Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interference Between Additives

Ciba Specialty Chemicals has demonstrated that an N-alkoxy hindered amine light stabiliser can increase the effectiveness of halogenated flame retardants, reducing the amoimt of flame retardant required. Its Tinuvin FR can improve light stability and flame retardancy in exterior polypropylene articles, including outdoor furniture. The same company also offers easily dosable grades of UV stabiliser, to provide better control over dosing, and hence reduced costs. [Pg.139]


Utilize different electrolytes in zinc- and bromine-side circulatory loops of the RFB system Possibly reduce chemical interference between additives and other electrochemically active species (especially primary charge-carriers) Need to identify optimal electrode-electrolyte combination(s), followed by electrochemical tests to characterize improvements in system efficiency... [Pg.108]

In the presence of weak disorder, one should consider an additional contribution to the resistivity due to weak localisation resulting from quantum interference effects and/or that due to Coulomb interaction effects. A single-carrier weak localisation effect is produced by constructive quantum interference between elastically back-scattered partial-carrier-waves, while disorder attenuates the screening between charge carriers, thus increasing their Coulomb interaction. So, both effects are enhanced in the presence of weak disorder, or, in other words, by defect scattering. This was previously discussed for the case of carbons and graphites [7]. [Pg.111]

If measurements are made in thin oxide films (of thickness less than 5 nm), at highly polished Al, within a small acceptance angle (a < 5°), well-defined additional maxima and minima in excitation (PL) and emission (PL and EL) spectra appear.322 This structure has been explained as a result of interference between monochromatic electromagnetic waves passing directly through the oxide film and EM waves reflected from the Al surface. In a series of papers,318-320 this effect has been explored as a means for precise determination of anodic oxide film thickness (or growth rate), refractive index, porosity, mean range of electron avalanches, transport numbers, etc. [Pg.487]

Subsequent studies on cyclopentadiene, in which the antarafacial concerted 1,4-addition is impossible because of interference between the antimony system and the methylene of cyclopentadiene, have however shown70 that both butadiene and cyclopentadiene react with SbCIs through a stepwise mechanism involving a carbenium ion intermediate. In agreement with a non-concerted mechanism are also the data related to the 1,4-addition... [Pg.570]

The peak shift data in Fig. 17 show oscillatory character, as is our first two examples (I2 and LH1). This arises from vibrational wavepacket motion. In addition, the very fast drop in peak shift to about 65% of the initial value in -20 fs results from the interference between the wavepackets created in different intramoleculear modes. This conclusion follows directly from obtaining the frequencies and relative coupling strengths of the intramolecular modes from transient grating studies of IR144, carried out in the same solvents (data not shown). Thus, by visual inspection of Fig. 17, an answer to a long-standing question—What fraction of the spectral width arises from intra- and intermolecular motion —is immediately apparent. [Pg.172]

Equation (33) assumes that IV// is large compared to 2J (i.e., no electronic and vibrational recurrences). In addition, Eq. (33) deals only with population dynamics Interferences between different Franck-Condon factors are neglected. These interferences do influence the rate, and the interplay between electronic and vibrational dynamics can be quite complex [25], Finally, as discussed by Jean et al. [22], Eq. (33) does not separate the influence of pure dephasing (T-T) and population relaxation (Ti). These two processes (defined as the site representation [22]) can have significantly different effects on the overall rate. For example, when (T () becomes small compared to Eq. (33) substantially overestimates the rate compared to... [Pg.177]

S. A. Rice To answer the question by Prof. Gerber, I should emphasize that the key element of the Brumer-Shapiro scheme is the exploitation of interference between two pathways connecting the same initial and iinal states. Unless the excitation sources connect the same initial and final states, and not different ones for the two pathways, the interference effect is compromised. The use of short laser pulses for the two excitation pathways has the potential disadvantage of providing bandwidth for the excitation of other pathways in addition to the desired pathways hence the pulse must be kept long enough to avoid this possibility. [Pg.284]

