Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Mechanisms diffusion coefficient

In conclusion, 1) Hydrophilic solutes permeate p-HEMA and p-HEMA crosslinked with lower mole % EGDMA via the "pore" mechanism. The diffusion coefficients of the solutes depend on the molecular size and may utilize the "bulk-like" water in the hydrogels. As the water content of hydrogel increases, the solute permeability increases. 2) Hydrophobic solutes permeate p-HEMA and p-HEMA crosslinked with EGDMA via either the "pore" or "partition" mechanisms. Diffusion coefficients are lower than those of hydrophilic solutes however, steroids can permeate even in p-HEMA with 5.25 mole % EGDMA due to the predominant "partition" mechanism for hydrophobic solute permeation in this membrane. Hydrophilic solutes fail to permeate the high crosslinked hydrogels. [Pg.357]

It is known that even condensed films must have surface diffusional mobility Rideal and Tadayon [64] found that stearic acid films transferred from one surface to another by a process that seemed to involve surface diffusion to the occasional points of contact between the solids. Such transfer, of course, is observed in actual friction experiments in that an uncoated rider quickly acquires a layer of boundary lubricant from the surface over which it is passed [46]. However, there is little quantitative information available about actual surface diffusion coefficients. One value that may be relevant is that of Ross and Good [65] for butane on Spheron 6, which, for a monolayer, was about 5 x 10 cm /sec. If the average junction is about 10 cm in size, this would also be about the average distance that a film molecule would have to migrate, and the time required would be about 10 sec. This rate of Junctions passing each other corresponds to a sliding speed of 100 cm/sec so that the usual speeds of 0.01 cm/sec should not be too fast for pressurized film formation. See Ref. 62 for a study of another mechanism for surface mobility, that of evaporative hopping. [Pg.450]

The Turing mechanism requires that the diffusion coefficients of the activator and inlribitor be sufficiently different but the diffusion coefficients of small molecules in solution differ very little. The chemical Turing patterns seen in the CIMA reaction used starch as an indicator for iodine. The starch indicator complexes with iodide which is the activator species in the reaction. As a result, the complexing reaction with the immobilized starch molecules must be accounted for in the mechanism and leads to the possibility of Turing pattern fonnation even if the diffusion coefficients of the activator and inlribitor species are the same 62. [Pg.3069]

If the diffusion coefficient of species A is less tlian tliat of B (D < D ) tlie propagating front will be planar. However, if is sufficiently greater than tire planar front will become unstable to transverse perturbations and chaotic front motion will ensue. To understand tire origin of tire mechanism of tire planar front destabilization consider tire following suppose tire interface is slightly non-planar. We would like to know if tire dynamics will tend to eliminate this non-planarity or accentuate it. LetZ)g The situation is depicted schematically in figure... [Pg.3070]

The friction coefficient determines the strength of the viscous drag felt by atoms as they move through the medium its magnitude is related to the diffusion coefficient, D, through the relation Y= kgT/mD. Because the value of y is related to the rate of decay of velocity correlations in the medium, its numerical value determines the relative importance of the systematic dynamic and stochastic elements of the Langevin equation. At low values of the friction coefficient, the dynamical aspects dominate and Newtonian mechanics is recovered as y —> 0. At high values of y, the random collisions dominate and the motion is diffusion-like. [Pg.94]

Because of the close similarity in shape of the profiles shown in Fig. 16-27 (as well as likely variations in parameters e.g., concentration-dependent surface diffusion coefficient), a contrdling mechanism cannot be rehably determined from transition shape. If rehable correlations are not available and rate parameters cannot be measured in independent experiments, then particle diameters, velocities, and other factors should be varied ana the obsei ved impacl considered in relation to the definitions of the numbers of transfer units. [Pg.1527]

This analysis makes possible the determination of a chemical diffusion coefficient from experimental data having made no use of a model, and which takes no account of tire atomic mechanism of diffusion, and assumes tlrat the same chemical diffusion coefficient applies to each component of the alloy. [Pg.179]

The diffusion coefficient corresponding to the measured values of /ch (D = kn/4nRn, is the reaction diameter, supposed to be equal to 2 A) equals 2.7 x 10 cm s at 4.2K and 1.9K. The self-diffusion in H2 crystals at 11-14 K is thermally activated with = 0.4 kcal/mol [Weinhaus and Meyer 1972]. At T < 11 K self-diffusion in the H2 crystal involves tunneling of a molecule from the lattice node to the vacancy, formation of the latter requiring 0.22 kcal/mol [Silvera 1980], so that the Arrhenius behavior is preserved. Were the mechanism of diffusion of the H atom the same, the diffusion coefficient at 1.9 K would be ten orders smaller than that at 4.2 K, while the measured values coincide. The diffusion coefficient of the D atoms in the D2 crystal is also the same for 1.9 and 4.2 K. It is 4 orders of magnitude smaller (3 x 10 cm /s) than the diffusion coefficient for H in H2 [Lee et al. 1987]. [Pg.112]

