Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Lennard-Jones 7 atom system

Fig. 3.5 The radial distribution function is shown for the Lennard-Jones 7-atom system at constant energy. The peaks in the radial distribution function correspond to common separations observed among the atoms at the potential energy minima. Shaded pairs in the diagrams illustrate the locations within the atomic arrangements where these probable distances are found... Fig. 3.5 The radial distribution function is shown for the Lennard-Jones 7-atom system at constant energy. The peaks in the radial distribution function correspond to common separations observed among the atoms at the potential energy minima. Shaded pairs in the diagrams illustrate the locations within the atomic arrangements where these probable distances are found...
Fig. 6.11. The error in the free energy measured by several NEW implementations. Results are from Monte Carlo simulations of ion charging in water at 298 K. System 0 consists of a single Lennard-Jones atom with charge of +le and 216 SPC water molecules, and system 1 is the same but with the charge turned off. One work cycle contains 100 nonuniform steps in 7 from 0 to 1 and back. For a detailed description of the simulation, see [43]... Fig. 6.11. The error in the free energy measured by several NEW implementations. Results are from Monte Carlo simulations of ion charging in water at 298 K. System 0 consists of a single Lennard-Jones atom with charge of +le and 216 SPC water molecules, and system 1 is the same but with the charge turned off. One work cycle contains 100 nonuniform steps in 7 from 0 to 1 and back. For a detailed description of the simulation, see [43]...
The picture of a solute molecule stabilized in solution by a local environment where the solvent s concentration differs considerably from the bulk value is consistent with experiments and simulation. The encouraging agreement between the basic trends found in experiments and simulations should not obscure the fact that Lennard-Jones atoms are a pedestrian representation of the actual molecules studied in the fluorescence experiments. Caution must therefore be exercised when comparing simulations and experiments. At the same time, the very fact that such a crude model is able to capture the essential physics of the phenomenon under investigation lends further support to the notion that local density augmentations are common to all attractive supercritical systems. [Pg.74]

The computer simulations employed the molecular dynamics technique, in which particles are moved deterministically by integrating their equations of motion. The system size was 864 Lennard-Jones atoms, of which one was the solute (see Table II for potential parameters). There were no solute-solute interactions. Periodic boundary conditions and the minimum image criterion were used (76). The cutoff radius for binary interactions was 3.5 G (see Table II). Potentials were truncated beyond the cutoff. [Pg.76]

Figure 6, Profiles of the density as a fimction of z, the distance from the center of a parallel-walled slh. The vertical lines show the planes of solid that make up the pore. The density is shown for a conqjletely wet (part a) and a con letely dry (part b) surface. Both the fluid adsorbate and the solid adsorbent are made up of Lennard-Jones atoms with well-depth ratios % /% = 0.85 (part a) and 0.30 (part b). The simulations were performed under conditions such that each system was at bulk liquid-vapor coexistence for 0.7. From Ref [31], J. Stat. Phys. Figure 6, Profiles of the density as a fimction of z, the distance from the center of a parallel-walled slh. The vertical lines show the planes of solid that make up the pore. The density is shown for a conqjletely wet (part a) and a con letely dry (part b) surface. Both the fluid adsorbate and the solid adsorbent are made up of Lennard-Jones atoms with well-depth ratios % /% = 0.85 (part a) and 0.30 (part b). The simulations were performed under conditions such that each system was at bulk liquid-vapor coexistence for 0.7. From Ref [31], J. Stat. Phys.
Phase diagrams for strongly polar molecules in adsorbed films are still in the process of development even for the films on the basal plane of graphite [35]. These systems are made more complex because of the interplay of dipolar forces and molecular shape in determining preferred orientations relative to the surface and to neighboring molecules. A simulation of Stockmayer molecules (Lennard-Jones atoms with ideal dipoles attached) adsorbed on a featureless slit pore at low temperature [46] has shown that the dipoles tend to lie parallel to the surface in... [Pg.607]

The first sections of this chapter are devoted to a description of the method and practical details for its implementation and utilization. Subsequent sections extend the method to the detection and simulation of double shock waves, which are ubiquitous in condensed matter. Example applications are presented for a Lennard-Jones atomic potential system (which can provide a description of solid Argon), an empirical potential model of crystalline silicon, and a tight-binding atomic potential for the chemically reactive explosive nitromethane (CH3NO2). [Pg.298]