Fig. 8. The c axis polarized second singlet-singlet absorption of As naphthalene in a durene host crystal. The center of the 0-0 band is near 34,550 cm 1 and that of the a (9) addition is near 35,050 cm 1. The fine structure, as narrow as 1 cm"1 in some crystals, is attributed to interference between the second excited singlet state and vibrational additions to the first which have coupling symmetry. The isotopes 1,4, 5,8 — dt, 2,3, 6,7 — d4, and dg-naphthalene produce entirely different structures. For a given isotope, the major structural features change as the separation between the two excited singlets is varied by host-induced shifts, but remain rather similar for hosts that produce the same separation. Fig. 8. The c axis polarized second singlet-singlet absorption of As naphthalene in a durene host crystal. The center of the 0-0 band is near 34,550 cm 1 and that of the a (9) addition is near 35,050 cm 1. The fine structure, as narrow as 1 cm"1 in some crystals, is attributed to interference between the second excited singlet state and vibrational additions to the first which have coupling symmetry. The isotopes 1,4, 5,8 — dt, 2,3, 6,7 — d4, and dg-naphthalene produce entirely different structures. For a given isotope, the major structural features change as the separation between the two excited singlets is varied by host-induced shifts, but remain rather similar for hosts that produce the same separation.
This pathway is electronically favorable, but the steric interference between the groups attached to the double bonds is likely to be severe. Such repulsions can be relieved if there are no groups sticking out sidewise at one end of the double bond, as with the central carbon of 1,2-propadiene, CH2=C=CH2, and ketene, CH2=C=0. These substances often undergo. [2 + 2] cycloadditions rather readily (Section 13-3D), and it is likely that these are concerted additions occurring by the Mobius route. [Pg.1002]

To establish reasonable acceptance criteria for accuracy during planning, we should obtain statistical laboratory control limits from the laboratory that will perform analysis for the project samples. We should also be aware of matrix interferences in environmental samples that may reduce the accuracy of analysis. As part of QC procedures, to estimate the effects of matrix interference on accuracy, laboratories perform the accuracy determinations on environmental samples, known as matrix spike (MS) and matrix spike duplicate (MSD). These fortified samples enable the laboratory to detect the presence of interferences in the analyzed matrices and to estimate their effect on the accuracy of sample analysis. (In the absence of matrix interferences, an additional benefit from MS/MSD analysis is an extra measure of analytical precision calculated as the RPD between the two recoveries.)... [Pg.42]

From these experiments it can be concluded that the closure of the monofunctional adducts depends upon the presence of other adducts in its vicinity. Although a systematic study has not yet been done, the interference between two or more adducts is expected to be a function of several parameters, such as the nature and the number of base pairs between the adducts, the DNA supercoiling, the local environment of the DNA, in addition to the distortions of the DNA double helix induced by the adducts, which are also function of these parameters. DNA has to be platinated at a low drug-to-nucleotide residue ratio when in vitro and in vivo experiments are compared. This holds also for cisplatin-modified DNA, but is masked by the preferential binding of cisplatin to runs of guanine residues and the ability of the monofunctional adducts to react with the adjacent residues. [Pg.167]

There are now direct experimental confirmations [41-43], to be discussed in Section 13.3, of the effect of the pulse shaping. In addition, the role of the phase j-1 between two pulses, predicted in both OCT [104,119] and in CC studies [94,96,1R>J. has been confirmed experimentally by Fleming et al. [137,138], Girard et al. [JO- j 142], Kinrot et al, [143], and Warmuth et al. [144] in the so-called wave paiket interferometry experiments [145], For example, Fleming et al, [137,138] [and Warmuth et al. [144] describe experiments where the fluorescence from I2 in the F t state is influenced by constructive or destructive interference between two wave pad.-, j ets induced by two-phase related excitation pulses. This study relates to a large voliuiiejy of work on wave packet interferometry in atoms [146-148], as well as to various." femtochemistry experiments, where similar effects were seen in absorption [106] . jj... [Pg.90]

In a multitryptophan protein, the fluorescence quantum yield of tryptophans can be additive or not. In the first case, there is no interference between Trp residues. In the second case, energy transfer between tryptophan residues can influence the quantum yield of each of them. [Pg.101]

The second term in Equations (1) and (2) accounts for diffu-sional transfer across the bubble boundary. (A factor e /(1+e p is sometimes (e.g. 49) included in the bracket of Eq. 2 o account for the dense phase diffusional resistance.) There is some question (30) of the extent to which there is interference between the bulk flow and diffusion terms. Nevertheless, most experimental evidence suggests that the two terms are additive and that the diffusional term is described by the penetration theory. With these changes, and including a small enhancement factor for bubble interaction. Sit and Grace (35) have recommended the following equations as being in best accord with existing experimental data ... [Pg.11]


See other pages where Interference Between Additives is mentioned: [Pg.138]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.1884]    [Pg.1985]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.607]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.557]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.711]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.607]   


SEARCH



Interference additive

© 2024 chempedia.info