Inference interpretation

Two methods are commonly applied for library searches. Identity or retrieval searches assume that the spectrum of the unknown compound is present in the reference library, and only experimental variability prevents a perfect match of the unknown and reference spectra. When no similar spectra are retrieved the only information provided is that the unknown spectrum is not in the library. Similarity or interpretive searches assume that the reference library does not contain a spectrum of the unknown compound, and are designed to produce structural information from which identity might be inferred. Interpretive methods typically employ a predetermined set of spectral features, designed to correlate with the presence of chemical substructures. Searching identifies the library spectra that have features most similar to those of the unknown spectrum. The frequency of occurrence of a substructure in the hit list is used to estimate the probability that it is present in the unknown compound. Two well-developed interpretative search algorithms are SISCOM (Search of Identical and Similar Compounds) and STIRS (the Self-Training Interpretive and Retrieval System) [174-177]. Normally a retrieval search is performed first, and when the results are inconclusive, an interpretive search is implemented. In both cases, success depends on the availability of comprehensive libraries of high-quality reference spectra [178]. 

The first system called LiSSA has been developed for interpretation of data from eddy-current inspection of heat exchangers. The data that has to be interpreted consists of a complex impedance signal which can be absolute and/or differential and may be acquired in several frequencies. The interpretation of data is done on the basis of the plot of the signal in the impedance plane the type of defect and/or construction is inferred from the signal shape, the depth from the phase, and the volume is roughly proportional to the signal amplitude. 

When Vogel wants to brominate something using regular old 48% aq. HBr, he has sulfuric acid already present in the pot. The following is a representative recipe from his book. Just read it. Strike does not expect you to get the inference right away. Strike will explain Strike s interpretation afterwards. 

Interpreta.tlon, Whereas statistical tests estabhsh whether results are or are not different from (over) an exposure criteria, the generaUty of this outcome must be judged. What did the samples represent May the outcome, which is inferred to cover both sampled and unsampled periods, be legitimately extrapolated into the future In other words, is the usual assumption of a stationary mean vaUd AH of these questions are answered by judgment and experience appHed to the observations made at the time of sampling, and the answers are used to interpret the quantitative results. 

Evidence of the appHcation of computers and expert systems to instmmental data interpretation is found in the new discipline of chemometrics (qv) where the relationship between data and information sought is explored as a problem of mathematics and statistics (7—10). One of the most useful insights provided by chemometrics is the realization that a cluster of measurements of quantities only remotely related to the actual information sought can be used in combination to determine the information desired by inference. Thus, for example, a combination of viscosity, boiling point, and specific gravity data can be used to a characterize the chemical composition of a mixture of solvents (11). The complexity of such a procedure is accommodated by performing a multivariate data analysis. 

Probability in Bayesian inference is interpreted as the degree of belief in the truth of a statement. The belief must be predicated on whatever knowledge of the system we possess. That is, probability is always conditional, p(X l), where X is a hypothesis, a statement, the result of an experiment, etc., and I is any information we have on the system. Bayesian probability statements are constructed to be consistent with common sense. This can often be expressed in tenns of a fair bet. As an example, I might say that the probability that it will rain tomorrow is 75%. This can be expressed as a bet I will bet 3 that it will rain tomorrow, if you give me 4 if it does and nothing if it does not. (If I bet 3 on 4 such days, I have spent 12 I expect to win back 4 on 3 of those days, or 12). 

Unfortunately, some authors describing their work as Bayesian inference or Bayesian statistics have not, in fact, used Bayesian statistics rather, they used Bayes rule to calculate various probabilities of one observed variable conditional upon another. Their work turns out to comprise derivations of informative prior distributions, usually of the form piQi, 02,..., 0 1 = which is interpreted as the posterior distribution... 

They were able to infer p for the identity reaction in which Ar = Ar, and interpreted the results in terms of a More O Ferrall-Jencks diagram of the type described in Section 5.3. 

There is a lively controversy concerning the interpretation of these and other properties, and cogent arguments have been advanced both for the presence of hydride ions H" and for the presence of protons H+ in the d-block and f-block hydride phases.These difficulties emphasize again the problems attending any classification based on presumed bond type, and a phenomenological approach which describes the observed properties is a sounder initial basis for discussion. Thus the predominantly ionic nature of a phase cannot safely be inferred either from crystal structure or from calculated lattice energies since many metallic alloys adopt the NaCl-type or CsCl-type structures (e.g. LaBi, )S-brass) and enthalpy calculations are notoriously insensitive to bond type. 

Another approach to assess the partitioning of metals among the phases comprising natural particulate matter is to sequentially and selectively extract or dissolve portions of natural particulate matter. Based on the release of trace metals accompanying each step, associations between the trace metal and the extracted phase are inferred. Both of the above approaches have drawbacks, and at this time it is impossible to predict in advance how and to what extent metals and particulate matter will bond to one another in a natural system. Despite the uncertainties, empirical results can often be interpreted using the framework provided here. 

On a still shorter timescale, Sigmarsson (1996) used Pb- Ra disequilibria in Surtsey and Heimaey (Iceland) lavas to infer the differentiation time from the Surtsey alkali basalt erupted in 1963-1967 to the Heimaey hawaiites and mugearites (1973 eruption). The ( Pb/ Ra) ratios increase from the basalts to the evolved lavas, which can be explained by a closed system differentiation of about 10 years, a value similar to the time elapsed between the two eruptions. Thus, the Heimaey eruption is interpreted as a consequence of the injection in the crust of a small volume of basaltic magma, 10 years before eruption, a duration long enough to allow its differentiation towards hawaiite and mugearite compositions. 

---