Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Layer mobile-diffuse

The effect known either as electroosmosis or electroendosmosis is a complement to that of electrophoresis. In the latter case, when a field F is applied, the surface or particle is mobile and moves relative to the solvent, which is fixed (in laboratory coordinates). If, however, the surface is fixed, it is the mobile diffuse layer that moves under an applied field, carrying solution with it. If one has a tube of radius r whose walls possess a certain potential and charge density, then Eqs. V-35 and V-36 again apply, with v now being the velocity of the diffuse layer. For water at 25°C, a field of about 1500 V/cm is needed to produce a velocity of 1 cm/sec if f is 100 mV (see Problem V-14). [Pg.185]

The objectives of this study were to (a) determine the mobilities of the herbicides, alachlor (2-chloro-2, 6 -diethyl-N-(me-thoxymethyl)acetanilide), butylate (S-ethyl diisobutylthiocarba-mate), and metolachlor (2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methyl phenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-l-methyl ethyl) acetamide in the laboratory using soil leaching columns and soil thin-layer vapor diffusion techniques,... [Pg.231]

Stern combined the ideas of Helmholtz and that of a diffuse layer [64], In Stern theory we take a pragmatic, though somewhat artificial, approach and divide the double layer into two parts an inner part, the Stern layer, and an outer part, the Gouy or diffuse layer. Essentially the Stern layer is a layer of ions which is directly adsorbed to the surface and which is immobile. In contrast, the Gouy-Chapman layer consists of mobile ions, which obey Poisson-Boltzmann statistics. The potential at the point where the bound Stern layer ends and the mobile diffuse layer begins is the zeta potential (C potential). The zeta potential will be discussed in detail in Section 5.4. [Pg.52]

Up till about 1921, it was often supposed that the potential could be identified with the single potential difference at the phase boundary. Freundlich and his collaborators1 showed that this is quite impossible, since the variation with concentration, and the influence of adsorbed substances, are entirely different in the two cases sometimes indeed the two potentials may have different signs. The phase boundary potential, if defined as the Volta potential, is the difference between the energy levels of the charged component, to which the phase boundary is permeable, inside the two phases when these are both at the same electrostatic potential. We have seen that it is difficult, or impossible, to define the phase boundary potential in any other way (see 2 and 3). It includes the work of extraction of the charged component from each phase, and this includes the part of the double layer which according to Stern s theory is fixed. The potential is merely the potential fall in the mobile, diffuse part of the double layer, and is wholly within one phase. [Pg.358]

Regarding the Stem-diffuse layer border, at low co the situation remains as In the static case. This situation has been discussed in sec. 3.13. At high frequency, polarization of the Stem layer may to a certain extent leak away via the, more mobile, diffuse part. Otherwise stated, the Stem layer is then shunted, or short-circuited, by the diffuse part. [Pg.588]

Figure 9.19. The diffuse double layer, (a) Diffuseness results from thermal motion in solution, (b) Schematic representation of ion binding on an oxide surface on the basis of the surface complexation model, s is the specific surface area (m kg ). Braces refer to concentrations in mol kg . (c) The electric surface potential, falls off (simplified model) with distance from the surface. The decrease with distance is exponential when l/ < 25 mV. At a distance k the potential has dropped by a factor of 1/c. This distance can be used as a measure of the extension (thickness) of l e double layer (see equation 40c). At the plane of shear (moving particle) a zeta potential can be established with the help of electrophoretic mobility measurements, (d) Variation of charge distribution (concentration of positive and negative ions) with distance from the surface (Z is the charge of the ion), (e) The net excess charge. Figure 9.19. The diffuse double layer, (a) Diffuseness results from thermal motion in solution, (b) Schematic representation of ion binding on an oxide surface on the basis of the surface complexation model, s is the specific surface area (m kg ). Braces refer to concentrations in mol kg . (c) The electric surface potential, falls off (simplified model) with distance from the surface. The decrease with distance is exponential when l/ < 25 mV. At a distance k the potential has dropped by a factor of 1/c. This distance can be used as a measure of the extension (thickness) of l e double layer (see equation 40c). At the plane of shear (moving particle) a zeta potential can be established with the help of electrophoretic mobility measurements, (d) Variation of charge distribution (concentration of positive and negative ions) with distance from the surface (Z is the charge of the ion), (e) The net excess charge.
Using SI units, the velocity of the electro-osmotic flow is expressed in meters per second (m/s) and the electric field in volts per meter (V/m). Consequently, in analogy to the electrophoretic mobility, the electro-osmotic mobility has the dimension square meters per volt per second. Because electro-osmotic and electrophoretic mobilities are converse manifestations of the same underlying phenomenon, the Hehnholtz-von Smoluchowski equation applies to electro-osmosis as well as to electrophoresis. In fact, when an electric field is applied to an ion, this moves relative to the electrolyte solution, whereas in the case of electro-osmosis, it is the mobile diffuse layer that moves under an appUed electric field, carrying the electrolyte solution with it. [Pg.585]

