Making More Complex Alkanes

Once we see how the C-C bonds are made, we just assume them directly. So, in a linear alkane, we have a backbone of C-C bonding orbitals. The terminal methyl groups make C-C bonds with their respective u(out) orbitals. In addition, each CH3 group contributes three C-H bonding orbitals, one or(CH3) and two tt(CH3), while each CH2 contributes two C-H bonding orbitals, one o-(CH2) and one it(CH2). 

This model of alkane bonding is useful, but admittedly, it really does not produce any new insights compared to the more conventional model emphasizing sp hybridized carbons and simple localized a bonds. Frankly, if we only ever considered alkanes, there would be no need for CH2 and CH3 group orbitals. However, we will now show that in more interesting molecules, the use of group orbitals provides very valuable insights. 

5 Three More Examples of Building Larger Molecules from Group Orbitals 

---

The effect of the oil chain length or alkane carbon number (ACN) is slightly more complex to understand, since it alters two interactions with opposite effects. In order to make a qualitative interpretation it can be stated as a first approximation that these London-style interactions are proportional to the number of methylene groups in each interacting molecule [28]. Thus,... 

Equation (1) depicts an early example of an intermolecular addition of an alkane C-H bond to a low valent transition metal complex [12], Mechanistic investigations provided strong evidence that these reactions occur via concerted oxidative addition wherein the metal activates the C-H bond directly by formation of the dative bond, followed by formation of an alkylmetal hydride as the product (Boxl). Considering the overall low reactivity of alkanes, transition metals were able to make the C-H bonds more reactive or activate them via a new process. Many in the modern organometallic community equated C-H bond activation with the concerted oxidative addition mechanism [10b,c]. 

Metallo-phthallocyanine (MePc) complexes are known as mild oxygenation catalysts for alkanes and alkenes and as functional models for enzymes, more in particular for monooxygenases like Cytochrome P450.[44] Among the many possible supports for such complexes, zeolite FAU topologies1451 are excellent materials for their encapsulation. [46 50] The low solubility of Me Pc complexes in general and their tendency to form adducts even in solution, giving rise to self-oxidation and subsequent self-destruction phenomena, make them the ideal candidates for their distribution as individual species on a solid support. 

Note that the examples selected in the two original nodal nomenclature reports ([19] and [20]) and in the Dyson system [49] reports are all from the much simpler class of alkanes. Moreover, both the nodal and the Dyson systems have an increase in complexity when naming molecules having multiple types of atoms, a disadvantage that the proposed nomenclature system does not have. To the contrary, because atomic symbols are included in the first "layer of information" about a chemical moiety, there is no need to create a second layer of information in which the names of the different atoms are listed. This inclusion of atom symbols immediately makes for a more user-friendly nomenclature, especially for rapidly scanning a name to see whether it is the moiety under consideration. 

CH Activation is sometimes used rather too loosely to cover a wide variety of situations in which CH bonds are broken. As Sames has most recently pointed out, the term was first adopted to make a distinction between organic reactions in which CH bonds are broken by classical mechanistic pathways, and the class of reactions involving transition metals that avoid these pathways and their consequences in terms of reaction selectivity. For example, radicals such as RO- and -OH readily abstract an H atom from alkanes, RH, to give the alkyl radical R. Also in this class, are some of the metal catalyzed oxidations, such as the Gif reaction and Fenton chemistry see Oxidation Catalysis by Transition Metal Complexes). Since this reaction tends to occur at the weakest CH bond, the most highly substituted R tends to be formed, for example, iPr-and not nPn from propane. Likewise, electrophilic reagents such as superacids see Superacid), readily abstract a H ion from an alkane. The selectivity is even more strongly in favor of the more substituted carbonium ion product such as iPr+ and not nPr+ from propane. The result is that in any subsequent fimctionalization, the branched product is obtained, for example, iPrX and not nPrX (Scheme 1). 

EIEs provide invaluable information concerning both molecular structure and the determination of reaction mechanisms. EIEs are traditionally defined as the ratio of equilibrium constants for unlabeled and labeled reactants and products (EIE = A h/A d Figure 2). For oxidative addition and reductive elimination reactions, the presence of intermediates along the reaction coordinate, such as alkane cr-complexes and agostic interactions, make these reactions multistep processes and hence, additional terms are necessary in order to more fully describe the overall mechanism. Thus, reductive elimination may consist of a reductive coupling (rc) step followed by dissociation (d), whereas the microscopic reverse, oxidative addition, could consist of ligand association (a) followed by oxidative cleavage (oc), as illustrated in Scheme 6. 

The halide alkanes when used as HA perturbers make the system easily turbid under excessive amount. This makes the studying of inclusion equilibrium more difficult. While the halide alcohol perturbers, for example, 2-bromoethanol and 2,3-dibromopropanol, participating in the formation of inclusion complex as water-soluble third component is more favorable. First, Hamai [44] and sequentially Spanish researchers [45-47] reported the relevant results. 

---