Liquid storage tanks tank details

American Standard API 650 (American Petroleum Institute 2007) uses a similar concept to account for the capacity of the tank to dissipate seismic energy through the so-called response modification factor or simply reduction factor, denoted by R. The response modification factor for ground-supported, liquid storage tanks designed and detailed to these provisions shall be less than or equal to the values shown in Table E-4 of API 650. 

A detailed supply-chain model, which showed that two days inventory was required to supply the forecast market demand, determined chlorine storage tank number and size. The minimum number of drums and cylinders of liquid chlorine required to be held on-site was also calculated from the supply-chain model. This approach was also extended to calculation of the number and size of storage tanks for products such as caustic soda, sodium hypochlorite and hydrochloric acid. 

In order to provide the necessary amount of liquid to hydraulically load each tray and maintain countercurrent operation in the overall tower, it is necessary to recirculate liquid over each tray by using an external pump. This detail is not shown in the flow diagram. The product gas passes through a conventional mist eliminator and reheater (50°F reheat is typical) and is then vented to the stack. The rich solution from the bottom of the absorption section is pumped to a storage tank, which provides feed to the r nraation portion of the plant. 

These substances are used on site for water treatment further details regarding use of these substances are provided in UKP-GW-GL-035 (Reference 14.23). These substances are stored in liquid/solution form in tanks located within the turbine building (Table 6.4.1 of the EDCD, Reference 14.2). Tank locations within the building will be subject to detailed design/layout. These substances are used primarily in association with the cooling water system and are stored in the circulating water system (CWS) area, in an area reserved for chemical storage. 

Another recently proposed small-scale depot demonstration of LH2 storage and transfer in LEO was the proposed Cryogenic Orbital Testbed (CRYOYE-LFTE) mission from the United Launch Alliance (ULA), which considered the transfer of propellant from a Centaur upper stage to the CRYOTE receiver tank. The CRYOTE tank would be launched empty as a secondary payload on Centaur once the primary payload has been delivered. Centaur and CRYOYE would detach, and Centaur would supply liquid to an empty CRYOTE tank. Once in orbit, CRYOTE could then conduct short term storage tests. Details and proposed experimental requirements for this test (Pikes et al., 2006 Gravlee et al., 2010 McLean et al., 2011), as well as older Centaur-based experiments (Schuster and Brown, 1987), are available in the literature. 

---