Kinetic modeling software

ESSENTIAL NUMERICAL SUPPORTS FOR KINETIC MODELING SOFTWARE LINEAR INTEGRATORS... 

Haario, H. ModEst, 6.1 Software for kinetic modeling ProfMath Helsinki, 2002. 

Note in Table 5.10 that many of the integrals are common to different kinetic models. This is specific to this reaction where all the stoichiometric coefficients are unity and the initial reaction mixture was equimolar. In other words, the change in the number of moles is the same for all components. Rather than determine the integrals analytically, they could have been determined numerically. Analytical integrals are simply more convenient if they can be obtained, especially if the model is to be fitted in a spreadsheet, rather than purpose-written software. The least squares fit varies the reaction rate constants to minimize the objective function ... 

Kinetics evaluation software generates the values of ka (rates of complex formation) and kd (rates of complex dissociation) by fitting the data to interaction models. In a sensorgram, if binding occurs as sample passes over a prepared sensor surface, the response increases and is registered upon equilibrium, a constant signal is reached. The signal decreases when the sample is replaced with buffer, since the bound molecules dissociate. 

CHEMThermo Automatic Comparison of Thermodynamic Data for Species in Detailed Chemical Kinetic Modeling, Simmie, J. M Rolland, S. and Ryder, E. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 37(6), 341-345, (2005). CHEMThermo analyses the differences between two thermodynamic databases in CHEMKIN format, calculates the specific heat (Cp), the enthalpy (IP), and the entropy CS °) of a species at any given temperature, and compares the values of Cp, II", S" at three different temperatures, for the species in common. Refer to the website http //www.nuigalway.ie/chem/c3/software.htm for more information. 

Recently, a number of very efficient and transportable software packages have become available for the solution of stiff differential equations involved in detailed chemical kinetic modeling (see, for example, Hindmarsh, 1980 Petzold, 1982 Caracatsios and Steward, 1985). Consequently, the actual solution of equations no longer limits the modeling process. Instead, the limiting factor today is the availability of reliable and fundamentally based chemical reaction mechanisms. 

By the direct coupling of thermodynamic and kinetic models in a single software package, where the kinetic model can call the thermodynamic calculation part as a subroutine for the calculation of critical input parameters. 

Using these methods, the elementary reaction steps that define a fuel s overall combustion can be compiled, generating an overall combustion mechanism. Combustion simulation software, like CHEMKIN, takes as input a fuel s combustion mechanism and other system parameters, along with a reactor model, and simulates a complex combustion environment (Fig. 4). For instance, one of CHEMKIN s applications can simulate the behavior of a flame in a given fuel, providing a wealth of information about flame speed, key intermediates, and dominant reactions. Computational fluid dynamics can be combined with detailed chemical kinetic models to also be able to simulate turbulent flames and macroscopic combustion environments. 

A kinetic model for H202/UV process was developed using ACUCHEM software (Yao et al., 1992). 

London, U.K.), and the data are plotted on an Eadie-Hofstee plot (see Fig. 22). It should be noted that, at times, nonlinear regression lines represent the data points on an Eadie-Hofstee plots very poorly because the data reflect the contribution from two kinetically distinct enzymes whereas the computer software attempts to fit all data to an equation appropriate for a single enzyme. A relatively high standard error associated with the estimate of Km suggests that the nonlinear regression did not fit the data very well, and it is possible that a two enzyme model or perhaps an atypical enzyme kinetics model needs to be selected. When Km values are estimated by extrapolating data beyond the concentration range... 

Another aspect of a very different nature also merits attention. For complex reaction schemes, it can be very cumbersome to write the appropriate set of differential equations and their translation into computer code. As an example, consider the task of coding the set of differential equations for the Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction (see Section 7.5.2.4). It is too easy to make mistakes and, more importantly, those mistakes can be difficult to detect. For any user-friendly software, it is imperative to have an automatic equation parser that compiles the conventionally written kinetic model into the correct computer code of the appropriate language [37-39],... 

The kinetic and deactivation models were fitted by non-linear regression analysis against the experimental data using the Modest software, especially designed for the various tasks -simulations, parameter estimation, sensitivity analysis, optimal design of experiments, performance optimization - encountered in mathematical modelling [6], The main interest was to describe the epoxide conversion. The kinetic model could explain the data as can be seen in Fig. 1 and 2, which represent the data sets obtained at 70 °C and 75°C, respectively. The model could also explain the data for hydrogenated alkyltetrahydroanthraquinone. 

Warner [176] has given a comprehensive discussion of the principal approaches to the solution of stiff differential equations, including a hundred references among the most pertinent books, papers and application packages directed at simulating kinetic models. Emphasis has been put not only on numerical and software problems such as robustness, improving the linear equation solvers, using sparse matrix techniques, etc., but also on the availability of a chemical compiler, i.e. a powerful interface between kineticist and computer. 

One major advantage of the PMod software is the graphical interface that allows the interactive configuration of the kinetic model by the user as well as the application of some preprocessing steps, e g. setting up initial values and limits for the fit parameters. Visual evaluation of each plot is performed to check the quality of each fit. Each model curve is compared with the corresponding time-activity curve and the total X2 difference was used as the cost function, where the criterion was to minimise the summed squares (X2) of the differences between the measured and the model curve. The distribution at each individual point is taken to be Gaussian, with a standard deviation to be specified. The model parameters are usually accepted when kl-k4 is less than one and the vb value exceeds zero. The unit for the rate constants kl-k4 is 1/min, while vb reflects the fraction of blood within the evaluated volume. 

DNA to the other end can be monitored by the formation of the PTZ + with a peak at around 520 nm (Fig. 1) [23-25, 40-44] during the laser flash photolysis measurement. The rate constants of each individual charge transfer steps between G-C base-pairs (Tht) were determined from kinetic modeling. Analysis of time profiles of formation of PTZ + via the multistep charge-transfer mechanism was performed with numerical analysis by using Matlab software [25]. 

There are two ways of arriving at values of coefficients. The conventional, old-fashioned, graphical procedure seeks plots that give straight lines and determines coefficient values from their slopes and intercepts. Examples have been seen in earlier chapters. Instead, linear- or nonlinear-regression computer software can be used for "optimization," that is, finding the set of coefficient values that fits the experimental data with least error [11-15]. Both methods have their pros and cons, and each has its place in kinetic modeling. 

The URR is an easy calculation and thus is frequently used to measure the delivered dialysis dose. However, the URR does not account for the contribution of convective removal of urea. The Kt/V is the dialyzer clearance of urea K) in L/h multiplied by the duration of dialysis (/) in hours, divided by the urea distribution volume of the patient (V) in liters. Kt/Vi a unitless parameter that quantitates the fraction of the patient s total body water that is cleared of urea during a dialysis session. Urea kinetic modeling, using special computer software, is the optimal means to determine the Kt/V. Kt/V can also be calculated by using the following equation. ... 

We have developed a software package, RMG, for exactly this purpose. The software is designed to take the hierarchical database trees as its main input, and to return a kinetic model as its main output. This kinetic model can be in the conventional List-of-Reactions format suitable for use in CHEMKIN or other integrators, or, if desired, the RMG program package can perform the integration itself and return product yield/selectivity profiles. 

---