Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Matrix activity, removal

Apply epi-illumination with the 488/568 filter cube to simultaneously observe GFP expressing cells with dark areas on the AlexaFluor 568 subtraction indicating an active formation of invadopodia (areas where fluorescent matrix is removed). [Pg.220]

Matrix components generally do not interfere with trace element determination, e.g., C, H, O, and N contained in organic materials do not affect the detection of trace metals in NAA. On the other hand, minor or trace elements that are easily activated, e.g., Na, may significantly influence the detection limits for trace elements. Matrix activities are frequently eliminated by selective chemical removal, thus increasing the sensitivity for many trace elements. [Pg.1585]

After decay of the matrix activity, the sample is chemically etched and dissolved in nitric acid. Water and 20 mg of phosphorus carrier (NH )2HP0 are added and the solution is electrolyzed under a potential difference of 2.5 V between 2 platinum electrodes, the copper being deposited on the cathode. The solution is evaporated until nearly dry, taken up in 12 M hydrochloric acid and passed through a column with Dowex X-1 anion exchanger that retains impurities such as antimony, iron, cobalt and zinc as chloride complexes. The column is eluted with 15 ml of 12 M hydrochloric acid and the acid is removed by evaporation. Afterwards, phosphorus is precipitated as ammonium molybdophosphate from nitric acid medium and precipitated again as ammonium magnesiumphosphate from ammonia solution. [Pg.379]

Both silicon and aluminium are added to zinc to control the adverse effects of iron. The former forms a ferro-silicon dross (which may be removed during casting). Aluminium forms an intermetallic compound which is less active as a cathode than FeZn,] . Similarly in aluminium and magnesium alloys, manganese is added to control the iron . Thus in aluminium alloys for example, the cathodic activity of, FeAl, is avoided by transformation of FeAlj to (Fe, Mn)Al/. This material is believed to have a corrosion potential close to that of the matrix and is, therefore, unable to produce significant cathodic activity . [Pg.140]

Figure 48-12. Schematic illustration of some aspects of the role of the osteoclast in bone resorption. Lysosomal enzymes and hydrogen ions are released into the confined microenvironment created by the attachment between bone matrix and the peripheral clear zone of the osteoclast. The acidification of this confined space facilitates the dissolution of calcium phosphate from bone and is the optimal pH for the activity of lysosomal hydrolases. Bone matrix is thus removed, and the products of bone resorption are taken up into the cytoplasm of the osteoclast, probably digested further, and transferred into capillaries. The chemical equation shown in the figure refers to the action of carbonic anhydrase II, described in the text. (Reproduced, with permission, from Jun-queira LC, Carneiro J BasicHistology. Text Atlas, 10th ed. McGraw-Hill, 2003.)... Figure 48-12. Schematic illustration of some aspects of the role of the osteoclast in bone resorption. Lysosomal enzymes and hydrogen ions are released into the confined microenvironment created by the attachment between bone matrix and the peripheral clear zone of the osteoclast. The acidification of this confined space facilitates the dissolution of calcium phosphate from bone and is the optimal pH for the activity of lysosomal hydrolases. Bone matrix is thus removed, and the products of bone resorption are taken up into the cytoplasm of the osteoclast, probably digested further, and transferred into capillaries. The chemical equation shown in the figure refers to the action of carbonic anhydrase II, described in the text. (Reproduced, with permission, from Jun-queira LC, Carneiro J BasicHistology. Text Atlas, 10th ed. McGraw-Hill, 2003.)...
The first position can be safely excluded since a high temperature calcination, causing the removal of Fe atoms from the lattice, remarkably increases the a>site concentration [27]. Besides, a-sites can be prepared via the impregnation of a ready zeolite matrix [28], when the probability for Fe atoms to incorporate into the lattice is very low. a-Sites do not occupy also the 3rd type position deactivation of the outer zeolite surface by its covering with an inert Si02 layer affects neither catalytic activity no a-site concentration [29]. Thus, we may deduce that the active iron occupies the second type position in ZSM-S matrix and is either isolated Fe ions or small complexes inside the micropore zeolite space. [Pg.500]

The use of polymers for biomedical applications has been widely accepted since the 1960 s (7), and specifically for controlled release applications since the 1970 s (2). The primary goal of this research was to create a controlled release matrix from polymers with pre-existing Food and Drug Administration (FDA) histories, which would be capable of releasing insoluble active agents, and upon exhaustion of the device, leave a stable, inert, removable skeleton. The application of such a matrix would be as an intracervical device which would prevent both conception and ascending infection. [Pg.181]

Biological activity can be used in two ways for the bioremediation of metal-contaminated soils to immobilize the contaminants in situ or to remove them permanently from the soil matrix, depending on the properties of the reduced elements. Chromium and uranium are typical candidates for in situ immobilization processes. The bioreduction of Cr(VI) and Ur(VI) transforms highly soluble ions such as CrO and UO + to insoluble solid compounds, such as Cr(OH)3 and U02. The selenate anions SeO are also reduced to insoluble elemental selenium Se°. Bioprecipitation of heavy metals, such as Pb, Cd, and Zn, in the form of sulfides, is another in situ immobilization option that exploits the metabolic activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria without altering the valence state of metals. The removal of contaminants from the soil matrix is the most appropriate remediation strategy when bioreduction results in species that are more soluble compared to the initial oxidized element. This is the case for As(V) and Pu(IV), which are transformed to the more soluble As(III) and Pu(III) forms. This treatment option presupposes an installation for the efficient recovery and treatment of the aqueous phase containing the solubilized contaminants. [Pg.537]


See other pages where Matrix activity, removal is mentioned: [Pg.389]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.1673]    [Pg.1107]    [Pg.1291]    [Pg.2909]    [Pg.1933]    [Pg.1587]    [Pg.1926]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.8649]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.1219]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.1342]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.586]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.2230]    [Pg.1020]    [Pg.1182]    [Pg.1183]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.627]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.1587 ]




SEARCH



Matrix active

© 2024 chempedia.info