Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interfaces structural determinants

This idea is also sustained by the absolute intensities of X-ray diffraction at small angles [164]. Some chemical and physical properties of polymer crystals cannot be explained by regular folding of the chains they require about 15% of disordered interface structure determined by the partial folding of chains and by crystalline sequences of the same macromolecule not occupying the neighbouring positions in the crystal [165]. [Pg.155]

Tyrode, E., lohnson, C., Kumpulainen, A., Rutland, M.W., Claesson, PM. Hydration state of nonionic surfactant mono-layers at the hqnid/vapor interface structure determination by vibrational sum frequency spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 16848-16859 (2005). doi 10.102 l/ja053289z... [Pg.175]

Step I. The time dependent structure of the interface is determined. Relevant properties may be characterized by a general function H(t), which for the ca.se of polymer melts can usually be described in terms of the static and dynamic properties of the polymer chains. For example, with symmetric (A = B) amorphous melt interfaces, H(t) describes the average molecular properties developed at the interface by the interdiffusion of random coil chains as [ 1,6J... [Pg.353]

Step 3. The set of fracture properties G(t) are related to the interfaee structure H(t) through suitable deformation mechanisms deduced from the micromechanics of fracture. This is the most difficult part of the problem but the analysis of the fracture process in situ can lead to valuable information on the microscopic deformation mechanisms. SEM, optical and XPS analysis of the fractured interface usually determine the mode of fracture (cohesive, adhesive or mixed) and details of the fracture micromechanics. However, considerable modeling may be required with entanglement and chain fracture mechanisms to realize useful solutions since most of the important events occur within the deformation zone before new fracture surfaces are created. We then obtain a solution to the problem. [Pg.355]

When relating interface structure to strength, the literature is replete with analyses, which are based on the nail solution [1,58], as shown in Fig. 10. This model is excellent when applied to very weak interfaces (Gic 1 J/m ) where most of the fracture events in the interface occur on a well-defined 2D plane. However, the nail solution is not applicable to strong interfaces (Gic 100-1000 J/m ), where the fracture events occur in a 3D deformation zone, at the crack tip. In Fig. 10, two beams are bonded by E nails per unit area of penetration length L. The fracture energy G c, to pull the beams apart at velocity V is determined by... [Pg.369]

The HIV-l protease is a remarkable viral imitation of mammalian aspartic proteases It is a dimer of identical subunits that mimics the two-lobed monomeric structure of pepsin and other aspartic proteases. The HIV-l protease subunits are 99-residue polypeptides that are homologous with the individual domains of the monomeric proteases. Structures determined by X-ray diffraction studies reveal that the active site of HIV-l protease is formed at the interface of the homodimer and consists of two aspartate residues, designated Asp and Asp one contributed by each subunit (Figure 16.29). In the homodimer, the active site is covered by two identical flaps, one from each subunit, in contrast to the monomeric aspartic proteases, which possess only a single active-site flap. [Pg.522]

Some details of the electronic structure of a specific melal-on-polymcr interface have been presented to illustrate the importance of such interfaces in determining... [Pg.85]

There has been considerable and continuing investment in e-science and Grid-based computing around the world. Of particular interest for protein crystallography is the e-HTPX project funded by the UK research councils (http //www.e-htpx.ac.uk). The aim of e-HTPX is to unify the procedures of protein structure determination into a single all-encompassing interface from which users can initiate, plan, direct, and document their experiment either locally or remotely from a desktop computer. [Pg.292]

In situ SAXS investigations of a variety of sol-gel-derived silicates are consistent with the above predictions. For example, silicate species formed by hydrolysis of TEOS at pH 11.5 and H20/Si = 12, conditions in which we expect monomers to be continually produced by dissolution, are dense, uniform particles with well defined interfaces as determined in SAXS experiments by the Porod slope of -4 (non-fractal) (Brinker, C. J., Hurd, A. J. and Ward, K. D., in press). By comparison, silicate polymers formed by hydrolysis at pH 2 and H20/Si = 5, conditions in which we expect reaction-limited cluster-cluster aggregation with an absence of monomer due to the hydrolytic stability of siloxane bonds, are fractal structures characterized by D - 1.9 (Porod slope — -1.9) (29-30). [Pg.319]

We have adapted a commercially available x-ray diffractometer normally used for structure determinations on single crystals to operate as a very flexible device for performing x-ray pole figure determinations and related studies on polymeric materials. Descriptions of crystallite orientations, as provided by pole figures, are useful in studying many aspects of the behavior of products made from semicrystalline polymers. This paper describes the software that we have written for our pole figure facility. Except for some vendor-provided routines to drive the hardware Interface all of our software is written in FORTRAN. Menu driven operation is provided to maximize user convenience. [Pg.140]

The core of the current version of Candid is implemented in standard Fortran-77 and has been built upon the data structures and into the framework of the user interface of the program Dyana. The standard schedule and parameters for a complete automated structure determination with Candid and Dyana are specified in a script written in the interpreted command language Inclan that gives the user high flexibility in the way automated structure determination is performed without the need to modify the compiled core part of Candid [26]. [Pg.58]

The integrated DLS device provides an example of a measurement tool tailored to nano-scale structure determination in fluids, e.g., polymers induced to form specific assemblies in selective solvents. There is, however, a critical need to understand the behavior of polymers and other interfacial modifiers at the interface of immiscible fluids, such as surfactants in oil-water mixtures. Typical measurement methods used to determine the interfacial tension in such mixtures tend to be time-consuming and had been described as a major barrier to systematic surveys of variable space in libraries of interfacial modifiers. Critical information relating to the behavior of such mixtures, for example, in the effective removal of soil from clothing, would be available simply by measuring interfacial tension (ILT ) for immiscible solutions with different droplet sizes, a variable not accessible by drop-volume or pendant drop techniques [107]. [Pg.98]

Since the quantities fiTCd and depend only on the properties of Ox and Red components in the solution bulk, the quantity Fredox defined by Eq. (6) is in no way related to the electrode nature and does not depend on the interface structure. Moreover, under thermodynamic equilibrium between the electrode and solution it is Fredox that determines the electrochemical potential of electrons in the electrode. This implies, in particular, that the value of F is the same for any electrode that is in equilibrium with a given redox system. Thus, the position of the Fredox level in a solution is determined by the redox system contained in it. The more positive the equilibrium potential of this system [Pg.262]


See other pages where Interfaces structural determinants is mentioned: [Pg.8]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.564]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.731]    [Pg.735]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.61]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.394 , Pg.395 ]




SEARCH



Interface determination

Interface structure

© 2024 chempedia.info