Large Eddy Simulation LES

The ability to resolve the dissipation structures allows a more detailed understanding of the interactions between turbulent flows and flame chemistry. This information on spectra, length scales, and the structure of small-scale turbulence in flames is also relevant to computational combustion models. For example, information on the locally measured values of the Batchelor scale and the dissipation-layer thickness can be used to design grids for large-eddy simulation (LES) or evaluate the relative resolution of LES resulfs. There is also the potential to use high-resolution dissipation measurements to evaluate subgrid-scale models for LES. 

An approximation of the flow field by a large eddy simulation (LES) formulation of the measured large eddies gives a reasonable estimation of the dissipation rate [7]. 

First of all, the increased computer power makes it possible to switch to transient simulations and to increase spatial resolution. One no longer has to be content with steady flow simulations on relatively coarse grids comprising 104-105 nodes. Full-scale Large Eddy Simulations (LES) on fine grids of 106—107 nodes currently belong to the possibilities and deliver realistic reproductions of transient flow and transport phenomena. Comparisons with quantitative experimental data have increased the confidence in LES. The present review stresses that this does not only apply to the hydrodynamics but relates to the physical operations and chemical processes carried out in stirred vessels as well. Examples of LES-based simulations of such operations and processes are due to Flollander et al. (2001a,b, 2003), Venneker et al. (2002), Van Vliet et al. (2005, 2006), and Flartmann et al. (2006). 

Chapter 3 will be employed. Thus, in lieu of (x, t), only the mixture-fraction means ( ) and covariances ( , F) (/, j e 1,..., Nm() will be available. Given this information, we would then like to compute the reacting-scalar means and covariances (require additional information about the mixture-fraction PDF. A similar problem arises when a large-eddy simulation (LES) of the mixture-fraction vector is employed. In this case, the resolved-scale mixture-fraction vector (x, t) is known, but the sub-grid-scale (SGS) fluctuations are not resolved. Instead, a transport equation for the SGS mixture-fraction covariance can be solved, but information about the SGS mixture-fraction PDF is still required to compute the resolved-scale reacting-scalar fields. 

The most widely adopted method for the turbulent flow analysis is based on time-averaged equations using the Reynolds decomposition concept. In the following, we discuss the Reynolds decomposition and time-averaging method. There are other methods such as direct numerical simulation (DNS), large-eddy simulation (LES), and discrete-vortex simulation (DVS) that are being developed and are not included here. 

The three main numerical approaches used in turbulence combustion modeling are Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) where all turbulent scales are modeled, direct numerical simulations (DNS) where all scales are resolved and large eddy simulations (LES) where larger scales are explicitly computed whereas the effects of smaller ones are modeled ... 

To simulate turbulent flows, Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations form the basis for most codes. Several turbulence models are usually provided. A new turbulence model may also usually be incorporated via user-defined routines. Recently, many of the commercial CFD codes have announced the inclusion of large eddy simulation (LES) capabilities. Considering the importance of rotating equipment used in reactor engineering applications, the ability to handle multiple reference frames or sliding meshes is important. Most leading commercial CFD codes provide... 

---