Kinetic repulsions

The name steric or Pauli repulsion for AEPauli already suggests it is repulsive (positive, antibonding), in spite of the negative contribution AVPauli. The repulsive character is due to the strongly positive AT0 (see Figure 2). Steric repulsion is evidently a kinetic energy effect and may also be appropriately called kinetic repulsion. 

The first, most primitive, model is the infinite barrier model (IBM). Here the electronic motion is confined by a spherical potential hole with infinitely high barriers. Once the electronic wave functions (spherical Bessel functions) and eigenvalues are known, one can proceed and calculate the dynamic polarizability a co). From this quantity the collective excitations are determined in a straightforward manner (see below). The theoretical prediction [50], shown in Figure 1.2, matches the experimental data (indicated by dots) rather well from very small to mesoscopic particle sizes. The result obtained shows that the IBM, which models the kinetic repulsion of the occupied 4d-shell of atomic Xe, works surprisingly well. This repulsion causes an enhanced electronic density, leading to the blue-shift of the surface-plasmon line. 

When a molecule is isolated from external fields, the Hamiltonian contains only kinetic energy operators for all of the electrons and nuclei as well as temis that account for repulsion and attraction between all distinct pairs of like and unlike charges, respectively. In such a case, the Hamiltonian is constant in time. Wlien this condition is satisfied, the representation of the time-dependent wavefiinction as a superposition of Hamiltonian eigenfiinctions can be used to detemiine the time dependence of the expansion coefficients. If equation (Al.1.39) is substituted into the tune-dependent Sclirodinger equation... 

Note the stnicPiral similarity between equation (A1.6.72) and equation (Al.6.41). witii and E being replaced by and the BO Hamiltonians governing the quanPim mechanical evolution in electronic states a and b, respectively. These Hamiltonians consist of a nuclear kinetic energy part and a potential energy part which derives from nuclear-electron attraction and nuclear-nuclear repulsion, which differs in the two electronic states. 

In the previous section, non-equilibrium behaviour was discussed, which is observed for particles with a deep minimum in the particle interactions at contact. In this final section, some examples of equilibrium phase behaviour in concentrated colloidal suspensions will be presented. Here we are concerned with purely repulsive particles (hard or soft spheres), or with particles with attractions of moderate strength and range (colloid-polymer and colloid-colloid mixtures). Although we shall focus mainly on equilibrium aspects, a few comments will be made about the associated kinetics as well [69, 70]. 

Traditionally, for molecular systems, one proceeds by considering the electronic Hamiltonian which consists of the quantum mechanical operators for the kinetic energy of the electrons, their mutual Coulombic repulsions, and... 

We assume that the nuclei are so slow moving relative to electrons that we may regard them as fixed masses. This amounts to separation of the Schroedinger equation into two parts, one for nuclei and one for electrons. We then drop the nuclear kinetic energy operator, but we retain the intemuclear repulsion terms, which we know from the nuclear charges and the intemuclear distances. We retain all terms that involve electrons, including the potential energy terms due to attractive forces between nuclei and electrons and those due to repulsive forces... 

There is a very convenient way of writing the Hamiltonian operator for atomic and molecular systems. One simply writes a kinetic energy part — for each election and a Coulombic potential Z/r for each interparticle electrostatic interaction. In the Coulombic potential Z is the charge and r is the interparticle distance. The temi Z/r is also an operator signifying multiply by Z r . The sign is - - for repulsion and — for atPaction. 

The first three terms in Eq. (10-26), the election kinetic energy, the nucleus-election Coulombic attraction, and the repulsion term between charge distributions at points Ti and V2, are classical terms. All of the quantum effects are included in the exchange-correlation potential... 

Here, the first term is the kinetic energy of the electrons only. The second term is the attraction of electrons to nuclei. The third term is the repulsion between electrons. The repulsion between nuclei is added onto the energy at the end of the calculation. The motion of nuclei can be described by considering this entire formulation to be a potential energy surface on which nuclei move. 

H = (kinetic energy) + (kinetic energy+ (repulsion) + (repulsion)gg + (attraction... 

Alternatively, ions moving toward a quadrupole can gain sufficient kinetic energy in the z-direction by space-charge repulsion from following ions. 

Just as for an atom, the hamiltonian H for a diatomic or polyatomic molecule is the sum of the kinetic energy T, or its quantum mechanical equivalent, and the potential energy V, as in Equation (1.20). In a molecule the kinetic energy T consists of contributions and from the motions of the electrons and nuclei, respectively. The potential energy comprises two terms, and F , due to coulombic repulsions between the electrons and between the nuclei, respectively, and a third term Fg , due to attractive forces between the electrons and nuclei, giving... 

The electrostatic repulsive forces are a function of particle kinetic energy (/ T), ionic strength, zeta potential, and separation distance. The van der Waals attractive forces are a function of the Hamaker constant and separation distance. 

Models of a second type (Sec. IV) restrict themselves to a few very basic ingredients, e.g., the repulsion between oil and water and the orientation of the amphiphiles. They are less versatile than chain models and have to be specified in view of the particular problem one has in mind. On the other hand, they allow an efficient study of structures on intermediate length and time scales, while still establishing a connection with microscopic properties of the materials. Hence, they bridge between the microscopic approaches and the more phenomenological treatments which will be described below. Various microscopic models of this type have been constructed and used to study phase transitions in the bulk of amphiphihc systems, internal phase transitions in monolayers and bilayers, interfacial properties, and dynamical aspects such as the kinetics of phase separation between water and oil in the presence of amphiphiles. 

---