Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Semiempirical methods integrals

The molecular and liquid properties of water have been subjects of intensive research in the field of molecular science. Most theoretical approaches, including molecular simulation and integral equation methods, have relied on the effective potential, which was determined empirically or semiempirically with the aid of ab initio MO calculations for isolated molecules. The potential parameters so determined from the ab initio MO in vacuum should have been readjusted so as to reproduce experimental observables in solutions. An obvious problem in such a way of determining molecular parameters is that it requires the reevaluation of the parameters whenever the thermodynamic conditions such as temperature and pressure are changed, because the effective potentials are state properties. [Pg.422]

The semiempirical methods represent a real alternative for this research. Aside from the limitation to the treatment of only special groups of electrons (e.g. n- or valence electrons), the neglect of numerous integrals above all leads to a drastic reduction of computer time in comparison with ab initio calculations. In an attempt to compensate for the inaccuracies by the neglects, parametrization of the methods is used. Meaning that values of special integrals are estimated or calibrated semiempirically with the help of experimental results. The usefulness of a set of parameters can be estimated by the theoretical reproduction of special properties of reference molecules obtained experimentally. Each of the numerous semiempirical methods has its own set of parameters because there is not an universial set to calculate all properties of molecules with exact precision. The parametrization of a method is always conformed to a special problem. This explains the multiplicity of semiempirical methods. [Pg.179]

Even ab initio Hartree-Fock methods can become very expensive for large systems. In these cases, the semiempirical methods are the ones generally applied. In these methods, some of the integrals are neglected and others are replaced using empirical data. [Pg.4]

The valence state ionization potential —the resonance integrals and the one-center electron repulsion integrals can be considered as basic parameters of the semiempirical method and can be adjusted to give optimal agreement. The core charges Z, indicate the number of 71 electrons the center M contributes to the n system, and the two-center electron repulsion integrals are obtained from an empirical relationship such as the Mataga-Nishimoto formula ... [Pg.5]

Semiempirical methods are widely used, based on zero differential overlap (ZDO) approximations which assume that the products of two different basis functions for the same electron, related to different atoms, are equal to zero [21]. The use of semiempirical methods, like MNDO, ZINDO, etc., reduces the calculations to about integrals. This approach, however, causes certain errors that should be compensated by assigning empirical parameters to the integrals. The limited sets of parameters available, in particular for transition metals, make the semiempirical methods of limited use. Moreover, for TM systems the self-consistent field (SCF) procedures are hardly convergent because atoms with partly filled d shells have many... [Pg.681]

We have previously defined the one-electron spin-density matrix in the context of standard HF methodology (Eq. (6.9)), which includes semiempirical methods and both the UHF and ROHF implementations of Hartree-Fock for open-shell systems. In addition, it is well defined at the MP2, CISD, and DFT levels of theory, which permits straightforward computation of h.f.s. values at many levels of theory. Note that if the one-electron density matrix is not readily calculable, the finite-field methodology outlined in the last section allows evaluation of the Fermi contact integral by an appropriate perturbation of the quantum mechanical Hamiltonian. [Pg.328]

An ab initio calculation uses the correct molecular electronic Hamiltonian (1.275) and does not introduce experimental data (other than the values of the fundamental physical constants) into the calculation. A semiempirical calculation uses a Hamiltonian simpler than the correct one, and takes some of the integrals as parameters whose values are determined using experimental data. The Hartree-Fock SCF MO method seeks the orbital wave function 0 that minimizes the variational integral <(4> //el initio method. Semiempirical methods were developed because of the difficulties involved in ab initio calculation of medium-sized and large molecules. We can... [Pg.40]

We now consider the PPP, CNDO, INDO, and MINDO two-electron semiempirical methods. These are all SCF methods which iteratively solve the Hartree-Fock-Roothaan equations (1.296) and (1.298) until self-consistent MOs are obtained. However, instead of the true Hartree-Fock operator (1.291), they use a Hartree-Fock operator in which the sum in (1.291) goes over only the valence MOs. Thus, besides the terms in (1.292), f/corc(l) m these methods also includes the potential energy of interaction of valence electron 1 with the field of the inner-shell electrons rather than attempting a direct calculation of this interaction, the integrals of //corc(/) are given by various semiempirical schemes that make use of experimental data furthermore, many of the electron repulsion integrals are neglected, so as to simplify the calculation. [Pg.42]

Numerous other semiempirical methods have been proposed. The MNDO method has been extended to d functions by Theil and coworkers and is referred to as MNDO/d.155>156 For second-row and heavier elements, this method does significantly better than other methods. The semi-ab initio method 1 (SAM1)157>158 is based on the NDDO approximation and calculates some one- and two-center two-electron integrals directly from atomic orbitals. [Pg.183]

SAMI (semi ab initio method number 1) was the last semiempirical method to be reported (1993, [76]) by Dewar s group. SAMI is essentially a modification of AMI in which the two-electron integrals are calculated ab initio using contracted... [Pg.411]

On the other hand, the term semiempirical is usually reserved for those calculations where families of difficult-to-solve integrals are replaced by equations and parameters that are fitted to experimental data. Semiempirical methods describe... [Pg.287]

The highly specific behavior of transition metal complexes has prompted numerous attempts to access this Holy Grail of the semi-empirical theory - the description of TMCs. From the point of view of the standard HFR-based semiempirical theory, the main obstacle is the number of integrals involving the d- AOs of the metal atoms to be taken into consideration. The attempts to cope with these problems have been documented from the early days of the development of semiempirical quantum chemistry. In the 1970s, Clack and coworkers [78-80] proposed to extend the CNDO and INDO parametrizations by Pople and Beveridge [39] to transition elements. Now this is an extensive sector of semiempirical methods, differing by expedients of parametrizations of the HFR approximation in the valence basis. These are, for example, in methods of ZINDO/1, SAMI, MNDO(d), PM3(tm), PM3 etc. [74,81-86], From the... [Pg.122]

The two-electron integrals (Equation 6.32) are determined from atomic experimental data in the one-center case, and are evaluated from a semiempirical multipole model in the two-center case that ensures correct classical behavior at large distances and convergence to the correct one-center limit. Interestingly, this parameterization results in damped effective electron-electron interactions at small and intermediate distances, which reflects a (however less regular) implicit partial inclusion of electron correlation (Thiel, 1998). In this respect, semiempirical methods go beyond the HF level, and may accordingly be superior to HF ab initio treatments for certain properties that have a direct or indirect connection to the parameterization procedure. [Pg.105]

Semiempirical techniques are the next level of approximation for computational simulation of molecules. Compared to molecular mechanics, this approach is slow. The formulations of the self-consistent field equations for the molecular orbitals are not rigorous, particularly the various approaches for neglect of integrals for calculation of the elements of the Fock matrix. The emphasis has been on versatility. For the larger molecular systems involved in solvation, the semiempirical implementation of molecular orbital techniques has been used with great success [56,57]. Recent reviews of the semiempirical methods are given by Stewart [58] and by Rivail [59],... [Pg.233]


See other pages where Semiempirical methods integrals is mentioned: [Pg.38]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.444]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.1123]    [Pg.2731]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.4 ]




SEARCH



Integration method

Semiempirical

Semiempirical Methods Integrals and Scaling

Semiempirical methods

© 2024 chempedia.info