Inverse Lorentz Transformation

So far we have considered the Lorentz transformation A from IS to IS given by Eq. (3.12). Due to the group structure of Lorentz transformations the inverse transformation A will always exist and mediate the transition from IS back to IS, 

The trivial constant space-time shift a does not affect the determination of the inverse transformation and is therefore neglected in the following. Anticipating the discussion in section 3.1.4, it is further convenient to define the fully contravariant components of the metric to be identical to the fully covariant components g v as already introduced in Eq. (3.8), g = gfiv, and to note that the metric is both symmetric and its own inverse, 

The four-dimensional Kronecker s)mibol is a straightforward generalization of the corresponding three-dimensional s)mibol Sij as given by Eq. (2.11), where the indices have now been chosen as super- or subscripts in order to support Einstein s summation convention. 

After these preliminaries, multiplication of Eq. (3.17) with the metric g from the left immediately yields an equation for the inverse transformation, 

This allows us to compactly formulate matrix equations containing the inverse transformation like 

---

These transformations from the stationary to the moving frame are called the Lorentz transformations. The inverse Lorentz transformation is obtained by reversing the sign of v, so that... 

In contrast to the three-dimensional situation of nonrelativistic mechanics there are now two kinds of vectors within the four-dimensional Minkowski space. Contravariant vectors transform according to Eq. (3.36) whereas covariant vectors transform acoording to Eq. (3.38) by the transition from IS to IS. The reason for this crucial feature of Minkowski space is solely rooted in the structure of the metric g given by Eq. (3.8) which has been shown to be responsible for the central structure of Lorentz transformations as given by Eq. (3.17). As a consequence, the transposed Lorentz transformation A no longer represents the inverse transformation A . As we have seen, the inverse Lorentz transformation is now more involved and given by Eq. (3.25). 

Hence, under a proper homogeneous Lorentz transformation -without time inversion the quantity transforms like a scalar ... 

The vanishing of this matrix element is, in fact, independent of the assumption of current conservation, and can be proved using the transformation properties of the current operator and one-partic e states under space and time inversion, together with the hermiticity of jn(0). By actually generating the states q,<>, from the states in which the particle is at rest, by a Lorentz transformation along the 3 axis, and the use of the transformation properties of the current operator, essentially the entire kinematical structure of the matrix element of on q, can be obtained.15 We shall, however, not do so here. Bather, we note that the right-hand side of Eq. (11-529) implies that... 

Thus, the transfer function is the complex Lorentz function, and the linear response in the time domain is the inverse Fourier transform of K (w) (cf. Section 4.1),... 

The group of Poincare transformations consists of coordinate transformations (rotations, translations, proper Lorentz transformations...) linking the different inertial frames that are supposed to be equivalent for the description of nature. The free Dirac equation is invariant under these Poincare transformations. More precisely, the free Dirac equation is invariant under (the covering group of) the proper orthochronous Poincare group, which excludes the time reversal and the space-time inversion, but does include the parity transformation (space reflection). 

Lorentz transformations is also invariant under the combined operations of charge conjugation, C, space inversion, P, and time reversal, T, taken in any order. 

One of the central problems in the theory of P decay is the determination of the Hamilton operator of the weak interaction (O Eqs. (2.71) and O (2.72)). H should be invariant against proper Lorentz transformation, otherwise it would be possible to determine an absolute time, which is impossible according to the theory of relativity. Then, from Dirac s relativistic wave mechanics for spin 1/2 particles, it follows that there may be five classes of weak interaction terms, each transforming in a particular way under rotation and space inversion scalar (S), vector (V), antisymmetric tensor of second rank (T), axial vector (A), and pseudoscalar (P). As one cannot exclude any of these from the beginning, a linear combination of all five interactions must be considered ... 

Proper Lorentz transformations can always be continuously converted into the identical transformation given by A = 1 = id. Improper Lorentz transformations involve either space inversion (A q > 1, det A = —1) or time reversal (A g < — 1, det A = —1) or both. These improper transformations do not play any role in quantum chemistry and will thus not be considered in this presentation. 

In order to calculate the interaction energy of particles 1 and 2 we need to transform these potentials to the original frame of reference IS by the inverse Lorentz boost as given by Eqs. (3.81) and (3.82),... 

Comparing with (4.27), we see that we may identify ca with the velocity operator u. With this identification, we see that the velocity four-vector a can be identified with the classical velocity four-vector, which is the time derivative of the position four-vector w. We can also identify p with the inverse of the y factor arising in the Lorentz transformations. 

The right-hand side of this equation is a mere cosine function as shown in Figure 6.6d, and its Fourier transform gives a delta function as shown in Figure 6.6e. This means that in an ideal case the assumed true bandshape is recovered by the above series of computations. What is needed in a practical case is an operation to narrow the bandwidth of the Lorentz profile to an appropriate degree. In more general terms, FSD is an operation to narrow (deconvolve) the bandwidth of a band by computations involving the (inverse) Fourier transform of the bandshape function itself (FSD). 

If the structural entities are lamellae, Eq. (8.80) describes an ensemble of perfectly oriented but uncorrelated layers. Inversion of the Lorentz correction yields the scattering curve of the isotropic material I (5) = I (s) / (2ns2). On the other hand, a scattering pattern of highly oriented lamellae or cylinders is readily converted into the ID scattering intensity /, (53) by ID projection onto the fiber direction (p. 136, Eq. (8.56)). The model for the ID intensity, Eq. (8.80), has three parameters Ap, dc, and <7C. For the nonlinear regression it is important to transform to a parameter set with little parameter-parameter correlation Ap, dc, and oc/dc. When applied to raw scattering data, additionally the deviation of the real from the ideal two-phase system must be considered in an extended model function (cf. p. 124). 

In order to finally determine the desired transformation matrix A(v) for a general Lorentz boost, we note that we can always first rotate IS to IS" by application of A(K) as given by Eq. (3.19) such that the new coordinate axis x is parallel to v, then apply the familiar Lorentz boost A(t>) in -direction as given by Eq. (3.66), and finally rotate the new system IS " back to IS by the inverse rotation A(E ),... 

For the general case of an arbitrary Lorentz boost A( ) we note that the inverse transformation A(—i ) is easily obtained from Eq. (3.81) by switching the signs of the velocity components V (cf. Eq. (3.82)). The Minkowski force / in IS is therefore given by... 

---