Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Mechanical property measurement reinforced polymers

All VGCF was graphitized prior to composite consolidation. Composites were molded in steel molds lined with fiberglass reinforced, non-porous Teflon release sheets. The finished composite panels were trimmed of resin flash and weighed to determine the fiber fraction. Thermal conductivity and thermal expansion measurements of the various polymer matrix composites are given in Table 6. Table 7 gives results from mechanical property measurements. [Pg.151]

The effect of polymer-filler interaction on solvent swelling and dynamic mechanical properties of the sol-gel-derived acrylic rubber (ACM)/silica, epoxi-dized natural rubber (ENR)/silica, and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/silica hybrid nanocomposites was described by Bandyopadhyay et al. [27]. Theoretical delineation of the reinforcing mechanism of polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites has been attempted by some authors while studying the micromechanics of the intercalated or exfoliated PNCs [28-31]. Wu et al. [32] verified the modulus reinforcement of rubber/clay nanocomposites using composite theories based on Guth, Halpin-Tsai, and the modified Halpin-Tsai equations. On introduction of a modulus reduction factor (MRF) for the platelet-like fillers, the predicted moduli were found to be closer to the experimental measurements. [Pg.7]

Mechanical Properties. To reveal the reinforcing effect of liquid crystalline polymer microfibrils on the mechanical properties of the films both their dynamic torsional moduli and dynamic tensile moduli have been studied as a function of temperature using a Rheometrics Mechanical Spectrometer (RMS 800) and a Rheometrics Solids Analyzer (RSA II), respectively. For comparison purpose the modulus of neat matrix polymers and, in some cases, the modulus of carbon fiber and Kevelar fiber reinforced composites has also been measured. [Pg.431]

Zimmermann et al. [134] have used cellulose fibrils obtained from sulphite wood pulp to reinforce water soluble polymers such as polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC). The mechanical properties of these nanocomposites were measured by tensile tests showing that the addition of fibrils increase the modulus of elasticity (E) up to three times and the tensile strength up to five times compared to the raw polymer. Zimmermann et al. [135] have determined the E values and the hardness of cellulose/HPC nanocomposites using nanoindentation technique. The results showed that the E values measured by nanoindentation were from two to three times higher than the E values measured by means of tensile tests. Stauss et al. [136] have explained that differences between tensile test and indentation results are due to the fact that they do not test the same material volumes and regions. The large volume used in tensile test includes defects such as pores, cracks and impurities. [Pg.40]

The need for mechanical reinforcement has been the driving force for most of the reported work on polymer/CNT composites. In an attempt to investigate the mechanical properties of electrospun PAN/SWNT nanofibers, Ko et al. (75) have used an atomic force microscope (AFM) to measure the elastic modulus of the electrospun composite nanofibers. The obtained fiber modulus was 140 GPa, a value which is much higher than that of conventional PAN fibers (60 GPa) (75). In a somewhat related but independent study, Mathew et al. (92) also used AFM to measure the mechanical properties of electrospun polybutylene/MWNT terephthalate nanofibers. Elastic deformation of MWNTs in electrospun PEO/MWNT and PVA/MWNT nanofibers was studied by Zhou and co-workers (84), and was found to increase with an increase in the modulus of the polymer matrix. In the same study, a simplified model was also proposed to estimate the elastic modulus ratio of MWNT and polymers. To confirm the validity of their model, these authors compared the model predictions with experimental data obtained from AFM measurements. [Pg.51]

The main reason for the recent popularity of nanotechnology is that the reduction of the dimensions of a material to nanosize leads to new specific properties [82]. It is crucial to understand the intrinsic mechanical properties of CNFs in order to incorporate them into polymer resins to fabricate CNFs-reinforced nanocomposites. Because of the structural complexity of CNFs derived from variations in inner and outer wall thickness, cone angle, orientation of graphite plane, and C-C bonds, determination of their mechanical properties had posted considerable difficulties. To date, direct measurement of tensile properties of CNFs is accessible only with the aid... [Pg.78]


See other pages where Mechanical property measurement reinforced polymers is mentioned: [Pg.273]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.794]    [Pg.588]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.2318]    [Pg.1007]    [Pg.588]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.569]    [Pg.585]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.247]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.12 ]




SEARCH



Mechanical measurement

Mechanical properties reinforcement

Mechanical property measurement polymers

Mechanical reinforcement

Mechanism reinforcing

Polymer measurement

Polymer mechanical

Polymer mechanism

Properties measured

Reinforced polymers

Reinforcement, mechanisms

Reinforcing property

© 2024 chempedia.info