Liquid surface energy alloys

The first term results from the heat of mixing of A-B alloy (see equations (4.3) and (4.4)). The second term comes from the cohesion energies of pure A and pure B and is related to the liquid surface energies adhesion energy of pure A and B on the external phase. When the external phase is the vapour, B ex = A-ex = 0 and the molar adsorption energy is reduced to equation (4.8) ... 

Figure 6.28. a) Effect of small additions of an alloying element on the interfacial or liquid surface energies of a non-reactive binary alloy/ceramic system for very positive and very negative values of adsorption energy, b) A very negative value of the slope of 0 implies a negligible slope... 

Figure 4.7. Experimental (Eremenko et al. 1961) and calculated surface energy curves for liquid Cu-AI alloys at 1373K. The calculated curves were obtained taking

Rapid fluid flow cannot be achieved with active metal brazes because of the need to form solid wettable reaction product layers for their liquid fronts to advance. Equations (10.1) to (10.2) relating liquid flow rates to the opposed effects of surface energy imbalances and of viscous drag are not relevant. Actual penetration rates are so slow, usually of the order of 1 pm.s, that the usual practice is to place the active metal braze alloy within the joints rather than expecting it to fill them, and, as explained already, gap width is not the dominant consideration when designing ceramic-metal joints. 

In any brazing/soldering process, a molten alloy comes in contact with a surface of solid, which may be an alloy, a ceramic, or a composite material (see Ceramics Composite materials). For a molten alloy to advance over the soHd surface a special relationship has to exist between surface energies of the liquid—gas, soHd—gas, and Hquid—soHd interfaces. The same relationships should, in principle, hold in joining processes where a molten alloy has to fiU the gaps existing between surfaces of the parts to be joined. In general, the molten alloy should have a lower surface tension than that of the base material. 

The reliability of the data used for the evaluation of the melting phenomena of the nano-sized particles, especially the surface energies of liquid and solid alloys. 

For the application of this equation one has to measure surface energy (surface tension) and its dependence on electrode potential at constant activities of the different components. Precise measurements are restricted to liquid metals like mercury or gallium and their alloys. Classical experiments were made with the Lippmann electrocapillary meter. The measurement of the drop time or the drop frequency of a dropping mercury electrode is easier. 

Bau] Baum, B.A., Pavars, LA., Geld, P.V., Density and Surface Energy of Liquid Chromium-Iron-Silicon Alloys , Russ. J. Phys. Chem. (Engl. Transl.), 43(10), 1379-1382 (1969) (Experimental, 9)... 

The surface energies of alloys are influenced by composition. This can be seen from Table 2.1 for the case of Ni-Cu alloys, for which y decreases monotonically with Cu concentration. Similar effects are observed for oxide solutions. For example, additions of Na20 and P2O5 have been shown to dramatically decrease the surface energy of liquid FeO [9]. 

G. P. Khilya and Yu. I. Vashchenko, 1973, Free surface energy and density of liquid copper-silicon alloys , Dopov Akad Nauk Ukr RSR Ser. B 35, 69-72. 

A huge database has been established regarding the temperature coefficient of siuface tension for metals, alloys, and polymers. Tables 24.1a and 24.1b tabulate the data for some typical samples and includes information derived and discussed later in Sect. 24.4.2. The temperature dependence of surface tension provided an opportunity for one to derive information regarding atomic cohesive energy in the bulk and with possible mechanism for the adsorbate-induced surface stress. The latter could be a challenging topic of research on adsorption of various adsorbates to liquid surfaces of relatively low-Tn, metals. 

Monotectic reactions in which a liquid phase decomposes to form a solid and another liquid phase (Fig. 5.15) have also received little attention. The experimental work of Delves and the theoretical treatment of Chadwick showed that either regular rod-like structures or macroscopic phase separation should occur, depending on the various interphase surface energies. Subsequently Livingston and Cline,working with copper-lead alloys, established that the growth conditions also had a marked influence on the nature of the transformation structure. Their results are summarised in Fig. 5.16. It would be valuable if these studies could be extended to other suitable systems. 

---