Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Quantum detect interference

Quantum superposition does remain alive and well on the atomic scale. Christopher Monroe and co-workers in 1996 were able to prepare a single beryllium ion as a superposition of wavepackets representing two different electronic states spatially separated by as much as 80 nm. By an appropritate sequence of laser pulses, they were able to detect interference between the two wavepackets. Inevitably, this experiment has been referred to as Schrodinger s cation. ... [Pg.305]

Mossbauer resonance of Zn to study the influence of the gravitational field on electromagnetic radiation. A Ga ZnO source (4.2 K) was used at a distance of 1 m from an enriched ZnO absorber (4.2 K). A red shift of the photons by about 5% of the width of the resonance line was observed. The corresponding shift with Fe as Mossbauer isotope would be only 0.01%. The result is in accordance with Einstein s equivalence principle. Further gravitational red shift experiments using the 93.3 keV Mossbauer resonance of Zn were performed later employing a superconducting quantum interference device-based displacement sensor to detect the tiny Doppler motion of the source [66, 67]. [Pg.262]

CCD detector consists of 224 linear photodetector arrays on a silicon chip with a surface area of 13 x 18 mm (Fig. 4.16). The array segments detect three or four analytical lines of high analytical sensitivity and large dynamic range and which are free from spectral interferences. Each subarray is comprised of pixels. The pixels are photosensitive areas of silicon and are positioned on the detector atx -y locations that correspond to the locations of the desired emission lines generated by an echelle spectrometer. The emission lines are detected by means of their location on the chip and more than one line may be measured simultaneously. The detector can then be electronically wiped clean and the next sample analysed. The advantages of such detectors are that they make available as many as ten lines per element, so lines which suffer from interferences can be identified and eliminated from the analysis. Compared with many PMTs, a CCD detector offers an improvement in quantum efficiency and a lower dark current. [Pg.103]

The key is to calculate the physical quantum states as they reach DS-2. From preceding sections, the theory predicts that if sameness is there, an interference pattern will form and shall be detected. [Pg.73]

But now, the field quantum states are no longer orthogonal. An interference pattern can hence be detected. This result is quoted in Ref. [15]. [Pg.93]

Any quantum system can be associated to an I-frame thereby, internal and "external" (I-frame) quantum states can be determined or at least observed as done in astronomy. Probing (measuring) a quantum system breaks Hilbert space-time evolution thereby preparing a new quantum state. This latter can be used to detect the result due to probing. See Ref. [29] for an illustration. Gravitation is a prototype of classical effects. From neutron interference spectroscopy gravitation effects on quantum states are well documented. [Pg.102]

Solvated electrons do not inevitably interfere in photoinduced electron transfer. Their observations are often made under laser irradiations in order to detect these transients efficiently. Under these conditions processes may occur in a multistep and biphotonic way [68], the triplet state being one of the possible intermedites [69], The two photon process of electron ejection may dominate under pulsed laser conditions of high excitation energy while a monophotonic process prevails under continuous laser intensity conditions. These differences may explain the quantum yields observed for instance for the electron photoejection from excited phenolate in water under different irradiation conditions (0.23 [70], 0.17 [71], 0.37 [72]). When using conventional light sources, a relatively low yield of solvated electron is to be expected [69, 72]. [Pg.103]


See other pages where Quantum detect interference is mentioned: [Pg.175]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.694]    [Pg.663]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.2963]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.662]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.506]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.1100]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.639]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.27]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.226 , Pg.229 , Pg.230 , Pg.233 ]




SEARCH



Interferences detection

Quantum interference

© 2024 chempedia.info