Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interference detection

By their nature, many UV absorbers are amenable to analysis by fluorimetric analysis. In many instances visible fluorescence techniques are less subject to interference by other polymer additives in a polymer extract than are UV methods of analysis. In fluorescence analysis (ex at 367 nm, em at 400-440 nm) of a PS/Uvitex OB chloroform dissolution AOs such as Ionol CP, Ionox 330, Polygard and Wingstay T/W do not interfere detection limit of 10 ppm [41]. [Pg.322]

A number of industiy-accepted state-of-the-art 3D computer-aided design (CAD) systems have been used for this purpose. The specification-driven 3D-CAD system allows a computer model to be built to allow extraction of drawings from the model for fabrication and erection. The extracted drawings are enhanced in their accuracy by the computer interference detection system which greatly reduces field rework. [Pg.52]

The following section gives an overview of the different methods available to measure ozone in the gas and liquid phases. For quick reference the methods are summarized in Table 2-7 so that the reader can choose an analytical method that fits his or her system at a glance. All important information e. g. interference, detection limit, as well as the original reference with the detailed description of the method, necessary for its application can be found in this table. The methods are described in ascending order of their purchase costs. [Pg.68]

Takatera and Watanabe [41] used this technique for the speciation of iodide ion, I-, and five iodo amino acids (monoiodotyrosine (MIT), diiodotyrosine (DIT), 3,3,5-triiodothyromine (T3), 3,3,5 -triiodothyromine (rT3), and thyroxine (T4)) which are all found in thyroid hormones. The speciation of these compounds in clinical samples such as blood plasma and urine may assist in the identification of thyroid diseases. The RPLC-ICP-MS system was able to detect all of the I-containing compounds with no interferences. Detection limits were in the range 35-130 pg for the six compounds using a 50% methanol eluent. Detection limits were better for species eluted at a shorter retention time since the peak shapes were sharper. The detection limits calculated were an order of magnitude lower than for methods where UV absorbance detection was used. [Pg.1233]

Several matrix interference detection techniques enable laboratories to recognize their presence and reduce their negative effects on compound identification and quantitation. [Pg.238]

Laboratory QC data are classified as batch QC data and individual sample QC data. For all types of analysis, batch QC data originate from laboratory blanks, laboratory control samples, matrix spikes, and laboratory duplicates. Individual sample QC data in organic compound analysis are obtained from surrogate and internal standard recoveries. Matrix interference detection techniques (serial dilution tests, postdigestion spike additions, and MSA tests) are the source for individual sample QC checks in trace element analysis. (Chapter 4.4.4.5 addresses the trace element matrix interference detection techniques and the associated acceptance criteria.)... [Pg.253]

GC/MS methods are the only published methods that include the surrogate standard recovery limit guidance. Similar to LCS, acceptance criteria for surrogate standard recoveries of all other organic analysis methods are the laboratory control limits. The limits for internal standard recovery in GC/MS analysis are specified by the method and cannot be changed by the laboratory. Acceptance criteria for matrix interference detection techniques in trace element analyses, discussed in Chapter 4.4.4.5, are also specified in the analytical methods. [Pg.279]

Vermeer, H. J., E. Thomassen, and N. de Jonge. 2005. Automated processing of serum indices used for interference detection by the laboratory information system. Clinical Chemistry 51 244-247. [Pg.289]

The chapters in the book that deal with the methods of atomic spectroscopy discuss such things as the basic principles involved in the method, the instrumentation requirements, variations of instrumentation, advantages and disadvantages of the method, problems of interferences, detection limits, the collection and processing of the data, and possible applications. Since the book is intended to serve as a textbook, principles are stressed. Detailed methods of analysis for specific elements are not included. It is the hope of the author, however, that the presentation of basic information is sufficiently detailed so the students can develop their own methods of analysis as needed. [Pg.381]

Spectra generated by these instruments are comparatively simple because of the predominantly singly charged ions. Most of the naturally occurring elements have three or fewer isotopes and isotope overlap is minimal. There are no coincidences in mass below 40 (" °Ar, and and above this mass, only indium ( In and In) has no isotope free of isobaric interference. Detection limits are in the region of 50pgml. ... [Pg.2796]

Application Mode Limit of Detection Specified Interference Detection Chemistry Method... [Pg.240]

Recovery Time. Certain gas detection technologies require time to recover or clear after exposure to a target gas or interferent. Detection accuracy can be severely affected if a second gas leak occurs in the gas detector s monitoring area before it has recovered from the first gas leak. Thus, recovery time may influence the selection of a specific gas detection technology.b ]... [Pg.607]

They concluded that the presence of the calcium line at 309.528 nm in both spectra could obviously result in a small error. The authors also point out, considering the Zeeman-splitting in the range of 10-30 pm that the emission line of nickel partially coincides with the magnesium absorption line at 309.690 nm, and some overlap between the aluminum and magnesium absorption lines at 309.284 nm and 309.299 nm, respectively, occurred as well, resulting in the observed deviations. Although the authors did not use HR-CS AAS for the determination of aluminum in seawater, it is needless to say that the interferences detected for LS AAS with Zeeman-effect BC are absent in the former technique, so that an interference-free determination could be expected with an improved overall performance. [Pg.253]

Micro-aspect based design and interference detection are the two sides of the same coin The benefits depend on the capacity to validate the integrated mechanism, i.e. the composition of many micro-aspects. The interest of aspects for dependability is clearly depending on the validation capability we can propose regarding composition. This applied to micro-aspects, at one extreme of the spectrum, but also to the composition of macro-mechanisms. Beyond interferences, point cut definition is a complex issue. For mechanisms like replication, the point cut is often simple (service calls) and should anyway remain simple to convince safety experts. [Pg.55]


See other pages where Interference detection is mentioned: [Pg.83]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.5105]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.620]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.311]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.97 , Pg.98 ]




SEARCH



Below detection, limit chromatographic interference

Detectability interferences, LIFS

Interference pattern state detection

Laser detectability interferences

NADH detection interference

Quantum detect interference

© 2024 chempedia.info