Material strength determination

The material strength determined is the minimum required, not the average or maximum, which is what is normally provided on manufactures published data sheets. 

High temperature strength of refractory materials is determined on rectangular prisms 25 x 25 x 150 mm cut from the product being tested. The specimens are placed ia a furnace, heated to a desired temperature, and the modulus of mpture is determined. A detailed description is given ia ASTM C583. 

Material strength is but one factor ia determining maximum load that can be carried by a beating material. Load capacity is equally related to design details, lubrication, and general appHcation experience. 

Describe briefly how the tensile strength of ceramic materials is determined by their microstructures. How may the tensile strength of ceramics be improved ... 

Finally, it is worth investigating how deterministic values of material strength are calculated as commonly found in engineering data books. Equation 4.14 states that the minimum material strength, as used in deterministic calculations, equals the mean value determined from test, minus three standard deviations, calculated for the Normal distribution (Cable and Virene, 1967) ... 

The calculated loading stress, L, on a component is not only a function of applied load, but also the stress analysis technique used to find the stress, the geometry, and the failure theory used (Ullman, 1992). Using the variance equation, the parameters for the dimensional variation estimates and the applied load distribution, a statistical failure theory can then be formulated to determine the stress distribution, f L). This is then used in the SSI analysis to determine the probability of failure together with material strength distribution f S). 

The stress, L, determined using the Modified Mohr method effeetively aeeounts for all the applied stresses and allows a direet eomparison to a materials strength property to be made (Norton, 1996), as was established for the Distortion Energy Theory for duetile materials. The set of expressions to determine the effeetive or maximum stress are shown below and involve all three prineipal stresses (Dowling, 1993) ... 

Usually, crystallization of flexible-chain polymers from undeformed solutions and melts involves chain folding. Spherulite structures without a preferred orientation are generally formed. The structure of the sample as a whole is isotropic it is a system with a large number of folded-chain crystals distributed in an amorphous matrix and connected by a small number of tie chains (and an even smaller number of strained chains called loaded chains). In this case, the mechanical properties of polymer materials are determined by the small number of these ties and, hence, the tensile strength and elastic moduli of these polymers are not high. 

The failure of a simple structural element under unidirectional stress (tensile or compressive) is easy to relate to the tensile strength of the material, as determined in a standard tensile test, but for components subjected to combined stresses (normal and shear stress) the position is not so simple, and several theories of failure have been proposed. The three theories most commonly used are described below ... 

Figure 5.56 Design chart of modulus versus strength (see inset for type of strength determination). Reprinted, by permission, from M. F. Ashby, Materials Selection in Mechanical Design, 2nd ed., p. 42. Copyright 1999 by Michael F. Ashby.

G(< )t) is also a derived function and is given by Figure 9. /c(ct1), the unconfined yield strength of the material, is determined by the flow function (FF) at the actual consolidating pressure al. The consolidation pressure al is a function of the head or height of powder above the outlet of the bin, as given by Janssen s equation ... 

Electromagnetic interference (EMI) testing has become more prevalent for materials that either emit or are affected by EMI. Shielding efficiency (SE) of materials is determined by measuring electric field strength between a transmitter and receiver with or without the presence of the material under test. Several researchers have suggested a correlation between volume resistivity and SE values (300,301). 

This equilibrium expression links material properties to surface state. Strength will therefore reflect to some extent the microstructural impact on F (also likely on E), but to a much greater extent it is a reflection of the influence of a wide range of mechanical, thermal and chemical operations on cf. Most ceramic surfaces have various surface flaws running up to 10 [Am deep. Even in carefully prepared samples, the largest of them determines the material strength. 

An important specification for gelatin is bloom strength, a quality of the raw material that determines whether or not a capsule can be formed and sealed. As with active ingredient purity, we will want to know this value for each lot of gelatin used in the validation study. 

A bloom strength determination is part of the acceptance criteria for each receipt of gelatin raw material. The bloom gelometer numbers range from 125 to 195 for the 12 lots, with a mean of 147. This number was compared to gelatin ribbon thickness and die rotation speed during encapsulation to ascertain whether lot-to-lot differences had to be compensated for. No relationship was found. 

In tensile strength determinations, the material has to completely break through the cross-section, whereas the tear strength test indicates the resistance to the propagation of a defect, such as a nick, in the polyurethane. The way that elastomers tear under different conditions has led to a number of different tests. 

---