Linear free energy relationships commonly used

The linear free energy relationship was used in Chapter 2 to include microscopic effects such as those of substrate and solvent structures in liquid-phase reactions. The Hammett relationship is the most commonly used empirical expression to predict these effects. When a catalyst is present in solid form, generalizations are less tenable, and it is best to analyze each reaction separately for any solvent effect. Even so, some generalizations are available which, though of limited value, merit brief mention. We confine the treatment in this section to specific examples of reactions in which solvents have been used to good purpose. 

The structure-reactivity relationship is a concept familiar to every organic chemist. As commonly used it refers to a linear free energy relationship, such as the Bronsted or Hammett equations, or some more general measure of the effect of changing substituent on the rate or equilibrium of a reaction. A substituent constant is conveniently defined as the effect of the substituent on the free-energy change for a control reaction. So the so-called structure-reactivity relationship is in fact usually a reactivity-reactivity relationship. 

Since such correlations belong to a series of treatments which are commonly identified as Linear Free Energy Relationships (LFER), and as only the standard potential is an electrochemical quantity directly linked with free energy (AG° = -n F AE°), one can make use of these mathematical treatments only in cases of electrochemically reversible redox processes (or in the limit of quasireversibility). Only in these cases does the measured redox potential have thermodynamic significance. 

Because of this linear free-energy relationship (LFER), logP is commonly used in most correlation studies instead of P. 

Numerous relationships exist among the structural characteristics, physicochemical properties, and/or biological qualities of classes of related compounds. Simple examples include bivariate correlations between physicochemical properties such as aqueous solubility and octanol-water partition coefficients (Jtow) and correlations between equilibrium constants of related sets of compounds. Perhaps the best-known attribute relationships to chemists are the correlations between reaction rate constants and equilibrium constants for related reactions commonly known as linear free-energy relationships or LFERs. The LFER concept also leads to the broader concepts of property-activity and structure-activity relationships (PARs and SARs), which seek to predict the environmental fate of related compounds or their bioactivity (bioaccumulation, biodegradation, toxicity) based on correlations with physicochemical properties or structural features of the compounds. Table 1 summarizes the types of attribute relationships that have been used in chemical fate studies and defines some important terms used in these relationships. 

This kind of procedure, i. e. empirical estimation of solvent polarity with the aid of actual chemical or physical reference processes, is very common in chemistry. The well-known Hammett equation for the calculation of substituent effects on reaction rates and chemical equilibria, was introduced in 1937 by Hammett using the ionization of meta-ox /iflra-substituted benzoic acids in water at 25 °C as a reference process in much the same way [10]. Usually, the functional relationships between substituent or solvent parameters and various substituent- or solvent-dependent processes take the form of a linear Gibbs energy relationship, frequently still referred to as a linear free-energy (LFE) relationship [11-15, 125-127]. 

Cavity surfaces Earliest continuum models made use of oversimplified cavities for the insertion of the solute in the dielectric medium such as spheres or ellipsoids. In the last decades, the concept of molecular surface as become more common. Thus, the surface has been used in microscopic models of solution. Linear relationships were also found between molecular surfaces and solvation free energies. Moreover, given that molecular surfaces can help us in the calculation of the interaction of a solute molecule with surroundings of solvent molecules, they are one of the main tools in understanding the solution processes and solvent effects on chemical systems. Another popular application is the generation of graphic displays. ... 

---