Laser Velocimetry Technique

The above remarks point out the interest of direct measurements of the boundary condition (BC) for the fluid velocity at a fluid solid interface. To obtain reliable information on the flow velocity BC of a fluid, with a spatial resolution from the wall down to molecular sizes, is a particularly difficult challenge. Conventional velocimetry techniques (even laser velocimetry) are far from such a resolution. We have developed a near field laser velocimetry technique which allows to increase significantly the spatial resolution compared to more conventional velocimetry techniques. This technique has been used to characterize the friction between a polymer melt and a solid wall and to understand how surface modifications weakening the interactions between a solid and a given simple fluid affected the fluid -- wall friction. 

Principle of the Near Field Laser Velocimetry technique... 

See also Planar cavity surface-emitting laser (PCSEL) diodes Vertical cavity surface-emitting laser (VCSEL) diodes compound semiconductor-based, 22 179 Laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV), 11 784 Laser Doppler velocimeters, 11 675 Laser-drilled surgical needles, 24 206 Laser dye energy levels, 14 702-703 Laser fabrication techniques, titanium, 24 857... 

Many laser-based droplet diagnostic techniques have evolved from the fields such as spray combustion and spray drying. Phase-Doppler particle analyzer is now recognized as the most successful and advanced diagnostic instrument for spray characterization. Other proven diagnostic techniques include laser velocimetry and... 

A significant advantage of the technique is that the equipment requirements are relatively modest and share a strong commonality with equipment and data analysife required for correlation or spectral density measurements, and laser velocimetry. 

Local measurements by using laser velocimetry, marking the flowing polymer or by optical techniques [12]. 

It thus appears necessary to perform experimental studies to zmalyze and elucidate the physics of this type of flow. The experimental conditions must therefore be carefully controlled to avoid introducing further difficulties that would make interpretation of the results even more complicated. Hence it must be possible to cheu-acterize the fluids by their specific properties (rheometry, molecular characteristics, etc.). The experimental techniques (visualization, laser velocimetry, etc.) must also be varied or adapted so as to break free of technological limitations and widen the field of investigation as much as p>ossible. Lastly, a minimum of care must be taken when interpreting the experimental results, in order to provide consistent interpretations of the phenomena observed and the mechanisms involved in their appearance and evolution. 

Laser-scattering techniques have been used in a variety of operational modes to size pharmaceutical aerosols. These may be listed as forward scattering, Fraunhofer diffraction, and laser Doppler velocimetry, in conjunction with either accelerating nozzles or acoustic excitation. 

Comparisons between velocity and turbulence results measured using the LDV (Laser Doppler Velocimetry) technique and CFD modeling were done. The predicted velocity components agreed well with the values obtained from LDV. The standard k-e model underpredicts the k level in the flotation cell compared to measured values. 

Other measurements of Hanratty s p have been made or inferred from various techniques, including a hot film probe just under the water surface (Brumley and Jirka, 1987), particle image velocimetry in a vertical laser sheet leading up to the water surface with a florescent dye to indicate water surface location accurately (Law and Khoo, 2002) and PIV on the water surface (McKenna and McGillis, 2004 Orlins and Gulliver, 2002). The measurements of Law and Khoo (2002) are especially interesting because the following relationship was developed from experiments on both a jet-stirred tank and a wind-wave channel ... 

Examples are Laser Differential Microanemometry (LMA) and Total Reflection Microscopy (TMA) (8). Both LMA and TMA measure the velocity profile of the fluid in tube flow. However, such optical techniques are generally not suitable for opaque and/or heterogeneous substances such as foods. Acoustic velocimetry seems to be more promising for determining the velocity profiles of opaque substances. Such an acoustic technique has been applied by Brunn et al (19) as an on-line viscometer for flow of mayonnaises in pipes. 

The methods described in this book are primarily concerned with the measurement of the microstructure of complex fluids subject to the application of external, orienting fields. In the case of flow, it is also of interest to measure the kinematics of the fluid motion. This chapter describes two experimental techniques that can be used for this purpose laser Doppler velocimetry for the measurement of fluid velocities, and dynamic light scattering (or photon correlation spectroscopy) for the determination of velocity gradients. 

Laser Doppler velocimetry is a powerful technique for the in situ measurement of fluid velocities. The basic optical configuration for the measurement is shown in Figure 6.1. The velocity measurement is made at the intersection of two laser beams that are focused to a point in the flow. The use of laser radiation is essential since the light must be monochromatic and coherent. This is required since the intersection of the two beams must create an interference pattern within the fluid. Such a pattern is shown in Figure 6.2, where two plane waves intersect at an angle 2(J). The two waves will have the following form [55] ... 

Unambiguous determination of the conditions under which slippage occurs requires a technique able to measure the velocity of the fluid in the immediate vicinity of the solid wall over a thickness comparable to the size of a polymer chain, i.e. a few tens of nanometers. Classical laser Doppler velocimetry does not meet this requirement even if it allows for the determination of velocity profiles which clearly reveal a non-zero velocity within typically a few 10 pm from the wall. We have developed a new optical technique. Near Field Velocimetry (N.F.V.) [14], which combines Evanescent Wave Induced Fluorescence (E.WF.) [27] and Fringe Pattern Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (F.P.F.R.A.P.) [28]. The former technique gives the spatial resolution normal to the solid wall, while the latter one enables the determination of the local velocity of the fluid. A major constraint of the technique is that it needs polymer molecules labelled with an easily photobleachable fluorescent probe. 

---