Interference concentration profiles

Optical techniques, in particular interferometry, may be used to measure a nonzero concentration of the reactant at the electrode. However, such measurements are restricted to (a) dilute solutions, because refraction occurs in addition to interference (B4a), and (b) solutions in which only the concentration of the reacting species varies, that is, to solutions of a single salt. If the solution contains two electrolytes with dissimilar concentration profiles in the diffusion layer, then a second independent measurement is needed to establish the reactant concentration at the electrode. Interferometric methods are considered in detail by Muller (M14). 

If electron transport is fast, the system passes from zone R to zone S+R and then to zone SR. In the latter case there is a mutual compensation of diffusion and chemical reaction, making the substrate concentration profile decrease within a thin reaction layer adjacent to the film-solution interface. This situation is similar to what we have termed pure kinetic conditions in the analysis of an EC reaction scheme adjacent to the electrode solution interface developed in Section 2.2.1. From there, if electron transport starts to interfere, one passes from zone SR to zone SR+E and ultimately to zone E, where the response is controlled entirely by electron transport. 

Super or near-critical water is being studied to develop alternatives to environmentally hazardous organic solvents. Venardou et al. utilized Raman spectroscopy to monitor the hydrolysis of acetonitrile in near-critical water without a catalyst, and determined the rate constant, activation energy, impact of experimental parameters, and mechanism [119,120]. Widjaja et al. tracked the hydrolysis of acetic anhydride to form acetic acid in water and used BTEM to identify the pure components and their relative concentrations [121]. The advantage of this approach is that it does not use separate calibration experiments, but stiU enables identihcation of the reaction components, even minor, unknown species or interference signals, and generates relative concentration profiles. It may be possible to convert relative measurements into absolute concentrations with additional information. 

The electrolytic conductivity detector is a good alternative to the FPD for selective sulfur detection. The ELCD has a larger linear dynamic range and a linear response to concentration profile. The ELCD in most cases appears, under ideal conditions, to yield slightly lower detection limits for sulfur (about 1-2 pg S/sec), but with much less interference from hydrocar-... 

FIGURE 11.8 Effect of the hard-modeling constraint on a set of concentration profiles representing a protonation process in the presence of an interference (left profiles, unconstrained right profiles, constrained). Only the compounds involved in the protonation are constrained according to the physicochemical law. 

The substrate generation/tip collection (SG/TC) mode with an ampero-metric tip was historically the first SECM-type measurement performed (32). The aim of such experiments was to probe the diffusion layer generated by the large substrate electrode with a much smaller amperometric sensor. A simple approximate theory (32a,b) using the well-known c(z, t) function for a potentiostatic transient at a planar electrode (33) was developed to predict the evolution of the concentration profile following the substrate potential perturbation. A more complicated theory was based on the concept of the impulse response function (32c). While these theories have been successful in calculating concentration profiles, the prediction of the time-de-pendent tip current response is not straightforward because it is a complex function of the concentration distribution. Moreover, these theories do not account for distortions caused by interference of the tip and substrate diffusion layers and feedback effects. 

Fig. 17 Transient concentration profiles in y-direction (i.e., along 8-ring channels) measured by interference microscopy for a adsorption and b desorption of methanol in a large crystal of ferrierite for pressure steps 5 -> 10 and 10 5 mbar. The form of the profiles shows that both surface resistance and internal diffusion (along the 8-ring chan-...

Fig. 33 Schematics of interference microscopy, a Two light beams, one passing through the crystal and the other through the simrounding atmosphere, b The interference microscope. c Interference patterns generated due to different optical properties of the media passed hy the two beams, d Concentration profiles calculated from the changes in interference patterns with time...

Fig. 36 Intracrystalline concentration profiles of isobutane in silicalite-1 along the z direction during adsorption a,b profiles measured by interference microscopy c,d simulated profiles, assuming that the internal interfaces serve only as transport barriers. For the simnlated profiles the time nnit is 10 elementary diffnsion steps. The eqnilibrinm valnes of C(y, z) after the end of adsorption are eqnal to 1...

The evidence of interference microscopy nicely correlates with the models of crystallization, which in the case of SAPO-5 favor a pencil-like crystallization core [79,80], while in CrAPO-5 crystalUzation proceeds via the formation of dumbbell-shaped structures [81,82]. In no case coifid a nanoporous material with the desired structure of microscopic, ideal macaronis be identified. The appearing dramatic deviation from an ideal channel structure excludes the appHcation of simple model assiunptions for interpretation of the time evolution of the concentration profiles, hi fact, in [83] the experimentally monitored concentration profiles during... 

Fig. 45 Comparison of the transient concentration profiles during methanol uptake by the MOF-type crystal as recorded by interference microscopy (symbols) with the corresponding profiles recalculated from the measured diffusivities with surface permeabilities (full line in Fig. 44) which lead to the best fit to the experimental points...

Fig. 50 Concentration profiles integrated over the z direction observed by interference microscopy during a methanol pressure step from 0 to 1 mbar. a Two-dimensional and b one-dimensional profiles in the crystal center along the x (fair spheres) and y (black spheres) directions. The times after onset of adsorption are indicated in b...

Fig. 29. (a) Ferrierite crystal with a two-dimensional pore structure utilized to determine spatially resolved concentration of methanol, (b) Intercrystalline concentration profiles measured during adsorption hy interference microscopy. Reprinted from 202, cop5rright 2006, with kind permission from American Chemical Society. 

---