Matrix element between projected functions

In the special case where the spin-orbitals are orthonormal and the trial functions are Slater determinants the expressions for the projective reduction coefficients are both simple and limited, given by Slaters rules to be discussed in detail in later chapters in this work. With such a choice there are Hamiltonian matrix elements between functions that differ from each other only in two or fewer orbitals and Mu = 6u- The expressions for these coefficients when the orbitals are not orthogonal involve the overlap integrals S, j between all the orbitals in the functions and there is no limitation on orbital differences between the functions and Mu is not the unit matrix. Every electronic permutation must be considered in their evaluation. For non-orthogonal orbitals it is thus much more difficult to consider systems with more than a few electrons and, because atomic orbitals on different centers are not orthogonal, this difficulty has hindered the development of VB theory in a quantitative manner until very recently. An account of modern VB developments forms a later part of this handbook. Usually LCAO MOs are developed so as to be orthogonal so that given... 

Here, Flffl are matrix elements of a zeroth-order Hamiltonian, which is chosen as a one-electron operator in the spirit of MP2. is an overlap matrix The excited CFs are not in general orthogonal to each other. Finally, Vf)(i represents the interaction between the excited function and the CAS reference function. The difference between Eq. [2] and ordinary MP2 is the more complicated structure of the matrix elements of the zeroth-order Hamiltonian in MP2 it is a simple sum of orbital energies. Here H is a complex expression involving matrix elements of a generalized Fock operator F combined with up to fourth-order density matrices of the CAS wave function. Additional details are given in the original papers by Andersson and coworkers.17 18 We here mention only the basic principles. The zeroth-order Hamiltonian is written as a sum of projections of F onto the reference function 0)... 

Figure 12.3 shows a schematic illustration of the resulting electron density of states projected onto the adatom in the Newns-Anderson model [17, 18] for two different cases. In this model, the interaction strength between the adatom wave function of one specific electronic level and the metal states is often denoted the hopping matrix element. When the hopping matrix element is much smaller than the bandwidth of the metal states, in this case the i-electrons, the interaction leads... 

For projectile-nucleus scattering we will only be interested in matrix elements of T between initial and final projectile-nucleus wave functions, representing physical states of the system. The symmetry properties of (S,- u,) [Fe 71] result in intermediate states in the second term of eq. (2.5) which span only the physical, antisymmetric states of the nucleus and the physical states of the projectile. Likewise, from eq. (2.4), only the projections of If and (f) onto physical states of the system need be retained. Thus we consider and (f) from here on to be expanded in terms of all antisymmetric states of the target and all physical states of the projectile. Note that these states do not form complete sets [Ke 59]. Antisymmetrization between the projectile and target nucleon labels (in the case of nucleon projectiles) is, for the moment, neglected. TTie total wave function is therefore expanded according to... 

Let us now suppose the state s) to be represented by the approximate Hamiltonian Ho of Equation Al. If, for example, the state s) and another state i>) of the manifold (Al) between the transitions are isolated from the remaining states of Ho, the problem is relatively simple. However, if the states are not isolated, the calculation of the transition probability is not simple. To reduce the complexity and to make clear the states of the system to be included in the calculation of the matrix elements of the Green s function, we use the Feshbach projection operator formalism. In this formalism, a projection operator associated with a model function or a set of states, the so-called dose coupled states, is introduced... 

---