Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Mass transfer coefficient models:

Reactors which generate vortex flows (VFs) are common in both planktonic cellular and biofilm reactor applications due to the mixing provided by the VF. The generation of Taylor vortices in Couette cells has been studied by MRM to characterize the dynamics of hydrodynamic instabilities [56], The presence of the coherent flow structures renders the mass transfer coefficient approaches of limited utility, as in the biofilm capillary reactor, due to the inability to incorporate microscale details of the advection field into the mass transfer coefficient model. [Pg.528]

Mass-transfer coefficient models for the vapor and liquid coefficients are of the general form... [Pg.25]

TABLE 15-18 Example Mass-Transfer Coefficient Models... [Pg.1754]

The mass-transfer efficiencies of various MHF contactors have been studied by many researchers. Dahuron and Cussler [AlChE 34(1), pp. 130-136 (1988)] developed a membrane mass-transfer coefficient model (k ) Yang and Cussler [AIChE /., 32(11), pp. 1910-1916 (1986)] developed a shell-side mass-transfer coefficient model (ks) for flow directed radially into the fibers and Prasad and Sirkar [AIChE /., 34(2), pp. 177-188 (1988)] developed a tube-side mass-transfer coefficient model (k,). Additional studies have been published by Prasad and Sirkar [ Membrane-Based Solvent Extraction, in Membrane Handbook, Ho and Sirkar, eds. (Chapman Hall, 1992)] by Reed, Semmens, and Cussler [ Membrane Contactors, Membrane Separations Technology Principle. and Applications, Noble and Stern, eds. (Elsevier, 1995)] by Qin and Cabral [MChE 43(8), pp. 1975-1988 (1997)] by Baudot, Floury, and Smorenburg [AIChE ]., 47(8), pp. 1780-1793 (2001)] by GonzSlez-Munoz et al. [/. Memhane Sci., 213(1-2), pp. 181-193 (2003) and J. Membrane Sci., 255(1-2), pp. 133-140 (2005)] by Saikia, Dutta, and Dass [/. Membrane Sci., 225(1-2), pp. 1-13 (2003)] by Bocquet et al. [AIChE... [Pg.1790]

For heat transfer the film theory is the most commonly used model, and the physical picture of a laminar film in which the whole temperature difference is situated leads to a result analogous to the mass transfer coefficient model [5]. After integrating Fourier s law over the film, a comparison with the heat transfer coefficient model (5.126) yields ... [Pg.614]

Film Theory. Many theories have been put forth to explain and correlate experimentally measured mass transfer coefficients. The classical model has been the film theory (13,26) that proposes to approximate the real situation at the interface by hypothetical "effective" gas and Hquid films. The fluid is assumed to be essentially stagnant within these effective films making a sharp change to totally turbulent flow where the film is in contact with the bulk of the fluid. As a result, mass is transferred through the effective films only by steady-state molecular diffusion and it is possible to compute the concentration profile through the films by integrating Fick s law ... [Pg.21]

Other correlations based partially on theoretical considerations but made to fit existing data also exist (71—75). A number of researchers have also attempted to separate from a by measuring the latter, sometimes in terms of the wetted area (76—78). Finally, a number of correlations for the mass transfer coefficient itself exist. These ate based on a mote fundamental theory of mass transfer in packed columns (79—82). Although certain predictions were verified by experimental evidence, these models often cannot serve as design basis because the equations contain the interfacial area as an independent variable. [Pg.37]

The main conclusion to be drawn from these studies is that for most practical purposes the linear rate model provides an adequate approximation and the use of the more cumbersome and computationally time consuming diffusing models is generally not necessary. The Glueckauf approximation provides the required estimate of the effective mass transfer coefficient for a diffusion controlled system. More detailed analysis shows that when more than one mass transfer resistance is significant the overall rate coefficient may be estimated simply from the sum of the resistances (7) ... [Pg.264]

The enhanced rate expressions for regimes 3 and 4 have been presented (48) and can be appHed (49,50) when one phase consists of a pure reactant, for example in the saponification of an ester. However, it should be noted that in the more general case where component C in equation 19 is transferred from one inert solvent (A) to another (B), an enhancement of the mass-transfer coefficient in the B-rich phase has the effect of moving the controlling mass-transfer resistance to the A-rich phase, in accordance with equation 17. Resistance in both Hquid phases is taken into account in a detailed model (51) which is apphcable to the reversible reactions involved in metal extraction. This model, which can accommodate the case of interfacial reaction, has been successfully compared with rate data from the Hterature (51). [Pg.64]

To model convection drying both the heat transfer to the coated web and the mass transfer (qv) from the coatiag must be considered. The heat-transfer coefficient can be taken as proportional to the 0.78 power of the air velocity or to the 0.39 power of the pressure difference between the air in the plenum and the ambient pressure at the coatiag. The improvement in heat-transfer coefficients in dryers since the 1900s is shown in Figure 20. The mass-transfer coefficient for solvent to the air stream is proportional to the heat-transfer coefficient and is related to it by the Clulton-Colbum analogy... [Pg.315]

The Shei wood-number relation for gas-phase mass-transfer coefficients as represented by the film diffusion model in Eq. (5-286) can be rearrangecTas follows ... [Pg.604]

Mass-transfer coefficients are derived from models. They must be employed in a similar model. For example, if an arithmetic concentration difference was used to determine k, that k should only be used in a mass-transfer expression with an arithmetic concentration difference. [Pg.606]