Recently, two molecular dynamics simulations were published in which hexatic phases were observed for particular systems. In one [69], the phase was observed for a particular concentration in a two-component mixture of Lennard-Jones atoms, and in the other [70], the hexatic phase appeared for an inverse 12th-power potential at a particular value of the pressure. It is unclear why these special conditions should produce the hexatic phase, so extensions of these studies would appear to be necessary. [Pg.351]

We now proceed to more realistic models of adsorption systems. As a preliminary step, comparative simulations of various gases on various model surfaces should be mentioned. These include hard spheres at a soft repulsive wall [73] and hard spheres, soft repulsive spheres, and Lennard-Jones atoms between hard, soft repulsive, and soft attractive walls [741. For coverages greater than one monolayer, these simulations show that the local density n z) is relatively insensitive to the detailed nature of the interactions [74]. It is the repulsive cores of the adsorbed atoms that are the determining factor. This point is illustrated in Fig. 9. [Pg.352]

This approach is frequently used because the perturbation series is more rapidly convergent and may be truncated after the first-order term. The effect of neglecting the attractive part of the nonbond potential on the intermolecular pair correlation function is shown in Fig. 1 for a system of Lennard-Jones atoms. At lower densities (Fig. la), the attractions lead to an overall decrease in the sttucture. This effect becomes negligible at melt-like densities (Fig. lb). [Pg.212]

The range of systems that have been studied by force field methods is extremely varied. Some force fields liave been developed to study just one atomic or molecular sp>ecies under a wider range of conditions. For example, the chlorine model of Rodger, Stone and TUdesley [Rodger et al 1988] can be used to study the solid, liquid and gaseous phases. This is an anisotropic site model, in which the interaction between a pair of sites on two molecules dep>ends not only upon the separation between the sites (as in an isotropic model such as the Lennard-Jones model) but also upon the orientation of the site-site vector with resp>ect to the bond vectors of the two molecules. The model includes an electrostatic component which contciins dipwle-dipole, dipole-quadrupole and quadrupole-quadrupole terms, and the van der Waals contribution is modelled using a Buckingham-like function. [Pg.249]

The shift makes the potential deviate from the true potential, and so any calculated thermodynamic properties will be changed. The true values can be retrieved but it is difficult to do so, and the shifted potential is thus rarely used in real simulations. Moreover, while it is relatively straightforward to implement for a homogeneous system under the influence of a simple potential such as the Lennard-jones potential, it is not easy for inhomogeneous systems containing rnany different types of atom. [Pg.345]

Here Tq are coordinates in a reference volume Vq and r = potential energy of Ar crystals has been computed [288] as well as lattice constants, thermal expansion coefficients, and isotope effects in other Lennard-Jones solids. In Fig. 4 we show the kinetic and potential energy of an Ar crystal in the canonical ensemble versus temperature for different values of P we note that in the classical hmit (P = 1) the low temperature specific heat does not decrease to zero however, with increasing P values the quantum limit is approached. In Fig. 5 the isotope effect on the lattice constant (at / = 0) in a Lennard-Jones system with parameters suitable for Ne atoms is presented, and a comparison with experimental data is made. Please note that in a classical system no isotope effect can be observed, x "" and the deviations between simulations and experiments are mainly caused by non-optimized potential parameters. [Pg.95]

LennarD-Jones, J. E., and Pople, J. A., Phil. Mag. 43, 581, Ser. 7, The spatial correlation of electrons in atoms and molecules. I. Helium and similar two-electron systems in their ground states. Analysis of in-out effect and angular effect. [Pg.332]

Figure 5. Velocity and temperature profiles for the cut-off Lennard-Jones potential. The system consists of 1152 atoms enclosed in a box of side length equal to 32 6 6. Figure 5. Velocity and temperature profiles for the cut-off Lennard-Jones potential. The system consists of 1152 atoms enclosed in a box of side length equal to 32 6 6.
It came as a surprise, however, that Aug prefers a trigonal planar D3h structure in the gas phase [16] and is not octahedral as one might assume, suggesting that gold clusters do not follow the usual pattern of typical Lennard-Jones, Morse or Gupta systems, which all favor a maximum number of close atom-atom contacts. The preferred planarity of small gold cluster compounds is due to relativistic effects [17]. [Pg.213]

The interatomic force between two atoms a distance R apart can be described in terms of the potential energy of the system P R), one widely applicable form of which is the Lennard -Jones potential ... [Pg.90]


See other pages where Lennard-Jones 7 atom system is mentioned: [Pg.99]    [Pg.599]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.563]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.563]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.473]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.287]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.118 ]




SEARCH



Atomic systems

Lennard

Lennard-Jones

Lennard-Jones system

Lennard-jones atoms

© 2024 chempedia.info