Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Labeling random fractional

To support this hypothesis, the OBC sample can be fractionated by the TREF experiment. TREF fractionation of the OBC, followed by evaluation of the octene content by 13C NMR, reveals the data shown in Fig. 21. For a polymer blend, each molecule dissolves and elutes according to its comonomer content. The results invariably fall on the line in Fig. 21 labeled random copolymer line. The triangles reveal the comonomer content of the TREF fractions from an OBC. At any given temperature, the polymer eluting has much more comonomer than would be expected for a random distribution. The only explanation is that the comonomer is blocked, as expected from the chain shuttling mechanism. The extent of deviation can even be quantified, and a new method was recently invented to determine the block index for a given polyolefin [46],... [Pg.95]

Internal Dynamics of Human Ubiquitin Revealed by i3C-Relaxation Studies of Randomly Fractionally Labeled Protein... [Pg.715]

To support this hypothesis, the OBC sample can be fractionated by a TREF experiment. Preparative TREF fractionation of the OBC, followed by evaluation of the comonomer content by C NMR, reveals the data shown in Figure 29. For traditional RCPs produced with the same comonomer type, a distinct relationship between the elution temperature and comonomer content is observed, indicating that regardless of the catalyst nature, the fractions from these RCPs have a statistically random distribution of comonomer. Historically, Wild has demonstrated that the peak elution temperature direaly relates to the degree of SCB in a copolymer. Thus, according to this behavior, each molecule present in a polymer blend will dissolve and elute according to its comonomer content. The results are expected to follow a calibration line in which TREF behavior can be predicted, which is labeled Random copolymer line in Figure 29. [Pg.728]

Fig. 3. Schematic diagram for the variation with concentration of the partial molar heat of solution of the liquid noble metals into liquid tin, taken from reference 51. The numbers are the experimental and calculated AHt for the solutes, in cal/g atom, at the two concentrations of 0 and 0.02 mole fraction. Q-C labels the curves calculated by the quasichemical theory in first order B-W labels the curves calculated by the Bragg-Williams, or zeroth-order approximation, which assumes a random... Fig. 3. Schematic diagram for the variation with concentration of the partial molar heat of solution of the liquid noble metals into liquid tin, taken from reference 51. The numbers are the experimental and calculated AHt for the solutes, in cal/g atom, at the two concentrations of 0 and 0.02 mole fraction. Q-C labels the curves calculated by the quasichemical theory in first order B-W labels the curves calculated by the Bragg-Williams, or zeroth-order approximation, which assumes a random...
Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of the spot photobleaching method of FRAP. (A) Darkened circles represent fluorescently labeled molecules evenly distributed over a two-dimensional surface (assumed to be an infinite plane). (B) White and light gray circles represent the initial postbleach distribution of photobleached molecules within a 1-pm diameter spot. (C) Redistribution of photobleached and unbleached molecules as a consequence of random diffusion over time. (D) Curve representing the fluorescence intensity within the l-pm diameter spot monitored over time arrows a, b, and c indicate the time-points that correspond to their respective panels. The rate of recovery from point b to point c is used to determine the diffusion constant. The magnitude of the recovery is determined by comparing the fluorescence intensity at point c with the initial intensity at point a, and is used to determine the mobile fraction. Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of the spot photobleaching method of FRAP. (A) Darkened circles represent fluorescently labeled molecules evenly distributed over a two-dimensional surface (assumed to be an infinite plane). (B) White and light gray circles represent the initial postbleach distribution of photobleached molecules within a 1-pm diameter spot. (C) Redistribution of photobleached and unbleached molecules as a consequence of random diffusion over time. (D) Curve representing the fluorescence intensity within the l-pm diameter spot monitored over time arrows a, b, and c indicate the time-points that correspond to their respective panels. The rate of recovery from point b to point c is used to determine the diffusion constant. The magnitude of the recovery is determined by comparing the fluorescence intensity at point c with the initial intensity at point a, and is used to determine the mobile fraction.
Fig. 4.12. Principle of the dideoxynucleotide chain-termination procedure. Primer ( ) is annealed to the single-stranded template at a site adjacent to the cloned sequence. Chain extension in the presence of the competing dideoxynucleotide results in the random incorporation of that nucleotide at the appropriate sites in the extended product. The mixture of labelled chain-terminated products are fractionated according to size by electrophoresis on a denaturing acrylamide gel and the ladder of products revealed by autoradiography. Fig. 4.12. Principle of the dideoxynucleotide chain-termination procedure. Primer ( ) is annealed to the single-stranded template at a site adjacent to the cloned sequence. Chain extension in the presence of the competing dideoxynucleotide results in the random incorporation of that nucleotide at the appropriate sites in the extended product. The mixture of labelled chain-terminated products are fractionated according to size by electrophoresis on a denaturing acrylamide gel and the ladder of products revealed by autoradiography.
Under these conditions the octanucleotide linker fragments chromatograph at a similar rate to nucleoside triphosphates. There is usually sufficient of the labelled triphosphate, used for the 3 -end labelling, remaining in the sample to act as a marker for the linker peak which elutes later. The first fractions are enriched in the longer DNA fragments—which tend to clone with lower efficiency—and this crude fractionation decreases the number of random plaques which have to be picked to obtain cloned representatives of all the fragments. [Pg.174]

