Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Limiting Experimental Values

Table 1 summarizes the trends in the structures and bond dissociation energies of hydrides (MH , n = 1, 2 and 3 for M = As, Sb and Bi) calculated with the CASSCF/CI method together with the available experimental data. The spectroscopic properties and potential energy curves for monohydrides (MH) have been fully summarized by Balasubramanian. Even for simple hydrides, there are only few experimental data for comparison. As Table 1 shows, however, good agreement is seen between the calculated and limited experimental values. This will permit the periodic trends to be discussed on the basis of the calculated values. [Pg.70]

The summation extends over all the ions present at concentrations c in M multiplied by their stoichiometric coefficients vi (Marcus 2009b). The radius of a hydrated ion, rihydr, may be taken as the sum of the ionic radius and the diameter of a water molecule (see below), so that it is possible to estimate the concentration at which the hydration shells start to overlap d aqueous NaCl and is lower still for solutions of unsymmetrical multivalent electrolytes (1 2, etc.). Below the overlap limit experimental values of (dVildP)T may be used for the estimation of the hydration numbers at finite concentrations from the expression (2.10) for Aicomp given above. [Pg.57]

In all other cases the observed result will depend upon both the speed of mixing and the speed of nitration. The relative rate will be greater than unity by an amount peculiar to the conditions of the experiment. Again, if the alkylbenzene is sufficiently reactive to be nitrated upon encounter, whilst benzene is not, the relative rate will be greater than unity and, for the experimental conditions, will be a limiting upper value no matter what aromatic is used. [Pg.65]

Comparison of this result with Example 3.1 shows that T AS and AH are of the same order of magnitude. Example 3.1 stressed that the value of AH estimated there was an upper limit. Experimental results show that the assumption of ideality-while a slight oversimplification-generally introduces an error of less than 10%. Comparison of the two examples shows how much more difficult it... [Pg.148]

If the experimental values of Rg vary with 0, then the effects of interference are demonstrated. We shall see later in this section that these effects can be eliminated by extrapolating Rg values to 0 = 0°, at which limit Eq. (10.60) also applies. [Pg.690]

Flash points, lower and upper flammability limits, and autoignition temperatures are the three properties used to indicate safe operating limits of temperature when processing organic materials. Prediction methods are somewhat erratic, but, together with comparisons with reliable experimental values for families or similar compounds, they are valuable in setting a conservative value for each of the properties. The DIPPR compilation includes evaluated values for over 1000 common organics. Detailed examples of most of the methods discussed are available in Danner and Daubert."... [Pg.418]

A tabulation of the ECPSSR cross sections for proton and helium-ion ionization of Kand L levels in atoms can be used for calculations related to PIXE measurements. Some representative X-ray production cross sections, which are the product of the ionization cross sections and the fluorescence yields, are displayed in Figure 1. Although these A shell cross sections have been found to agree with available experimental values within 10%, which is adequate for standardless PKE, the accuracy of the i-shell cross sections is limited mainly by the uncertainties in the various Zrshell fluorescence yields. Knowledge of these yields is necessary to conven X-ray ionization cross sections to production cross sections. Of course, these same uncertainties apply to the EMPA, EDS, and XRF techniques. The Af-shell situation is even more complicated. [Pg.359]

With increasing values of P the molar volume is in progressively better agreement with the experimental values. Upon heating a phase transition takes place from the a phase to an orientationally disordered fee phase at the transition temperature where we find a jump in the molar volume (Fig. 6), the molecular energy, and in the order parameter. The transition temperature of our previous classical Monte Carlo study [290,291] is T = 42.5( 0.3) K, with increasing P, T is shifted to smaller values, and in the quantum limit we obtain = 38( 0.5) K, which represents a reduction of about 11% with respect to the classical value. [Pg.97]

The magnitude of the core correlation can be evaluated by including the oxygen Is-electrons and using the cc-pCVXZ basis sets the results are shown in Table 11.9. The extrapolated CCSD(T) correlation energy is —0.370 a.u. Assuming that the CCSD(T) method provides 99.7% of the full Cl value, as indicated by Table 11.7, the extrapolated correlation energy becomes —0.371 a.u., well within the error limits on the estimated experimental value. The core (and core-valence) electron correlation is thus 0.063 a.u.. [Pg.268]

We will now look at how different types of wave functions behave when the O-H bond is stretched. The basis set used in all cases is the aug-cc-pVTZ, and the reference curve is taken as the [8, 8J-CASSCF result, which is slightly larger than a full-valence Cl. As mentioned in Section 4.6, this allows a correct dissociation, and since all the valence electrons are correlated, it will generate a curve close to the full Cl limit. The bond dissociation energy calculated at this level is 122.1 kcaPmol, which is comparable to the experimental value of 125.9 kcal/mol. [Pg.276]

The aforementioned exception and the rather limited experimental material available do not allow any conclusions about the general applicability of the Hammett equation, using the same a- and p-values as for benzenes, to be drawn with certainty. The present author has pointed out that large deviations should be expected with strong - -M-substituents, as is also indicated from the rates of alkaline hydrolysis of methyl 5-amino- and 5-acylamino-2-thenoates. From the chemical shifts in the NMR spectra of thiophenes and benzenes it appears that another set of cr-values should be used in the thiophenes series which seems plausible since the transmission of the sub-... [Pg.81]

Figure 18 We - 8 plot comparison of the experimental values with the theoretical limit. Figure 18 We - 8 plot comparison of the experimental values with the theoretical limit.
To examine the details of the structure of flames in channels under quenching conditions, numerical methods were used. Two-dimensional CFD simulation of a propane flame approaching a channel between parallel plates was carried out using the FLUENT code [25]. The model reproduced the geometry of the real channels investigated experimentally. Close to the quenching limit, the burning velocity, dead space, and radius of curvature of the flames were all close to the experimental values. [Pg.107]

This leaves us with a computed resuit in iess than satisfactory agreement with the experimental value of about 170 kcal/mol(57). The neglect of electron correlation and the limited basis set used are the most important sources of the discrepancy. In a previous study on monolayer graphite(56), basis set effects were found to lead to a significant underestimation of the cohesive energy. [Pg.40]

If not otherwise stated the four-component Dirac method was used. The Hartree-Fock (HF) calculations are numerical and contain Breit and QED corrections (self-energy and vacuum polarization). For Au and Rg, the Fock-space coupled cluster (CC) results are taken from Kaldor and co-workers [4, 90], which contains the Breit term in the low-frequency limit. For Cu and Ag, Douglas-Kroll scalar relativistic CCSD(T) results are used from Sadlej and co-workers [6]. Experimental values are from Refs. [91, 92]. [Pg.190]


See other pages where Limiting Experimental Values is mentioned: [Pg.61]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.494]    [Pg.666]    [Pg.697]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.350]   


SEARCH



Experimental value

Limiting value

Mass transfer limitations experimental values

© 2024 chempedia.info