Mobility at the surface is very important for determining reaction rates, and the kinds of mobility involved are illustrated in fig. 25 and act as the basis for subdividing this section. These three subsections relate to diffusion in the weakly held layer (1), diffusion in strongly chemisorbed layers (2) and mobility of the surface atoms themselves (3). [Pg.319]

Trypsin in aqueous solution has been studied by a simulation with the conventional periodic boundary molecular dynamics method and an NVT ensemble.312 340 A total of 4785 water molecules were included to obtain a solvation shell four to five water molecules thick in the periodic box the analysis period was 20 ps after an equilibration period of 20 ps at 285 K. The diffusion coefficient for the water, averaged over all molecules, was 3.8 X 10-5 cm2/s. This value is essentially the same as that for pure water simulated with the same SPC model,341 3.6 X 10-5 cm2/s at 300 K. However, the solvent mobility was found to be strongly dependent on the distance from the protein. This is illustrated in Fig. 47, where the mean diffusion coefficient is plotted versus the distance of water molecules from the closest protein atom in the starting configuration the diffusion coefficient at the protein surface is less than half that of the bulk result. The earlier simulations of BPTI in a van der Waals solvent showed similar, though less dramatic behavior 193 i.e., the solvent molecules in the first and second solvation layers had diffusion coefficients equal to 74% and 90% of the bulk value. A corresponding reduction in solvent mobility is observed for water surrounding small biopolymers.163 Thus it... [Pg.155]

Pick s laws also describe diffusion in solid phases. In solids transport properties can be considerably different than in liquid phases. Only one component can mobile diffuse in the matrix of the second component. At higher temperatures the diffusion coefficient can be more similar in size than in liquid phases, but the diffusion coefficient at room temperature can be orders of magnitudes smaller, e.g., D < 10 ° cm s k To overcome the time limitation one must make the diffusion length smaller. Ultra-thin layers or nanoparticles provide such small dimensions. Under such conditions the diffusion is not semi-infinite but has a restricted extension. This has to be considered in the boundary conditions. [Pg.157]

The dimensionless coefficient, accounts for the change in the hydrodynamic friction between the fluid and the particles (created by the hydrodynamic interactions between the particles). The dimensionless surface mobility coefficient, takes into account the variation of the friction of a molecule in the adsorption layer. The diffusion problem, Eqs. (4) and (5), is connected with the hydrodynamic problem, Eqs. (1) and (2), through the boundary conditions at the material interface. [Pg.6]

The surface characteristics of a microfluidic channel are very important in determining the flow in electrokinetically driven systems. In electrokinetically driven systems, the bulk flow is created by movement of the mobile diffuse layer near the channel wall/solution interface that is termed electroosmotic flow (EOF). The EOF is dependent on the surface of the microchannel walls. Roberts et al. demonstrated the generation of EOF on laser-ablated polymer substrates for the first time, using the parallel processing mode with a photomask and an ArF excimer laser at 193 nm [17]. A variety of polymer substrates such as polystyrene, polycarbonate, cellulose acetate, and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) were ablated to fabricate microfluidic channels. The laser ablation process alters the surface chemistry of the machined regions and produced negatively charged. [Pg.1590]

Electro-osmosis is an important process in capillary electrophoresis. When the separation capillary is filled with a working electrolyte, an electric double layer is always formed on the inner wall surface due to ionizable groups of the capillary wall material and/or ions absorbed on to the capillary wall. For example, in quartz capillaries, the silanol groups present at the surface form the fixed negative part of the electric double layer. The positive part is then formed by ions present in the solution. A fraction of the ions forming the electrolyte part of the electric double layer is always fixed by electrostatic forces near the capillary wall and forms the so-called Stern layer the rest of these ions form, however, the mobile diffuse layer. The potential this creates between the Stern layer and the bulk solution is termed the zeta potential (in V), and is given by... [Pg.507]

