Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Lowest achievable emission rate technology

We should note that in a general sense, the objective of pollution abatement is compliance. Whether we apply conventional controls or P2, the intent is to develop corrective actions that largely focus on the lowest achievable emission rate (LAER) technologies, and only sometimes on best available control technologies (BACT),... [Pg.354]

Titles I and IV are most relevant to SO, and NO control. Title I establishes a 24-hour average ambient air standard for SO, of 0.14 ppm. The NO provisions require existing major stationaiy sources to apply reasonably available control technologies and new or modified major stationaiy sources to offset their new emissions and install controls representing the lowest achievable emissions rate. Each state with an ozone nonattaininent region must develop a State Implementation Plan (SIP) that includes stationaiy NO emissions reductions. [Pg.444]

Cracking (FCC) units have been established through consent decree between the EPA and the rehnery or by the application of new source review (NSR) provisions of the Clean Air Act when making rehnery modihcations that result in a signihcant emission increase. NSR standards require facilities to apply best available control technology (BACT) in ozone attainment areas and the lowest achievable emissions rate (LAER) in ozone nonattainment areas. In addition, in mid-2009, the U.S. EPA revised the Standards of Performance for Petroleum Rehneries (40 CFR 60 Subpart Ja) to include NO, standards for process heaters and FCCUs. [Pg.317]

Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT), Best Available Control Technology (BACT), and Lowest Achievable Emission Rate (LAER) Clearinghouse... [Pg.205]

The SCONOx process has been introduced in very few cogeneration units in United States, including the 32-MW Sunlaw Federal cogeneration facility, the Wyeth Biopharma plant (5 MW), and the 15-MW University of California, San Diego cogeneration facility. NO emission levels at or below 1.0 ppm have been demonstrated. However, the costs associated with the catalyst and the mechanical installation make this technology more expensive than SCR, so that its use is very limited and confined to either lowest achievable emission rate (LAER) technology or NHa-limited applications. [Pg.1734]

Note BACT stands for Best Available Control Technology. LAER for Lowest Achievable Emission Rate. NSPSfor New Source Performance Standard, PSD for Prevention of Significant Deterioration. SCR far Selective Catalytic Reduction. SIP far State Implementation Plan. SNCR for Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction, and WEPCOfor Wisconsin Electric Power Company. [Pg.871]


See other pages where Lowest achievable emission rate technology is mentioned: [Pg.70]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.230]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.415 ]




SEARCH



Achievability

Achievable

Achievement

Achievers

Emission rates

Lowest achievable emission rate

© 2024 chempedia.info