Kinetic-diffusion approximation

The kinetic-diffusion approximation predicts an attachment coefficient similar to the hybrid theory for all CMDs and for both Og m 2 and 3 (Figs. 3 and 4). The advantage of this theory is that the average attachment coefficient can be calculated from an analytical solution numerical techniques are not required. 

Unattached fractions of RaA (at t = °°) for two mine aerosols and for a typical room aerosol are shown in Table III. It is usually assumed that the attachment of radon progeny to aerosols of CMD < 0.1 ym follows the kinetic theory. In Table III it is apparent that the hybrid and kinetic theories predict similar unattached fractions for monodisperse aerosols. However, for more polydisperse aerosols, the kinetic theory predicts lower unattached fractions than the diffusion theory and thus the diffusion theory is the more appropriate theory to use. It is also evident that the kinetic-diffusion approximation predicts unattached fractions similar to those predicted by the hybrid theory in all cases. 

The variation of attachment coefficient with Og for CMD =0.2 ym and 0.3 ym is shown in Figures 6 and 7. Again it is apparent that the kinetic theory or diffusion theory are correct only at certain CMD and og. Neither is applicable under all circumstances. It is also evident that the kinetic-diffusion theory is a good approximation to the hybrid theory under all circumstances. 

Up to now we have been considering defect diffusion in continuous approximation, despite the fact that crystalline lattice discreteness was explicitly taken into account defining the initial distribution for geminate pairs. Note, however, that such continuous diffusion approximation is valid only asymptotically when defects (particles) before recombination made large number of hops (see Kotomin and Doktorov [50]). This condition could be violated for recombination of very close defects which can happen in several hops. The lattice statement of the annihilation kinetics has been discussed in detail by Schroder et al. [3, 4, 83], Dederichs and Deutz [34]. Let us consider here just the most important points of this problem. 

Fig. 4.15. A comparison of experimental delayed kinetics of an increase of tunnelling luminescence intensity after sudden change of their mobility (temperature increase from 175 to 180 K) in KC1 with theory [86], 1 - hopping kinetics for A = 2n> obtained by means of equation (4.4.1), 2 - experimental curve, 3 - results of continuous diffusion approximation...

The simplest mechanisms leading to the dispersion (spreading) of a zone s molecules can be described by the classical random-walk model [9], as noted in Section 5.3. However this model does not fully account for the complexities of migration. It gives, instead, a simple approximation which inherits the most essential and important properties (foremost of all the randomness) of the real migration process. The random-walk model has been used in a similar first-approximation role in many fields (chemical kinetics, diffusion, polymer chain configuration, etc.) and is thus important in its own right. 

With 30-70 wt% PVC, the kinetic curves show an initial sharp decrease followed by a slow component that satisfactorily obeys a second-order rate law (Fig. 13.6). Levin et al. proposed that the initial change in the absorption corresponds to the in-cage combination of the radicals pairs, while the slow component represents the combination of the radicals that have diffused into the (polymer) bulk. Interestingly, at >70 wt% PVC, only the fast in-cage combination of the geminate radical pairs can be observed. From the relative amplitudes of the fast and slow components of the kinetic curves, approximated values for the cage factor Fcab were calculated. Fcab increase from zero in films with <30 wt% PVC to near unity (>0.95) in films with >70 wt % PVC. 

Allan, R.B. and Wilkinson, RC. (1978). A visual analysis of chemotactic and chem-kinetic locomotion of human neutrophil leucocytes. Exp. Cell Res. Ill, 191-203. Alt, W. (1980). Biased random walk models for chemotaxis and related diffusion approximations, y. Math. Biol. 9, 147-177. 

The reaction kinetics approximation is mechanistically correct for systems where the reaction step at pore surfaces or other fluid-solid interfaces is controlling. This may occur in the case of chemisorption on porous catalysts and in affinity adsorbents that involve veiy slow binding steps. In these cases, the mass-transfer parameter k is replaced by a second-order reaction rate constant k. The driving force is written for a constant separation fac tor isotherm (column 4 in Table 16-12). When diffusion steps control the process, it is still possible to describe the system hy its apparent second-order kinetic behavior, since it usually provides a good approximation to a more complex exact form for single transition systems (see Fixed Bed Transitions ). 

Asymptotic Solution Rate equations for the various mass-transfer mechanisms are written in dimensionless form in Table 16-13 in terms of a number of transfer units, N = L/HTU, for particle-scale mass-transfer resistances, a number of reaction units for the reaction kinetics mechanism, and a number of dispersion units, Np, for axial dispersion. For pore and sohd diffusion, q = / // p is a dimensionless radial coordinate, where / p is the radius of the particle, if a particle is bidisperse, then / p can be replaced by the radius of a suoparticle. For prehminary calculations. Fig. 16-13 can be used to estimate N for use with the LDF approximation when more than one resistance is important. 