Needless to say MEA is the core compartment of DMFC with its electrochemical reaction function. Figure 13.3 shows the typical microstructure of MEA, danon-strating the interface of catalyst and membrane. Its function is to deliver materials, such as catalyst and membrane, and physical functions for fuel delivery and recovery. Mobile application MEAs minor functions, such as fuel delivery and recovery, have become more important. MEA can be defined as three compartments of membrane, a catalyst layer and diffusion electrode with a microporous layer. The catalyst layer consists of catalyst and interface materials with membrane. This layer has to be designed for effective utilization of the catalyst in order to minimize the use of precious metals while maintaining the produced proton path to the membrane. For this reason, this layer has to be electron- and ion-conductive with low fuel flow resistance. The membrane is located at the center of the MEA, with the catalyst layer coated (catalyst-coated membrane, CCM) in some cases. Its ion conduction would be made a lot easier by reducing the impedance at the interface with the catalyst. [Pg.311]

SOLID SURFACES AND DISPERSIONS Diffuse layer (mobile)... [Pg.336]

It is known that even condensed films must have surface diffusional mobility Rideal and Tadayon [64] found that stearic acid films transferred from one surface to another by a process that seemed to involve surface diffusion to the occasional points of contact between the solids. Such transfer, of course, is observed in actual friction experiments in that an uncoated rider quickly acquires a layer of boundary lubricant from the surface over which it is passed [46]. However, there is little quantitative information available about actual surface diffusion coefficients. One value that may be relevant is that of Ross and Good [65] for butane on Spheron 6, which, for a monolayer, was about 5 x 10 cm /sec. If the average junction is about 10 cm in size, this would also be about the average distance that a film molecule would have to migrate, and the time required would be about 10 sec. This rate of Junctions passing each other corresponds to a sliding speed of 100 cm/sec so that the usual speeds of 0.01 cm/sec should not be too fast for pressurized film formation. See Ref. 62 for a study of another mechanism for surface mobility, that of evaporative hopping. [Pg.450]

Surface active electrolytes produce charged micelles whose effective charge can be measured by electrophoretic mobility [117,156]. The net charge is lower than the degree of aggregation, however, since some of the counterions remain associated with the micelle, presumably as part of a Stem layer (see Section V-3) [157]. Combination of self-diffusion with electrophoretic mobility measurements indicates that a typical micelle of a univalent surfactant contains about 1(X) monomer units and carries a net charge of 50-70. Additional colloidal characterization techniques are applicable to micelles such as ultrafiltration [158]. [Pg.481]

The vacancy is very mobile in many semiconductors. In Si, its activation energy for diffusion ranges from 0.18 to 0.45 eV depending on its charge state, that is, on the position of the Fenni level. Wlrile the equilibrium concentration of vacancies is rather low, many processing steps inject vacancies into the bulk ion implantation, electron irradiation, etching, the deposition of some thin films on the surface, such as Al contacts or nitride layers etc. Such non-equilibrium situations can greatly affect the mobility of impurities as vacancies flood the sample and trap interstitials. [Pg.2888]

For a fluid, with no underlying regular structure, the mecin squared displacement gradually increases with time (Figure 6.9). For a solid, however, the mean squared displacement typically oscillates about a mean value. Flowever, if there is diffusion within a solid then tliis can be detected from the mean squared displacement and may be restricted to fewer than three dimensions. For example. Figure 6.10 shows the mean squared displacement calculated for Li+ ions in Li3N at 400 K [Wolf et al. 1984]. This material contains layers of LiiN mobility of the Li" " ions is much greater within these planes than perpendicular to them. [Pg.337]


See other pages where Layer mobile-diffuse is mentioned: [Pg.89]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.928]    [Pg.3106]    [Pg.3514]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.627]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.582]    [Pg.978]    [Pg.1914]    [Pg.2200]    [Pg.627]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.588]    [Pg.652]    [Pg.2414]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.490]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.19 ]




SEARCH



Diffuse layer

Diffusion layer

Mobile diffusion

© 2024 chempedia.info