Kinetic control effect

The composition of the products of reactions involving intermediates formed by metaHation depends on whether the measured composition results from kinetic control or from thermodynamic control. Thus the addition of diborane to 2-butene initially yields tri-j iAbutylboraneTri-j -butylborane. If heated and allowed to react further, this product isomerizes about 93% to the tributylborane, the product initially obtained from 1-butene (15). Similar effects are observed during hydroformylation reactions however, interpretation is more compHcated because the relative rates of isomerization and of carbonylation of the reaction intermediate depend on temperature and on hydrogen and carbon monoxide pressures (16). 

Let us consider cases 1-3 in Fig. 4.4. In case 1, AG s for formation of the competing transition states A and B from the reactant R are much less than AG s for formation of A and B from A and B, respectively. If the latter two AG s are sufficiently large that the competitively formed products B and A do not return to R, the ratio of the products A and B at the end of the reaction will not depend on their relative stabilities, but only on their relative rates of formation. The formation of A and B is effectively irreversible in these circumstances. The reaction energy plot in case 1 corresponds to this situation and represents a case of kinetic control. The relative amounts of products A and B will depend on the heights of the activation barriers AG and G, not the relative stability of products A and B. 

Structural effects on the rates of deprotonation of ketones have also been studied using veiy strong bases under conditions where complete conversion to the enolate occurs. In solvents such as THF or DME, bases such as lithium di-/-propylamide (LDA) and potassium hexamethyldisilylamide (KHMDS) give solutions of the enolates in relative proportions that reflect the relative rates of removal of the different protons in the carbonyl compound (kinetic control). The least hindered proton is removed most rapidly under these... 

Bromination has been shown not to exhibit a primary kinetic isotope effect in the case of benzene, bromobenzene, toluene, or methoxybenzene. There are several examples of substrates which do show significant isotope effects, including substituted anisoles, JV,iV-dimethylanilines, and 1,3,5-trialkylbenzenes. The observation of isotope effects in highly substituted systems seems to be the result of steric factors that can operate in two ways. There may be resistance to the bromine taking up a position coplanar with adjacent substituents in the aromatization step. This would favor return of the ff-complex to reactants. In addition, the steric bulk of several substituents may hinder solvent or other base from assisting in the proton removal. Either factor would allow deprotonation to become rate-controlling. 

In the absence of steric factors e.g. 5 ), the attack is antiparallel (A) (to the adjacent axial bond) and gives the axially substituted chair form (12). In the presence of steric hindrance to attack in the preferred fashion, approach is parallel (P), from the opposite side, and the true kinetic product is the axially substituted boat form (13). This normally undergoes an immediate conformational flip to the equatorial chair form (14) which is isolated as the kinetic product. The effect of such factors is exemplified in the behavior of 3-ketones. Thus, kinetically controlled bromination of 5a-cholestan-3-one (enol acetate) yields the 2a-epimer, (15), which is also the stable form. The presence of a 5a-substituent counteracts the steric effect of the 10-methyl group and results in the formation of the unstable 2l5-(axial)halo ketone... 

The preference for O-acylation of phenols fflises because these reactions ffle kinetically controlled. O-acylation is faster than C-acylation. The C-acyl isomers are more stable, however, and it is known that aluminum chloride is a very effective catalyst for the conversion of fflyl esters to fflyl ketones. This isomerization is called the Fries rearrangement. 

The effect of substitutents at the C3 and C6 positions of the azepine ring is much more dramatic in that they force the 1//-azepine into a competing [6 + 2] Tt-cydoaddilion at the Cl —Cl positions.6 1 In fact, at room temperature [6 + 2] cycloaddition by a kinetically controlled, non-concerted, ionic process appears to be dominant, since on treating a mixture of ethyl 3,6-dimethyl- and ethyl 2,5-dimethyl-l//-azepine-l-carboxylate with less than a molar equivalent of ethenetctracarbonitrile, only the [6 + 2] cycloadduct 10 of the 3,6-dimethyl-l//-azepine is formed. 

The presence of a large excess of lithium salt decreases the stereoselectivity when the reaction is performed under kinetic control. These results and those reported for deuteration (see Section D. 1.1.1.5.) show that this effect is only observed when electrophilic assistance of the lithium cation is involved. 

The value of the exponent a obtained in the above-mentioned experiments is in remarkable accord with predictions based on a consideration of excluded kinetic volume effects. Khokhlov51 proposed, that for a slow, chemically controlled, reaction between the ends of long chains a should be 0.16. The value of a was suggested to increase to 0,28 for chain end-mid chain reaction and to 0.43 for midchain-mid chain reaction. The latter provides one possible explanation for the greater exponent for higher acrylates (Table 5.11.32... 

Since the LUMO is n-antibonding, the kinetically controlled interaction of a donor molecule (HMPA) with the silicon leads to a decrease of multiple bonding between Cr and Si concomitant with a pyramidalization at the silicon atom. The resulting MSi bond distance and pyramidalization effect are strongly influenced by the respective substituents. 

Most of the chemical reactions presented in this book have been studied in homogeneous solutions. This chapter presents a conceptual and theoretical framework for these processes. Some of the matters involve principles, such as diffusion-controlled rates and applications of TST to questions of solvent effects on reactivity. Others have practical components as well, especially those dealing with salt effects and kinetic isotope effects. 

According to our initial hypothesis, these anomalous effects are the experimental results occurring under kinetic control of conformational relaxation. Here conformational relaxation is exposed over its entire length to the influence of the electrochemical variables, the temperature, the polymer-polymer interactions, the polymer-solvent interactions, etc. These are the monitors that can be used to validate each new step of theoretical development during our attempt to integrate electrochemistry and polymer science. 

From this it is possible to calculate the overall theoretical rate ratio for acetylation of m-xylene relative to benzene, since this is one-sixth the sum of the partial rate factors (in this case 1130), and the isomer distribution if the reaction is kinetically controlled. The overall rate ratio actually is 347 and the calculated and observed isomer distributions are listed in Table 11.2. In this case, and in many others, agreement is fairly good, but many cases are known where the effects are not additive. For example. 

In series with a constant enthalpy, controlled by entropy changes, steric effects (15), or more particularly, kinetic steric effects (13, 14) and solvent effects (14) may be decisive. 

Later work examined substituent effects on kinetically controlled alkylations [68, 69] (Scheme 32). Substitution at the 5-position is well tolerated in these reactions. Reductive lithiation of a series of 4-phenylthio-l,3-dioxanes and quenching of the axial alkyllithium intermediate with dimethyl sulfate provided the flzzfz -l,3-diols in good yield, with essentially complete selectivity. 

Kinetically controlled deprotonation of a,p-unsaturated ketones usually occurs preferentially at the a -carbon adjacent to the carbonyl group. The polar effect of the carbonyl group is probably responsible for the faster deprotonation at this position. 

The dialin donor solvents were also used directly in coal liquefaction studies. Inasmuch as details of coal structure are unknown, the present theory can only be tested in a qualitative way, as follows. First, if the liquefaction of coal occurs under kinetic control with hydrogen-transfer from the donor solvent involved in the rate-determining step, then we should expect the dialin donors to be more effective than the control solvent T.et-ralin (and also Dfecalin). This is suggested by the theory because the dialins possess higher energy HOMOs than Tetralin and... 

---