Figure 16-27 compares the various constant pattern solutions for R = 0.5. The curves are of a similar shape. The solution for reaction kinetics is perfectly symmetrical. The cui ves for the axial dispersion fluid-phase concentration profile and the linear driving force approximation are identical except that the latter occurs one transfer unit further down the bed. The cui ve for external mass transfer is exactly that for the linear driving force approximation turned upside down [i.e., rotated 180° about cf= nf = 0.5, N — Ti) = 0]. The hnear driving force approximation provides a good approximation for both pore diffusion and surface diffusion. 

FIG. 16-27 Constant pattern solutions for R = 0.5. Ordinant is cfor nfexcept for axial dispersion for which individual curves are labeled a, axial dispersion h, external mass transfer c, pore diffusion (spherical particles) d, surface diffusion (spherical particles) e, linear driving force approximation f, reaction kinetics. [from LeVan in Rodrigues et al. (eds.), Adsorption Science and Technology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dor drecht, The Nether lands, 1989 r eprinted with permission.]... 

The rectangular isotherm has received special attention. For this, many of the constant patterns are developed fuUy at the bed inlet, as shown for external mass transfer [Klotz, Chem. Rev.s., 39, 241 (1946)], pore diffusion [Vermeulen, Adv. Chem. Eng., 2, 147 (1958) Hall et al., Jnd. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 5, 212 (1966)], the linear driving force approximation [Cooper, Jnd. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 4, 308 (1965)], reaction kinetics [Hiester and Vermeulen, Chem. Eng. Progre.s.s, 48, 505 (1952) Bohart and Adams, J. Amei Chem. Soc., 42, 523 (1920)], and axial dispersion [Coppola and LeVan, Chem. Eng. ScL, 38, 991 (1983)]. 

It follows from this discussion that all of the transport properties can be derived in principle from the simple kinetic dreoty of gases, and their interrelationship tlu ough k and c leads one to expect that they are all characterized by a relatively small temperature coefficient. The simple theory suggests tlrat this should be a dependence on 7 /, but because of intermolecular forces, the experimental results usually indicate a larger temperature dependence even up to for the case of molecular inter-diffusion. The Anhenius equation which would involve an enthalpy of activation does not apply because no activated state is involved in the transport processes. If, however, the temperature dependence of these processes is fitted to such an expression as an algebraic approximation, tlren an activation enthalpy of a few kilojoules is observed. It will thus be found that when tire kinetics of a gas-solid or liquid reaction depends upon the transport properties of the gas phase, the apparent activation entlralpy will be a few kilojoules only (less than 50 kJ). 

A serious point is the neglect of surface tension and anisotropy in these derivations. In the experiments analyzed so far the relation VX const, seems to hold approximately, but what happens when the capillary anisotropy e goes to zero Numerically, tip-splitting occurs at lower velocities for smaller e. Most likely in a system with anisotropy e = 0 (and zero kinetic coefficient) the structures show seaweed patterns at velocities where the diffusion length is smaller than the short wavelength hmit of the neutral stability curve, as discussed in Sec. V B. 

But k must always be greater than or equal to k h / (A i + kf). That is, the reaction can go no faster than the rate at which E and S come together. Thus, k sets the upper limit for A ,. In other words, the catalytic effieiency of an enzyme cannot exceed the diffusion-eontroUed rate of combination of E and S to form ES. In HgO, the rate constant for such diffusion is approximately (P/M - sec. Those enzymes that are most efficient in their catalysis have A , ratios approaching this value. Their catalytic velocity is limited only by the rate at which they encounter S enzymes this efficient have achieved so-called catalytic perfection. All E and S encounters lead to reaction because such catalytically perfect enzymes can channel S to the active site, regardless of where S hits E. Table 14.5 lists the kinetic parameters of several enzymes in this category. Note that and A , both show a substantial range of variation in this table, even though their ratio falls around 10 /M sec. 

Mechanistically, in approximately neutral solutions, solid state diffusion is dominant. At higher or lower pH values, iron becomes increasingly soluble and the corrosion rate increases with the kinetics approaching linearity, ultimately being limited by the rate of diffusion of iron species through the pores in the oxide layer. In more concentrated solutions, e.g. pH values of less than 3 or greater than 12 (relative to 25°C) the oxide becomes detached from the metal and therefore unprotective . It may be noted that similar Arrhenius factors have been found at 75 C to those given by extrapolation of Potter and Mann s data from 300°C. 

---