores is essential for the adsorption of small gas molecules on activated carbons. However, when the adsorbate is polymer, dye or vitamin, only mesopores allow the adsorption of such giant molecules and can keep even bacteria. The importance of mesopores has been pointed out not only for the giant molecule adsorption, but also for the performance of new applications such as electric double layer capacitors. Thus, the design and control of mesoporosity is very desirable both for the improvement of performance of activated carbon and for the development of its new application fields [1-3],... 

Note 2 The nomenclature assigned to pore dimensions is one which has been inherited over past decades. In the literature, the use of the term nanoporosity is appearing to distinguish it from other porosities. This is where some confusion now arises. The porosities of concern to adsorption processes are the micro- and mesoporosities, with dimensions of <2.0 nm and between 2.0 and 50 nm respectively that is, both have dimensions of nanometers. The terms micro and meso, as such, are essentially only a name and have no significance beyond that. In recent times, interest has centered on porosities in carbons with dimensions < 1.0 nm and which are responsible for the phenomena of activated diffusion (Chapter 4) and uptake of lithium as for the lithium-ion battery (the so-called nanoporosity). The literature also refers to ultra-mieroporosity, of suggested dimensions <0.7 nm as well as super-microporosity assigned to microporosity with dimensions nearer to the limit of 2.0 run, where three or four... 

Unfortunately, the model has limitations in that it does not follow that microporosity has to lead from mesoporosity. By being drawn in this way, it provides for misconceptions concerning the structure of the molecular space and of the carbon network. It also gives the impression that parts of the carbon possess no porosity, that is, those parts of the model (photograph) which do not contain branches. They fail to meet all of the requirements of Table 3.1. But, the model does indicate the concept of transportation and of intercoimectivity. 

The similarities between the labyrinth of a maze and of porosity in a carbon are quite remarkable although it is necessary to mention some limitations, initially. There are four limitations of importance. First, this maze, of course, is in two dimensions second, the lines of the maze are too orientated relative to an x-y axis. Such parallelism is unlikely to exist within a porous carbon third, this labyrinth is best suited to a microporous carbon, only and not to micro-porous carbon fibers. Fourth, in such a model, rates of diffusion are likely to be too slow and hence there is a need to consider the location of mesoporosity. The inclusion of mesoporos-ity is another matter. Mesoporosity has to promote enhanced adsorption to the interior of the fiber. As a matter of scaling, although the models of Figure 3.28(a-c) provide an impressive number of adsorption locations, it will require about 10 of such models, as shown in Figure 3.28(c), to describe 1 g of carbon. The human mind cannot cope with this necessity. 

Mesoporosity is defined as that porosity which has an entrance dimension >2nm and <50 nm. Such a definition is based around the way that nitrogen is adsorbed into porosity. The filling of the porosity, >2 <50 nm, is called capillary condensation. Adsorption occurs initially on the pore walls with the result that the pore is not only a narrower pore, but also it behaves as a narrower pore with a higher adsorption potential well in the center (Figure 4.2). This process continues with increasing relative pressure within pores of increasing diameter until the 50 nm limit (or thereabouts) is reached when the entrance dimension of the pore (gap between the pore walls) is so large that the porosity behaves as an open surface. 

The experimental data for mesopore assessments are the isotherms at their high relative pressure ranges. With mesoporosity present, the isotherms of activated carbons adopt the Type-IV shape, usually terminating without a plateau, at position S (Figure 4.60). The p/p value of 1.0 provides a limit to amounts that can be adsorbed, in units of mmol g. Conversion to volumes adsorbed (Vp in cm g ) is possible using an estimated molar volume, V , (cm mmol ) of the liquid adsorbate. When different liquids are used. 

As could be derived from the minor changes in the isotherm at P/Po = 0.4 to -1, the limited mesoporosity developed in the samples of alkaline-treated ZSM-5 zeolites from one of high Si02/Al203 molar ratio 200 (PSDs not shown here). 

---