Inner-sphere reorganization, Marcus

It has been shown so far that internal and external factors can be combined in the control of the electron-transfer rate. Although in most cases a simple theoretical treatment, e.g. by the Marcus approach, is prevented by the coincidence of these factors, it is clear that the observed features for the isoenergetic self-exchange differ by the electronic coupling and the free energy of activation. Then it is also difficult to separate the inner- and outer-sphere reorganization energies. 

There is a small complication in that the frequency to is different for the reduced and oxidized states so that one has to take an average frequency. Marcus has suggested taking u>av = 2woxu>red/(wox + a>reci)-When several inner-sphere modes are reorganized, one simply sums over the various contributions. The matter becomes complicated if the complex is severely distorted during the reaction, and the two states have different normal coordinates. While the theory can be suitably modified to account for this case, the mathematics are cumbersome. 

The Marcus classical free energy of activation is AG , the adiabatic preexponential factor A may be taken from Eyring s Transition State Theory as (kg T /h), and Kel is a dimensionless transmission coefficient (0 < k l < 1) which includes the entire efiFect of electronic interactions between the donor and acceptor, and which becomes crucial at long range. With Kel set to unity the rate expression has only nuclear factors and in particular the inner sphere and outer sphere reorganization energies mentioned in the introduction are dominant parameters controlling AG and hence the rate. It is assumed here that the rate constant may be taken as a unimolecular rate constant, and if needed the associated bimolecular rate constant may be constructed by incorporation of diffusional processes as ... 

This model was used by Marcus and expressions for the inner-sphere (A,) and solvent-reorganization energy (A0) were derived (see below). It should be noted that the transfer of the electron from one metal center to the other in the transition state is associated with an electrostatic effect of sometimes appreciable magnitude. 

---