Mass transport charge transfer process

The observed current through the external circuit is determined by the kinetics of the slowest of the various individual steps that take place in each electrode processes mass transport, charge transfer, chemical transformations, etc. 

Electrolytic metal deposition ( electroplating ) is an empirical art widely in use to cover corrosion-sensitive surfaces with a thin protecting metal layer, e.g. of tin, nickel, zinc, etc. The complete plating process comprises several partial processes such as mass transport, charge transfer, adsorption of adatoms, surface diffusion of adatoms, and finally nucleation and crystal growth. 

The information required to predict electrochemical reaction rates (i.e., experimentally determined by Evans diagrams, electrochemical impedance, etc.) depends upon whether the reaction is controlled by the rate of charge transfer or by mass transport. Charge transfer controlled processes are usually not affected by solution velocity or agitation. On the other hand, mass transport controlled processes are strongly influenced by the solution velocity and agitation. The influence of fluid velocity on corrosion rates and/or the rates of electrochemical reactions is complex. To understand these effects requires an understanding of mixed potential theory in combination with hydrodynamic concepts. 

Many of the electrochemical techniques described in this book fulfill all of these criteria. By using an external potential to drive a charge transfer process (electron or ion transfer), mass transport (typically by diffusion) is well-defined and calculable, and the current provides a direct measurement of the interfacial reaction rate [8]. However, there is a whole class of spontaneous reactions, which do not involve net interfacial charge transfer, where these criteria are more difficult to implement. For this type of process, hydro-dynamic techniques become important, where mass transport is controlled by convection as well as diffusion. 

Study of the charge-transfer processes (step 3 above), free of the effects of mass transport, is possible by the use of transient techniques. In the transient techniques the interface at equilibrium is changed from an equilibrium state to a steady state characterized by a new potential difference A(/>. Analysis of the time dependence of this transition is the basis of transient electrochemical techniques. We will discuss galvanostatic and potentiostatic transient techniques for other techniques [e.g., alternating current (ac)], the reader is referred to Refs. 50 to 55. 

The analysis of the kinetics of the charge transfer is presented in Sect. 1.7 for the Butler-Volmer and Marcus-Hush formalisms, and in the latter, the extension to the Marcus-Hush-Chidsey model and a discussion on the adiabatic character of the charge transfer process are also included. The presence of mass transport and its influence on the current-potential response are discussed in Sect. 1.8. 

For an electrode reaction to be considered reversible, it is necessary to compare the rate of the charge transfer process and the rate of the mass transport of electroactive species. When the mass transport rate is slower than the charge transfer one, the electrode reaction is controlled by the transport rate and can be considered as electrochemically reversible in that the surface concentration fulfills the Nemst equation when a given potential is applied to the electrode. In Electrochemistry, knowledge of the behavior of reversible electrode processes is very important, since these can be used as a benchmark for more complex systems (see Chap. 5 in [1] and Sect. 1.8.4 for a detailed discussion). 

In this section, a non-reversible electrode reaction will be addressed. An exact definition of a slow charge transfer process is not possible because the charge transfer reaction can be reversible, quasi-reversible, or irreversible depending on the duration of the experiment and the mass transport rate. So, an electrode reaction can be slow or non-reversible when the mass transport rate has a value such that the measured current is lower than that corresponding to a reversible process because the rate of depletion of the surface species at the electrode surface is less than the diffusion rate at which it reaches the surface. Under these conditions, the potential values that reduce the O species and oxidize the R species become more negative and more positive, respectively, than those predicted by Nemst equation. 

From the voltammograms of Fig. 5.12, the evolution of the response from a reversible behavior for values of K hme > 10 to a totally irreversible one (for Kplane < 0.05) can be observed. The limits of the different reversibility zones of the charge transfer process depend on the electrochemical technique considered. For Normal or Single Pulse Voltammetry, this question was analyzed in Sect. 3.2.1.4, and the relation between the heterogeneous rate constant and the mass transport coefficient, m°, defined as the ratio between the surface flux and the difference of bulk and surface concentrations evaluated at the formal potential of the charge transfer process was considered [36, 37]. The expression of m° depends on the electrochemical technique considered (see for example Sect. 1.8.4). For CV or SCV it takes the form... 

The effects of the catalytic reaction on the CV curve are related to the value of dimensionless parameter A in whose expressions appear variables related to the chemical reaction and also to the geometry of the diffusion field. For small values of A, the surface concentration of species C is scarcely affected by the catalysis for any value of the electrode radius, such that r)7,> —> c c and the current becomes identical to that corresponding to a pseudo-first-order catalytic mechanism (see Eq. (6.203)). In contrast, for high values of A and f —> 1 (cathodic limit), the rate-determining step of the process is the mass transport. In this case, the catalytic limiting current coincides with that obtained for a simple charge transfer process. 

In electrochemistry, transport processes are essential, since mass and charge transfer accompany almost all electrochemical processes. 

The role of the source (O) in a PEVD system is to provide a constant supply of the solid-state transported reactant (A) during a PEVD process. Theoretically, it can be either a solid, liquid or vapor phase, as long as it can supply the ionic reactant (A ) or (A ) to the solid electrolyte (E) and the electronic reactant (e) or (h) to the counter electrode (C) via a source side electrochemical reaction. Therefore, the source must be in intimate contact with both solid electrolyte (E) and counter electrode (C) for mass and charge transfer between the source and solid electrochemical cell at location I of Figure 3. Practically, it is preferable to fix the chemical potential at the source. Any gas or solid mixture which does not react with the cell components and establishes a constant chenfical potential of (A) is a suitable source. For instance, elemental (A) provides (A +) or (A ) according to the following reaction... 

In the following, the floating chemical potential of (A) at (II) is solved under the assumption that the equilibria of mass and charge transport across the interfaces at (II) are rapidly reached during the mass and charge transfer in a PEVD process. In addition, some further assumptions are needed for steady-state conditions during a PEVD process ... 

Mass transport limitation is more often encountered in electrode kinetics than in any other field of chemical kinetics because the activation-controlled charge-transfer rate can be accelerated (by applying a suitable potential) to the point that it is much faster than the consecutive step of mass transport, and therefore no longer controls the observed current. From the laboratory research point of view, mass transport is an added complication to be either avoided or corrected for quantitatively, in order to obtain the true kinetic parameters for the charge-transfer process. 

An electrochemical reaction involves processes such as mass transport, charge separation, charge transfer, electronic and ionic resistances, and so on. These processes often have different time constants and they proceed on different time scales. The impact of these processes on the voltage and current measured in a direct current (DC) experiment is combined and convoluted. 

Figure 11.13 illustrates a basic equivalent circuit to represent a general electrochemical reaction. Rs represents the electric resistance, which consists of the ionic, electronic, and contact resistances. Since the electronic resistance is typically much lower than the ionic resistances for a typical fuel cell MEA, the contribution of the electronic resistance to Rs is often negligible. Cj is the double-layer capacitance associated with the electrode-electrolyte interfaees. Since a fuel cell electrode is three-dimensional, the interfaces include not only Arose between Are surfaces of the electrodes and the membrane but also those between the catalysts and the ionomer within the electrodes. Ret is the resistanee associated with the charge transfer process and is called charge transfer resistanee. Z is called the Warburg impedance it deseribes the resistance arising from the mass transport processes. 

The intensity of migration mass transport can be significantly reduced by adding an excess of indifferent electrolyte whose ions are electrically inactive within a wide range of the potentials, that is, they do not participate in the charge transfer process. These ions create the electric field of the opposite direction, which compensates for the aforementioned potential gradient to a great extent. This sim-phfies the theoretical description of the current. 

---