Matter microscopic view

Statistical mechanics provides a bridge between the properties of atoms and molecules (microscopic view) and the thermodynmamic properties of bulk matter (macroscopic view). For example, the thermodynamic properties of ideal gases can be calculated from the atomic masses and vibrational frequencies, bond distances, and the like, of molecules. This is, in general, not possible for biochemical species in aqueous solution because these systems are very complicated from a molecular point of view. Nevertheless, statistical mechanmics does consider thermodynamic systems from a very broad point of view, that is, from the point of view of partition functions. A partition function contains all the thermodynamic information on a system. There is a different partition function... 

The microscopic views in this book are models that are designed to show you the differences in the arrangement of particles in different states of matter. They also show you the differences in size, shape, and makeup of particles of chemicals. But don t take these models too literally. Think of them as cartoons. Atoms are not really different colors. And groups of connected atoms, or molecules, do not look lumpy. The microscopic views are also limited in that they often show only a single layer of particles whereas the particles are really arranged in three dimensions. Finally, the models cannot show you that particles are in constant motion. 

The microscopic view of matter forms the basis (ijr O for understanding why elements and compounds - - 4 react in the ways they do and why they exhibit... 

When microscopists began to look at the tissues of living forms they already had in their minds a view of matter as an aggregate of more or less uniform microscopic components. It is therefore understandable that when they saw everywhere agglomerations of more or less spherical halations, they concluded that these optical illusions were the fundamental subunits of animate matter, and when they actually saw cells they had no idea what they were (Harris, 1999, p. 39-... 

You can view many things in chemistry on both the macroscopic level (the level that we can directly observe) and the microscopic level (the level of atoms and molecules. Many times, observations at the macroscopic level can influence the theories and models at the microscopic level. Theories and models at the microscopic level can suggest possible experiments at the macroscopic level. We express the properties of matter in both of these ways. 

However, if an LC substance is heated, it will show more than one melting point. Thus, liquid crystals are substances that exhibit a phase of matter that has properties between those of a conventional liquid and a solid crystal. For instance, an LC may flow like a liquid but have the molecules in the liquid arranged and/or oriented in a crystal-like way. There are many different types of LC phases that can be distinguished based on their different optical properties (such as birefringence). When viewed under a microscope using a polarized light source, different liquid crystal phases will appear to have a distinct texture. Each patch in the texture corresponds to a domain where the LC molecules are oriented in a different direction. Within a domain, however, the molecules are well ordered. Liquid crystal materials may not always be in an LC phase (just as water is not always in the liquid phase it may also be found in the solid or gas phase). 

Common liquids are optically isotropic, and the solids that physicists seem to like most are cubic and therefore isotropic. As a consequence, treatments of optical properties, particularly from a microscopic point of view, usually favor isotropic matter. Among the host of naturally occurring sohds, however, most are not isotropic. This somewhat complicates both theory and experiment for example, measurements of optical constants must be made with oriented crystals and polarized light. But because of the prevalence of optically anisotropic solids, we are compelled to extend the classical models to embrace this added complexity. 

FIGURE 1-1 Some characteristics of living matter, (a) Microscopic complexity and organization are apparent in this colorized thin section of vertebrate muscle tissue, viewed with the electron microscope. 

Several workers undertook this task. The most notable of these was Perrin. Perrin s special success was due to his technique for preparing particles to suspend that were of uniform and known size. The uniformity was achieved by fractional centrifuging, and the size was established by noting that they could be coagulated into chains whose length could be measured and whose links could be counted. The microscopic observation of these uniform particles enabled Perrin and his students to verify the Einstein results and to make four independent measurements of Avogadro s number. See Fig. 1. These results not only established an understanding of Brownian movement, but also they silenced the last critics of the atomic view of matter. 

The primary difference between optical and electron microscopy is that the latter uses an electron beam as the probe. Since 10- to 500-keV electron beams have much lower wavelengths than light, the resolution is greater. At the same time, the electron beam requires completely different instrumentation (source, collimator, detector, magnification control, etc.). Moreover, electrons are very readily absorbed by matter. Therefore, the entire path of the beam, from source to specimen to detector, has to be in vacuum. From the sample preparation point of view, this is of major significance. For specimens that may change in vacuum, biological tissues, for instance, this can be a major concern, and newly developed accessories such as environmental cells [8] need to be added to the microscope. 

In the formulation of the microscopic balance equations, the molecular nature of matter is ignored and the medium is viewed as a continuum. Specifically, the assumption is made that the mathematical points over which the balance field-equations hold are big enough to be characterized by property values that have been averaged over a large number of molecules, so that from point to point there are no discontinuities. Furthermore, local equilibrium is assumed. That is, although transport processes may be fast and irreversible (dissipative), from the thermodynamics point of view, the assumption is made that, locally, the molecules establish equilibrium very quickly. 

In addition, the Web can offer users animated representations of chemical phenomena and animations at the molecular and particulate levels. Animated representations can show molecular motion and connections among macroscopic, microscopic, and symbolic worlds. On a website, molecular-level views of motion can be shown as appropriate for the respective phases of matter. On paper, it is not possible to show such motion in progress. 

The approach to be used here is, to be sure, well known in parts of theoretical physics, but is novel as far as chemistry is concerned. It is based on the view that macroscopic matter is to be described by a suitably generalized formulation of quantum mechanics, namely Quantum Field Theory the traditional postulate that matter is made up or composed of microscopic elementary constituents (in the classical building-block sense) is given up, and instead the fundamental postulate of the quantum theory of matter is, to paraphrase Gertrude Stein, Matter is Matter is Matter. Then if our interest is chemistry we have of course to confront the obvious question as to how we may construct the particles we call atoms and molecules i.e. we must establish how the notions of atom and molecule emerge from quantum theory construed in a general and modem way as the theory of matter. This is the subject matter of the next section of the review... 

The great philosophers of antiquity discussed quite a number of world views, such as the atomic theory, determinism and indeterminism, relativity and evolution, and yet none of them conceived the cell theory, which makes us wonder why. The fact that they did not have the microscope does not seem to be decisive from a conceptual point of view. Even atoms cannot be seen, and yet the atomic theory was explicitely formulated. The problem is therefore the following Why could ancient people think about atoms but not about cells The idea that matter can be divided into particles is suggested by many facts of daily life a house is made of bricks, a desert is made of grains of sand, drops of rain can be turned into a river, and so on. Why not add that organisms are made of micro-organisms ... 

---