Example 8 Calculation of Rate-Based Distillation The separation of 655 lb mol/h of a bubble-point mixture of 16 mol % toluene, 9.5 mol % methanol, 53.3 mol % styrene, and 21.2 mol % ethylbenzene is to be earned out in a 9.84-ft diameter sieve-tray column having 40 sieve trays with 2-inch high weirs and on 24-inch tray spacing. The column is equipped with a total condenser and a partial reboiler. The feed wiU enter the column on the 21st tray from the top, where the column pressure will be 93 kPa, The bottom-tray pressure is 101 kPa and the top-tray pressure is 86 kPa. The distillate rate wiU be set at 167 lb mol/h in an attempt to obtain a sharp separation between toluene-methanol, which will tend to accumulate in the distillate, and styrene and ethylbenzene. A reflux ratio of 4.8 wiU be used. Plug flow of vapor and complete mixing of liquid wiU be assumed on each tray. K values will be computed from the UNIFAC activity-coefficient method and the Chan-Fair correlation will be used to estimate mass-transfer coefficients. Predict, with a rate-based model, the separation that will be achieved and back-calciilate from the computed tray compositions, the component vapor-phase Miirphree-tray efficiencies. [Pg.1292]

FIG. 17-14 Biihhling-hed model of Kunii and Levenspiel. dy = effective hiih-ble diameter, = concentration of A in hiihhle, = concentration of A in cloud, = concentration of A in emulsion, y = volumetric gas flow into or out of hiihhle, ky,- = mass-transfer coefficient between bubble and cloud, and k,. = mass-transfer coefficient between cloud and emulsion. (From Kunii and Leoen-spiel, Fluidization Engineering, Wiley, New York, 1.96.9, and Ktieger, Malahar, Fla., 1977.)... [Pg.1567]

When the two liquid phases are in relative motion, the mass transfer coefficients in eidrer phase must be related to die dynamical properties of the liquids. The boundary layer thicknesses are related to the Reynolds number, and the diffusive Uansfer to the Schmidt number. Another complication is that such a boundaty cannot in many circumstances be regarded as a simple planar interface, but eddies of material are U ansported to the interface from the bulk of each liquid which change the concenuation profile normal to the interface. In the simple isothermal model there is no need to take account of this fact, but in most indusuial chcumstances the two liquids are not in an isothermal system, but in one in which there is a temperature gradient. The simple stationary mass U ansfer model must therefore be replaced by an eddy mass U ansfer which takes account of this surface replenishment. [Pg.326]

A pulse of a racemic mixture (5 g each enantiomer) was carried out to check the adsorption model and to predict the mass transfer coefficient. The other model parameters used in simulation were = 0.4 and Pe = 1000. The mass transfer coefficient used to fit experimental and model predictions in the pulse experiment was k = 0.4 s k Model and experimental results are compared in Figs. 9-16 and 9-17. [Pg.244]

Table 3.1 shows the kinetic parameters for cell growth, rate models with or without inhibition and mass transfer coefficient calculation at various acetate concentrations in the culture media. The Monod constant value, KM, in the liquid phase depends on some parameters such as temperature, initial concentration of the carbon source, presence of trace metals, vitamin B solution, light intensity and agitation speeds. The initial acetate concentrations in the liquid phase reflected the value of the Monod constants, Kp and Kp. The average value for maximum specific growth rate (/xm) was 0.01 h. The value... [Pg.64]

In the Danckwerts model, it is assumed that elements of the surface have an age distribution ranging from zero to infinity. Obtain the age distribution function for this model and apply it to obtain the average, mass Iransfer coefficient at the surface, given that from the penetration theory the mass transfer coefficient for surface of age t is VlD/(7rt, where D is the diffusivity. [Pg.857]

The gas phase mass transfer coefficient for the absorption of ammonia into water from a mixture of composition NHj 20%, N2 73%, Hj 7% is found experimentally to be 0.030 m/s. What would you expect the transfer coefficient to be for a mixture of composition NH3 5%, N2 60%, Hj 35% All compositions are given on a molar basis. The total pressure and temperature are die same in both cases. The transfer coefficients are based on a steady-state film model and the effective film thickness may be assumed constant. Neglect the solubility of Ny and Hi in water. [Pg.859]

When two or more phases are present, it is rarely possible to design a reactor on a strictly first-principles basis. Rather than starting with the mass, energy, and momentum transport equations, as was done for the laminar flow systems in Chapter 8, we tend to use simplified flow models with empirical correlations for mass transfer coefficients and interfacial areas. The approach is conceptually similar to that used for friction factors and heat transfer coefficients in turbulent flow systems. It usually provides an adequate basis for design and scaleup, although extra care must be taken that the correlations are appropriate. [Pg.381]

These simple situations can be embellished. For example, the axial dispersion model can be applied to the piston flow elements. However, uncertainties in reaction rates and mass transfer coefficients are likely to mask secondary effects such as axial dispersion. [Pg.382]


See other pages where Mass transfer coefficient models: is mentioned: [Pg.1754]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.1748]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.1754]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.1748]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.1291]    [Pg.1292]    [Pg.1567]    [Pg.1567]    [Pg.2003]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.400]   


SEARCH



Mass coefficient

Mass models

Mass transfer coefficient

Mass transfer models

Models coefficients

Transfer model

© 2024 chempedia.info