There is experimental evidence to suggest that anion and cation diffusion can have different mechanisms [70]. The temperature variation of the diffusion coefficients of 1,1 P and 7 Li in aPEO-LiPF6 shows quite different trends. The 31P diffusion coefficients follow a VTF-type de-... [Pg.509]

In addition, it was concluded that the liquid-phase diffusion coefficient is the major factor influencing the value of the mass-transfer coefficient per unit area. Inasmuch as agitators operate poorly in gas-liquid dispersions, it is impractical to induce turbulence by mechanical means that exceeds gravitational forces. They conclude, therefore, that heat- and mass-transfer coefficients per unit area in gas dispersions are almost completely unaffected by the mechanical power dissipated in the system. Consequently, the total mass-transfer rate in agitated gas-liquid contacting is changed almost entirely in accordance with the interfacial area—a function of the power input. [Pg.307]

The reaction of Si02 with SiC [1229] approximately obeyed the zero-order rate equation with E = 548—405 kJ mole 1 between 1543 and 1703 K. The proposed mechanism involved volatilized SiO and CO and the rate-limiting step was identified as product desorption from the SiC surface. The interaction of U02 + SiC above 1650 K [1230] obeyed the contracting area rate equation [eqn. (7), n = 2] with E = 525 and 350 kJ mole 1 for the evolution of CO and SiO, respectively. Kinetic control is identified as gas phase diffusion from the reaction site but E values were largely determined by equilibrium thermodynamics rather than by diffusion coefficients. [Pg.277]

Chronoamperometry is often used for measuring the diffusion coefficient of electroactive species or the surface area of the working electrode. Analytical applications of chronoamperometry (e.g., in-vivo bioanalysis) rely on pulsing of the potential of the working electrode repetitively at fixed tune intervals. Chronoamperometry can also be applied to the study of mechanisms of electrode processes. Particularly attractive for this task are reversal double-step chronoamperometric experiments (where the second step is used to probe the fate of a species generated in the first step). [Pg.61]

Mechanisms of micellar reactions have been studied by a kinetic study of the state of the proton at the surface of dodecyl sulfate micelles [191]. Surface diffusion constants of Ni(II) on a sodium dodecyl sulfate micelle were studied by electron spin resonance (ESR). The lateral diffusion constant of Ni(II) was found to be three orders of magnitude less than that in ordinary aqueous solutions [192]. Migration and self-diffusion coefficients of divalent counterions in micellar solutions containing monovalent counterions were studied for solutions of Be2+ in lithium dodecyl sulfate and for solutions of Ca2+ in sodium dodecyl sulfate [193]. The structural disposition of the porphyrin complex and the conformation of the surfactant molecules inside the micellar cavity was studied by NMR on aqueous sodium dodecyl sulfate micelles [194]. [Pg.275]

It is appropriate to differentiate between polymerizations occuring at temperatures above and below the glass transition point(Tg) of the polymer being produced. For polymerizations below Tg the diffusion coefficients of even small monomer molecules can fall appreciably and as a consequence even relatively slow reactions involving monomer molecules can become diffusion controlled complicating the mechanism of polymerization even further. For polymerizations above Tg one can reasonably assume that reactions involving small molecules are not diffusion controlled, except perhaps for extremely fast reactions such as those involving termination of small radicals. [Pg.43]

In ultra-thin films, on the other hand, the mechanism of spreading is dominated by surface diffusion so that the diffusion coefficients can be written as... [Pg.229]

The integrated form is x = Kt -i- C, or x = D Vt, where D is the Diffusion Coefficient. Eiquation 4.5.3. is called the Parabolic Law of Diffusion. If the growth of a phase can be fitted to this equation, then it is likely that the primary reaction mechanism involves simple diffusion. [Pg.147]


See other pages where Mechanisms diffusion coefficient is mentioned: [Pg.313]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.3068]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.643]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.2002]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.581]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.569]    [Pg.644]    [Pg.229]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.347 ]




SEARCH



Mechanical coefficient

© 2024 chempedia.info