Instrumental methods, inorganic analytical

Different analytical procedures have been developed for direct atomic spectrometry of solids applicable to inorganic and organic materials in the form of powders, granulate, fibres, foils or sheets. For sample introduction without prior dissolution, a sample can also be suspended in a suitable solvent. Slurry techniques have not been used in relation to polymer/additive analysis. The required amount of sample taken for analysis typically ranges from 0.1 to 10 mg for analyte concentrations in the ppm and ppb range. In direct solid sampling method development, the mass of sample to be used is determined by the sensitivity of the available analytical lines. Physical methods are direct and relative instrumental methods, subjected to matrix-dependent physical and nonspectral interferences. Standard reference samples may be used to compensate for systematic errors. The minimum difficulties cause INAA, SNMS, XRF (for thin samples), TXRF and PIXE. 

Instrumental methods of analysis generally offer greater sensitivity and selectivity than the TLC approach outlined above. Different techniques are required for inorganic or organic analytes, as well as for compounds having limited volatility or thermal stability. In general, the greater sensitivity offered by instrumental methods is accompanied by a need for some form of sample pre-treatment. 

The analytical method by which all the inorganic acids may be analyzed in a single sample is ion chromatography. Using the stated instrumental conditions the analytical range is... 

A great number of different standard and nonstandard analytical methods are available for the determination of inorganic constituents in water. Since the concentrations of some inorganic constituents are relatively high in water, classical methods (gravimetry and titration) were mostly used in early experiments. These methods, however, have been largely replaced, chiefly by faster, more sensitive, and more sophisticated instrumental methods. 

Complexation reactions have many uses in analytical chemistiy, but their classical application is in complexometric titrations. Here, a metal ion reacts with a suitable ligand to form a complex, and the equivalence point is determined by an indicator or an appropriate instrumental method. The formation of soluble inorganic complexes is not widely used for titrations, as discussed later, but the formation of precipitates, particularly with silver nitrate as the titrant, is the basis for many important determinations (see Section 13F). 

In early studies of major, minor, and trace elements in coal (9 13), coal ash was analyzed using emission spectroscopy. Recent studies (3.4.14.15) have employed several quantitative multielement instrumental methods. The instrumental methods used at the Illinois State Geological Survey and the United States Geological Survey are shown in Table I. Because a particular analytical technique is better suited for certain elements than for others, a combination of methods is usually necessary to determine all elements of interest. Methods for determining inorganic elements in coal must be accurate and precise. In addition, if possible, they should determine a large number of elements of interest simultaneously, require relatively little sample preparation, be capable of automation, produce an output compatible with... 

The first quantitative analytical fields to be developed were for quantitative elemental analysis, which revealed how much of each element was present in a sample. These early techniques were not instrumental methods, for the most part, but relied on chemical reactions, physical separations, and weighing of products (gravimetry), titrations (titrimetry or volumetric analysis), or production of colored products with visual estimation of the amount of color produced (colorimetry). Using these methods, it was found, for example, that dry sodium chloride, NaCl, always contained 39.33% Na and 60.67% Cl. The atomic theory was founded on early quantitative results such as this, as were the concept of valence and the determination of atomic weights. Today, quantitative inorganic elemental analysis is performed by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS), AES of many sorts, inorganic MS (snch as ICP-MS), XRF, ion chromatography (1C), and other techniques discussed in detail in later chapters. 

The determination of an analyte s concentration based on its absorption of ultraviolet or visible radiation is one of the most frequently encountered quantitative analytical methods. One reason for its popularity is that many organic and inorganic compounds have strong absorption bands in the UV/Vis region of the electromagnetic spectrum. In addition, analytes that do not absorb UV/Vis radiation, or that absorb such radiation only weakly, frequently can be chemically coupled to a species that does. For example, nonabsorbing solutions of Pb + can be reacted with dithizone to form the red Pb-dithizonate complex. An additional advantage to UV/Vis absorption is that in most cases it is relatively easy to adjust experimental and instrumental conditions so that Beer s law is obeyed. 

An extremely wide variety of analytical methods are used by RM producers and developers in the certification of RMs for inorganic elemental content. These methods range from the classical, through current instrument based methods to highly specialized definitive methods. 

The concentration of organic materials in seawater is too low to merit direct utilization of many of the modern analytical instruments concentration by a factor of a hundred or more is necessary in many instances. Furthermore, the water and inorganic salts interfere with many of the analytical procedures. Separation of the organic components from seawater therefore accomplishes two purposes it removes interfering substances, and at the same time concentrates enough organic matter to make analysis possible. It is not surprising that considerable effort has been put into methods of separation and concentration. 

---