Injection isothermal problems

When a surfactant is injected into the liquid beneath an insoluble monolayer, surfactant molecules may adsorb at the surface, penetrating between the monolayer molecules. However it is difficult to determine the extent of this penetration. In principle, equilibrium penetration is described by the Gibbs equation, but the practical application of this equation is complicated by the need to evaluate the dependence of the activity of monolayer substance on surface pressure. There have been several approaches to this problem. In this paper, previously published surface pressure-area Isotherms for cholesterol monolayers on solutions of hexadecy1-trimethyl-ammonium bromide have been analysed by three different methods and the results compared. For this system there is no significant difference between the adsorption calculated by the equation of Pethica and that from the procedure of Alexander and Barnes, but analysis by the method of Motomura, et al. gives results which differ considerably. These differences indicate that an independent experimental measurement of the adsorption should be capable of discriminating between the Motomura method and the other two. 

The sample can be introduced into either a flash vaporizer or directly onto the end of the column. The best technique depends on the application, the sample, the column type, and whether the column is heated isothermally or by temperature-programming. Instantaneous vaporization of the sample on injection is the usual method of ensuring a reproducible retention time and maintaining good efficiency of separation. This approach, however, is unsatisfactory for samples containing heat-sensitive compounds (commonly encountered in biomedical applications). Samples that are very dilute and require a large volume to be injected also cause problems. 

Injection molding is a rather complex process during which non-Newtonian as well as non-isothermal effects play significant roles. Here, we present a couple of problems that are relatively simple to allow an analytical solution. Injection molding is discussed further in the next chapters. 

Sample balancing problem. Let us consider the multi-cavity injection molding process shown in Fig. 6.54. To achieve equal part quality, the filling time for all cavities must be balanced. For the case in question, we need to balance the cavities by solving for the runner radius R2. For a balanced runner system, the flow rates into all cavities must match. For a given flow rate Q, length L, and radius R, solve for the pressures at the runner system junctures. Assume an isothermal flow of a non-Newtonian shear thinning polymer. Compute the radius R2 for a part molded of polystyrene with a consistency index (m) of 2.8 x 104 Pa-s" and a power law index (n) of 0.28. Use values of L = 10 cm, R = 3 mm, and Q = 20 cm3/s. 

Most real cases of polymer melting (and solidification) involve complex geometries and shapes, temperature-dependent properties, and a phase change. The rigorous treatment for such problems involve numerical solutions (12-15) using finite difference (FDM) or FEMs. Figure 5.9 presents calculated temperature profiles using the Crank-Nicolson FDM (16) for the solidification of a HDPE melt inside a flat-sheet injection-mold cavity. The HDPE melt that has filled the cavity is considered to be initially isothermal at 300°F, and the mold wall temperature is 100°F. 

Hollander and co-workers [303—305] dealt with the problem in detail and developed a method for the isolation of hormones from blood, using Bio-Rad AG 50W-X2 (100—120 mesh) ion-exchange resin. Acylation with pivalic anhydride—methanol—triethylamine (20 1 1) was performed at 70°C for 10 min. The derivatives were purified with the aid of Amberlite IR-45 resin and benzene as a solvent. The dry residue was dissolved in 100 jul of benzene and 5 /il were injected directly on to a 60 cm X 4 mm I.D. column packed with 5% OV-1 on Chromosorb W HP after an isothermal period at 220°C for 12 min, the temperature was increased at 3°C/min up to 300°C. Calibration standards were injected immediately after the sample. Almost identical results were obtained for T3 by GC and radioimmunoassay [304], Other workers [306] applied the same procedure to the seeds and analysed pivalyl methyl esters of T3 and T4 on an 81 cm column packed with 3% of Dexsil on Chromosorb W HP at 305°C. 

Sorption of Cu(tfac)2 on a column depends on the amount of the compound injected, the content of the liquid phase in the bed, the nature of the support and temperature. Substantial sorption of Cu(tfac)2 by glass tubing and glass-wool plugs was observed. It was also shown that sorption of the copper chelate by the bed is partialy reversible . The retention data for Cr(dik)3, Co(dik)3 and Al(dik)3 complexes were measured at various temperatures and various flow rates. The results enable one to select conditions for the GC separation of Cr, Al and Co S-diketonates. Retention of tfac and hfac of various metals on various supports were also studied and were widely used for the determination of the metals. Both adsorption and partition coefficients were found to be functions of the average thickness of the film of the stationary phase . Specific retention volumes, adsorption isotherms, molar heats and entropy of solution were determined from the GC data . The retention of metal chelates on various stationary phases is mainly due to adsorption at the gas-liquid interface. However, the classical equation which describes the retention when mixed mechanisms occur is inappropriate to represent the behavior of such systems. This failure occurs because both adsorption and partition coefficients are functions of the average thickness of the film of the stationary phase. It was pointed out that the main problem is lack of stability under GC conditions. Dissociation of the chelates results in a smaller peak and a build-up of reactive metal ions. An improvement of the method could be achieved by addition of tfaH to the carrier gas of the GC equipped with aTCD" orFID" . ... 

First, in the design of configurations in which the distances between the active zones are all equal, the first zone always has to be placed at the very entrance of the reactor. This may be technically infeasible because of problems with the injection device or requirements such as isothermicity and uniformity of flow. In such cases, a free space before the first active zone is required. However, in our analysis, we do not include the length of this free space in the value of L, which therefore still represents the usable reactor length. 

---