Much interest has been shown in the biosynthesis of insect juvenile hormones (62 R1, R2 = Me or Et). In adult male moths, [l-14C]propionate was specifically incorporated into juvenile hormone I [JH-1, (62 R1 = R2 = Et)], and tracer was only found at, and equally distributed between, C-7 and C-ll.90 Application of [2-14C]-and [3-14C]-propionate led to extensive randomization of label, which suggests that C-2 and C-3 formed in propionate catabolism can be re-used as smaller fragments, whilst C-l is either removed from propionate in a metabolically active form or is highly diluted. Ternary complexes of brain, corpora cardiaca, and corpora allata from the tobacco budworm Heliothis virescens produced labelled JH-I and JH-II (62 R1 = Et, R2 = Me) when incubated with L-[Me-14C]methionine or sodium [l-l4C]propionate.91 Partial degradation of the juvenile hormones showed that in JH-I portions a and /3 (62) had incorporated one atom of tracer from each propionate, whereas fraction y was unlabelled, and in JH-II only fraction a was... [Pg.186]

The main limitation of the technique is the problem of achieving radiochemical, as distinct from chemical, purification of the final labeled product. Purification of the irradiated sample is necessary to remove radiation-induced degradation products and labile tritium. Many of the degradation products are not only chemically similar to the parent compound, but also possess much higher specific activities. For complete purification it is necessary to use multistage processes, such as gas and column chromatography, countercurrent distribution, and fractional distillation. Distribution of isotope within a molecule is generally random and nonuniform however, in some circumstances useful specificity can be achieved.17... [Pg.140]

For the random walk in energy space, two histograms are recorded, //+ E) and H- E), which for sufficiently long simulations converge to steady-state distributions which satisfy H E) + H E) = H E) = W E)g E). For each energy level the fraction of random walkers which have label plus is then given by fiE) = H+(E)/H(E). The above-discussed boundary conditions dictate /(E ) = 0 and f E+) = 1. [Pg.603]

Fig. 11. Experimental ion fractions for random scattering direction for the Ag(l 10) (open dots) and Ag(lll) (full dots) surfaces. The lines labelled ion and neutral correspond to calculated Auger survival probabilities for two types of trajectories. Fig. 11. Experimental ion fractions for random scattering direction for the Ag(l 10) (open dots) and Ag(lll) (full dots) surfaces. The lines labelled ion and neutral correspond to calculated Auger survival probabilities for two types of trajectories.
The CAST was initiated by the NIH in 1987 to determine if suppression of ventricular ectopy with encainide, flecainide, or moricizine could decrease the incidence of death from arrhythmia in patients who had suffered an MI. Entrance criteria included documented MI between 6 days and 2 years prior to enrollment and six or more PVCs per hour without runs of ventricular tachycardia greater than 15 beats in length. Also, patients were required to have an ejection fraction of 55% or less if recruited within 90 days of MI or 40% or less if recruited 90 days or more after MI. Patients with an ejection fraction of less than 30% were randomized only to encainide or moricizine. Patients were randomized to receive drug therapy or placebo after demonstrating PVC suppression with one of the agents. The drug and dose were determined during an open-label dose-titration phase that preceded randomization. [Pg.341]


See other pages where Labeling random fractional is mentioned: [Pg.304]    [Pg.500]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.506]    [Pg.696]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.550]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.1873]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.2070]    [Pg.492]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.41]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.4 ]




SEARCH



Labeling fractional

© 2024 chempedia.info