Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interlocking adhesion

Mechanical interlocking is the dominant theory for coatings and adhesives on wood and porous materials. In these cases, it is worth trying to increase the surface roughness (or porosity) by chemical or mechanical surface treatment. However, it is under debate whether the roughness helps the adhesion due to the existoice of this interlocking adhesion mechanism (Bendey and... [Pg.143]

A needled felt, on the other hand, is a fabric composed of natural, synthetic, or a combination of natural and synthetic fibers physically interlocked by the action of a needle loom with or without combination of other textile fabrics and with or without suitable combination of mechanical work, chemical action, moisture, and heat, but without weaving, knitting, stitching, thermal bonding, or adhesives (16). [Pg.153]

An inversion of these arguments indicates that release agents should exhibit several of the following features (/) act as a barrier to mechanical interlocking (2) prevent interdiffusion (J) exhibit poor adsorption and lack of reaction with at least one material at the interface (4) have low surface tension, resulting in poor wettabihty, ie, negative spreading coefficient, of the release substrate by the adhesive (5) low thermodynamic work of adhesion ... [Pg.100]

Many of these features are interrelated. Finely divided soHds such as talc [14807-96-6] are excellent barriers to mechanical interlocking and interdiffusion. They also reduce the area of contact over which short-range intermolecular forces can interact. Because compatibiUty of different polymers is the exception rather than the rule, preformed sheets of a different polymer usually prevent interdiffusion and are an effective way of controlling adhesion, provided no new strong interfacial interactions are thereby introduced. Surface tension and thermodynamic work of adhesion are interrelated, as shown in equations 1, 2, and 3, and are a direct consequence of the intermolecular forces that also control adsorption and chemical reactivity. [Pg.100]

Procedures for testiug asphalt shingles resistant to wind blowup/blowoff when appHed on low slopes in accordance with manufacturer instmctions. Shingles are Type I, factory-appHed adhesive (self-sealing shingles) and Type II, lock-type, with mechanically interlocking tabs (ears). [Pg.215]

The above discussion has tacitly assumed that it is only molecular interactions which lead to adhesion, and these have been assumed to occur across relatively smooth interfaces between materials in intimate contact. As described in typical textbooks, however, there are a number of disparate mechanisms that may be responsible for adhesion [9-11,32]. The list includes (1) the adsorption mechanism (2) the diffusion mechanism (3) the mechanical interlocking mechanism and (4) the electrostatic mechanism. These are pictured schematically in Fig. 6 and described briefly below, because the various semi-empirical prediction schemes apply differently depending on which mechanisms are relevant in a given case. Any given real case often entails a combination of mechanisms. [Pg.11]

Fig. 6. Four mechanisms of adhesion, (a) The adsorption mechanism (contact adhesion), (b) The diffusion mechanism (diffusion interphase adhesion), (c) The mechanical interlocking mechanism. (d) The electrostatic mechanism. Fig. 6. Four mechanisms of adhesion, (a) The adsorption mechanism (contact adhesion), (b) The diffusion mechanism (diffusion interphase adhesion), (c) The mechanical interlocking mechanism. (d) The electrostatic mechanism.
Regardless of which, or which combination, of the above mechanisms is responsible for adhesion in a given case, intimate molecular contact between the adhesive and adherend is required. This means that the contact angle of the liquid adhesive against the adherend surface should be as low as possible, and preferably 0°. For the case of contact adhesion, this is immediately evident, but in cases where mechanical interlocking is the primary mechanism for adhesion it is also the case because the adhesive must first be able to flow or wick into the pores of the... [Pg.17]

In recent years there has been a renewed appreciation of potential beneficial effects of roughness on a macroscale. For example Morris and Shanahan worked with sintered steel substrates bonded with a polyurethane adhesive [61]. They observed much higher fracture energy for joints with sintered steel compared with those with fully dense steel, and ascribed this to the mechanical interlocking of polymer within the pores. Extra energy was required to extend and break these polymer fibrils. [Pg.335]

Chlorinated rubber is also used to promote the adhesion of solvent-borne CR adhesives to metals and plasticized PVC. Addition of a low molecular weight chlorinated rubber (containing about 65 wt% chlorine) improves the shear strength and creep resistance of polychloroprene adhesives [75] but a reduction in open time is also produced. A heat reactivation (process in which the surface of the adhesive film is raised to 90-100°C to destroy the crystallinity of the film and allowing diffusion to produce polymer chain interlocking more rapidly) restores tack to the polychloroprene adhesives. [Pg.664]

The surface preparation must enable and promote the formation of bonds across the adherend/primer-adhesive interface. These bonds may be chemical (covalent, acid-base, van der Waals, hydrogen, etc.), physical (mechanical interlocking), diffusional (not likely with adhesive bonding to metals), or some combination of these (Chapters 7-9). [Pg.947]

The scale of the microscopic surface roughness is important to assure good mechanical interlocking and good durability. Although all roughness serves to increase the effective surface area of the adherend and therefore to increase the number of primary and secondary bonds with the adhesive/primer, surfaces with features on the order of tens of nanometers exhibit superior performance to those with features on the order of microns [9,14], Several factors contribute to this difference in performance. The larger-scale features are fewer in number... [Pg.951]


See other pages where Interlocking adhesion is mentioned: [Pg.159]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.599]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.599]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.473]    [Pg.1984]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.695]    [Pg.786]    [Pg.951]    [Pg.952]    [Pg.957]    [Pg.964]    [Pg.967]    [Pg.972]    [Pg.975]    [Pg.982]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.101 ]




SEARCH



Adhesion mechanical interlocking

Adhesion mechanical interlocking theory

Adhesion mechanisms mechanical interlocking

Adhesive bond mechanical interlocking

Interlocking

Interlocks

© 2024 chempedia.info