Integrated systems critical planning

In conclusion, the scope of what can be done for the project and engineering organization by advanced computer systems is truly wonderful, but the prudent user needs to treat all such systems critically. Utilize only those which are rigorously specified, tested on real applications (by real project people), not over-ambitious, and manifestly will pay their way in terms of a conservative business plan. There are definite cut-off points in project size and complexity below which it is not economical to operate fully integrated systems. Systems application below this threshold should not be attempted unless there are other non-economic factors such as a client who requires them (usually, for interface into overall plant information management systems). 

The need to integrate judgment with mathematical techniques has become a critical issue for improved performance in the area of predicting what any system should plan and produce. The reality is that forecasting consists of equal parts modeling and sound management. 

System testing proceeds from small scale components tests to the first integrated system test (the DTM ) to larger scale and more integrated testing to demonstrate system features in electrically heats tests (EM and QM). Comparable cross-section testing, cold critical and hot critical testing was planned. 

Evidence of sufficient control of these issues should be demonstrated in the validation documentation. Compliance must be integrated using a formal methodology and an appropriate system life-cycle approach that is clearly identified in the user requirements phase for any new computerized systems. The priority for validation activities can be established by analyzing the control scheme system and subsystem inventory for the criticality, validation stams, software category, and system type. This analysis aids validation planning and prioritization. 

Based on interviews with personnel at three of the incineration plants, the committee concluded that critical safety systems in general are clearly identified but that, as described previously, the definitions at TOCDF differ from those used for the WGI sites, although work is in process to integrate the best aspects of the two approaches into more consistent plans. 

The enterprise identifies the TPMs, which are key indicators of system performance. Selection of TPMs should be limited to critical MOPs that, if not met, pnt the project at cost, schedule, or performance risk. Specific TPM activities are integrated into the SEMS to periodically determine achievement to date and to measure progress against a planned valne profile. 

One of the most important factors for implementation of IT systems to facilitate coordination ofthe supply chain is data integrity. Data accuracy has been found to be a critical success factor for implementation ofmate rial requirementsplanning (Petroni, 2002 Ismail, 2005) and enterprise resource planning (Nelson, 2002 Xu, Nord, Brown, Nord, 2002) systems. Data integrity is not just an issue for implementation, but extends to the operation of the supply chain. Raman, DeHora-tius, and Ton (2001) point to the experience of a... 

---