Interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions ion transfer

June 24, 1922, Pfsek, then Czechoslovakia - May 30, 1994, Prague, Czech Republic) Professor of physical chemistry at Charles University, leading scientific worker of the Polarographic Institute, Prague. Koryta studied processes at the mercury jet electrode [i-ii], the electrochemical behavior of complex compounds [iii], and the effect of adsorption of electroinactive compounds on electrode processes [iv]. Later he concentrated on processes at the interface of immiscible electrolyte solutions (- interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions, ion transfer at liquid-liquid interfaces) [v, vi]. He co-authored a textbook on electrochemistry ([vii]), which was translated into several languages. 

Wandlowski, T., V. Marecek, Z. Samec, and R. Fuoco, Effect of the temperature on the ion transfer across the interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions. Ion transfer dynamics, J Electroanal Chem, Vol. 331, (1992) p. 765. 

In particular, the coupling between the ion transfer and ion adsorption process has serious consequences for the evaluation of the differential capacity or the kinetic parameters from the impedance data [55]. This is the case, e.g., of the interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions each containing a transferable ion, which adsorbs specifically on both sides of the interface. In general, the separation of the real and the imaginary terms in the complex impedance of such an ITIES is not straightforward, and the interpretation of the impedance in terms of the Randles-type equivalent circuit is not appropriate [54]. More transparent expressions are obtained when the effect of either the potential difference or the ion concentration on the specific ion adsorption is negli-... 

Potential differences at the interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions (ITIES) are typical Galvani potential differences and cannot be measured directly. However, their existence follows from the properties of the electrical double layer at the ITIES (Section 4.5.3) and from the kinetics of charge transfer across the ITIES (Section 5.3.2). By means of potential differences at the ITIES or at the aqueous electrolyte-solid electrolyte phase boundary (Eq. 3.1.23), the phenomena occurring at the membranes of ion-selective electrodes (Section 6.3) can be explained. 

For semiconductor electrodes and also for the interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions (ITIES), the greatest part of the potential difference between the two phases is represented by the potentials of the diffuse electric layers in the two phases (see Eq. 4.5.18). The rate of the charge transfer across the compact part of the double layer then depends very little on the overall potential difference. The potential dependence of the charge transfer rate is connected with the change in concentration of the transferred species at the boundary resulting from the potentials in the diffuse layers (Eq. 4.3.5), which, of course, depend on the overall potential difference between the two phases. In the case of simple ion transfer across ITIES, the process is very rapid being, in fact, a sort of diffusion accompanied with a resolvation in the recipient phase. 

The electrodes used in conventional polarography and voltammetry are electronic conductors such as metals, carbons or semiconductors. In an electrode reaction, an electron transfer occurs at the electrode/solution interface. Recently, however, it has become possible to measure both ion transfer and electron transfer at the interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions (ITIES) by means of polarography and voltammetry [16]. Typical examples of the immiscible liquid-liquid interface are water/nitrobenzene (NB) and water/l,2-dichloroethane (DCE). 

Electroinactive species — Ions and neutral compounds that show no signal in electrochemical measurements. In this sense, -> supporting electrolyte ions are electroinactive at least in the potential window. However, note that whether a species is electroactive or not should depend on the electrode used and measurement conditions. For example, tetramethylammonium ion is electroinactive at conventional electrodes, but electroactive at the interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions, where it gives a voltammetric wave for transfer across the interface. 

Interface between two liquid solvents — Two liquid solvents can be miscible (e.g., water and ethanol) partially miscible (e.g., water and propylene carbonate), or immiscible (e.g., water and nitrobenzene). Mutual miscibility of the two solvents is connected with the energy of interaction between the solvent molecules, which also determines the width of the phase boundary where the composition varies (Figure) [i]. Molecular dynamic simulation [ii], neutron reflection [iii], vibrational sum frequency spectroscopy [iv], and synchrotron X-ray reflectivity [v] studies have demonstrated that the width of the boundary between two immiscible solvents comprises a contribution from thermally excited capillary waves and intrinsic interfacial structure. Computer calculations and experimental data support the view that the interface between two solvents of very low miscibility is molecularly sharp but with rough protrusions of one solvent into the other (capillary waves), while increasing solvent miscibility leads to the formation of a mixed solvent layer (Figure). In the presence of an electrolyte in both solvent phases, an electrical potential difference can be established at the interface. In the case of two electrolytes with different but constant composition and dissolved in the same solvent, a liquid junction potential is temporarily formed. Equilibrium partition of ions at the - interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions gives rise to the ion transfer potential, or to the distribution potential, which can be described by the equivalent two-phase Nernst relationship. See also - ion transfer at liquid-liquid interfaces. 

Distribution (Nernst) potential — Multi-ion partition equilibria at the -> interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions give rise to a -> Galvanipotential difference, Af(j> = (j>w- 0°, where 0wand cj>°are the -> inner potentials of phases w and o. This potential difference is called the distribution potential [i]. The theory was developed for the system of N ionic species i (i = 1,2..N) in each phase on the basis of the -> Nernst equation, the -> electroneutrality condition, and the mass-conservation law [ii]. At equilibrium, the equality of the - electrochemical potentials of the ions in the adjacent phases yields the Nernst equation for the ion-transfer potential,... 

There is considerable interest in ion and electron transfer processes at the interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions (ITIES), e.g., water and 1,2-dichloroethane. SECM can be used to monitor such processes (Chapter 8). It allows one to separate ion transport from electron transfer... 

---